Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zklqj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T00:46:06.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Litter Productivity in Large White Pigs: 2. Heritability and repeatability estimates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. S. Strang  and
J. W. B. King
G. S. Strang
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
J. W. B. King
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Summary

Estimates of the heritability, the repeatability and the genetic cor-relation coefficients of litter performance traits were calculated from data on 38000 Large White litters farrowed in 146 British herds.

The repeatability estimates of number of live pigs per litter at birth, three weeks and eight weeks were 0·15, 0·14 and 0·14 respectively. The corresponding heritability estimates were 0·07±0·02, 0·07±0·02 and 0·09±0·03, respectively. The repeatability estimates of litter weight at three weeks and eight weeks were 0·15 and 0·04, while the corresponding heritabiUty estimates were 0·08±0·02 and 0·03±0·02. High positive genetic and phenotypic correlations were obtained between litter size and litter weight.

A number of model culling schemes were considered and it was found that even at relatively high culling levels the improvement in overall herd mean performance was very small. Direct selection for litter size may yield a useful rate of improvement if selection is con-fined to one trait and large selection differentials are achieved, but could not be economically justified.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , May 1970 , pp. 235 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bohren, B. B., McKean, H. E. and Yamada, Y. 1961. Relative efficiencies of heritability estimates based on regression of offspring on parent. Biometrics 17: 481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. H. and Turner, H. N. 1968. Responses to selection in Australian Merino sheep. II. Estimates of phenotypic and genetic parameters for some production traits in Merino evves and an analysis of the possible effects of selection on them. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19: 303–322.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G. E., Blunn, C. T., Chapman, A. B., Kottman, R. M., Krider, J. L., Warwick, E. J. and Whatley, J. A. Jr, 1954. Evaluation of selection in developing inbred lines of swine. Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 551.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. 1961. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hazel, L. N. 1943. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28: 476–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempthorne, O. and Tandon, O. B. 1953. The estimation of heritability by regression of offspring on parent. Biometrics 9: 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korkman, N. 1947. Causes of variation in the size and weight of litters from sows. acta. Agric. suec. 2: 253–310.Google Scholar
Legault, C. 1967. [Genetic parameters ofsow performance traits inFrenchLargeWhites.] Rapport presenté aux journées d'études de la Commission de Génétique de la Fédération Européenne de Zootechnie, Oslo.Google Scholar
Lush, J. L. 1945. Animal Breeding Plans. Iowa State College Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Lush, J. L. and Molln, A. E. 1942. Litter size and weight as permanent characteristics of sows. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dept. Agric., No. 836.Google Scholar
Moav, R. and Hill, W. G. 1966. Specialised sire and dam lines. IV. Selection within lines. Anim. Prod. 8: 375–390.Google Scholar
Rendel, J. M. 1950. Experimental analysis of the inheritance of productivity and growth in pigs. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 18: 235–240.Google Scholar
Šiler, R. 1962. [The inheritance of some production characters in Improved White pigs.] Živočišná Výroba 7: 575–582.Google Scholar
Smith, C. and King, J. W. B. 1964. Crossbreeding and litter production in British pigs. Anim. Prod. 6: 265–271.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. 1956. Statistical Methods. 5th ed.Iowa State College Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Strang, G. S. 1970. Litter productivity in Large White pigs. 1. The relative importance of some sources of variation. Anim. Prod. 12: 225–233.Google Scholar
Urban, W. E., Shelby, C. E., Chapman, A. B., Whatley, J. A. and Garwood, V. A. 1966. Genetic and environmental aspects of litter size in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 25: 1148–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar