Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-frp75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T16:19:10.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nutrition of the early-weaned calf VII. The relative value of four different fish meal products as the major protein source in the diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

F. G. Whitelaw ,
T. R. Preston  and
N. A. MacLeod
F. G. Whitelaw
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
T. R. Preston
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
N. A. MacLeod
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
Get access

Extract

While it is generally agreed that fish meal protein is of high biological value for non-ruminants, variations in quality are known to occur as a result of differences in the nature of the parent material (Duckworth, Woodham and McDonald, 1961) or in the method of processing (Grau et al., 1959; Ousterhout and Snyder, 1961). Duckworth, Woodham and McDonald (1961) have shown that the Gross Protein Value offish meals can range from 92 to 119; within this range white-fish meals had a mean value of 102 while the mean value for herring meals was 113. Differences of a similar order have been reported by other workers (Record and Bethke, 1933; Heiman, Carver and Cook, 1939; Robertson, Carver and Cook, 1940; March, Stupich and Biely, 1949; Carpenter, 1954; Carpenter, Ellinger and Shrimpton, 1954; Duckworth, 1955).

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , February 1964 , pp. 25 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Annison, E. F., Chalmers, M. I., Marshall, S. B. M. & Synge, R. L. M., 1954. Ruminal ammonia formation in relation to the protein requirement of sheep. III. Ruminal ammonia formation with various diets. J. agric. Sci., 44: 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, A. E., Miller, D. S. & Tunnah, E. J., 1953. The biological value of fish meals. Proc. Nutr. Soc., 31: ii.Google Scholar
Bisset, H. M. & Tarr, H. L. A., 1954. The nutritive value of herring meals. II. Effect of heat on availability of essential amino acids. Poult. Sci., 33: 250.Google Scholar
Boge, C., 1960. Amino acid composition of herring (Clupea harengus) and herring meal. Destruction of amino-acids during processing. J. Sci. Fd Agric., 11: 362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, K. J., 1954. The relative values of available protein concentrates for non-ruminants. Proc. Nutr. Soc., 13: 23.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K. J. & Ellinger, G. M., 1955. Protein quality and ‘available’ lysine in animal products. Poult. Sci., 34: 1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, K. J., Ellinger, G. M., Munro, G. M. & Rolfe, E. J., 1957. Fish products as protein supplements to cereals. Brit. J. Nutr., 10: 69.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K. J., Ellinger, G. M. & Shrimpton, D. H., 1954. The nutritive value of six white fish meals of known origin. Proc. Nutr. Soc., 13: xx.Google Scholar
Chalmers, M. I., 1961. In Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of the Ruminant (Editor, Lewis, D.). Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Clandrnin, D. R., 1949. The effects of methods of processing on the nutritive value of herring meals. Poult. Sci., 28: 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckworth, J., 1955. The value of certain agricultural, marine and industrial products and by-products in livestock feeding. II. Non-ruminants. J. Sci. Fd Agric., 6: 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckworth, J., Woodham, A. A. & McDonald, I., 1961. The assessment of nutritive value in protein concentrates by the gross protein value method. J. Sci. Fd Agric., 12: 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grau, C. R., Karrick, N. L., Lundholm, B. D. & Barnes, R. N., 1959. Nutritional values of fish meal proteins and their relation to processing variables. Comm. Fish Rev., 21,(8): 7.Google Scholar
Heiman, V., Carver, J. S. & Cook, J. W., 1939. A method for determining the gross protein value of protein concentrates. Poult. Sci., 18: 464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laksesvala, B., 1958. Protein value and amino acid balance of condensed herring solubles and spontaneously heated herring meal. Chick experiments. J. agric. Sci., 51: 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, B. E., Stupich, D. & Biely, J., 1949. The evaluation of the nutritional value of fish meals and meat meals. Poult. Sci., 28: 718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, L. A., Bender, R. C. & McCay, C. M., 1932. Vitamin A and protein content of various fish meals. J. agric. Res., 44: 591.Google Scholar
Njaa, L. R., 1961. Effect of supplementing with methionine, cysteine and derivatives of thiazolide-4-carboxylic acid on the nutritive value of herring meal protein. J. Sci. Fd Agric., 12: 757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olley, J. & Watson, H., 1961. The available lysine content of fish meals. J. Sci. Fd Agric., 12: 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ousterhout, L. E., Grau, C. R. & Lundholm, B. D., 1959. Biological availability of amino acids in fish meals and other protein sources. J. Nutr., 69: 65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ousterhout, L. E. & Snyder, D. G., 1961. Effects of processing on the nutritive value offish products in animal nutrition. In Fish in Nutrition. FAO International Congress, Washington, D.C. (Editors, Heen, A. E. & Kreuzer, R.). Fishing News (Books) Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R., 1956. Studies on the rearing of calves weaned from milk between two and four weeks of age. Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod., p. 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, T. R., Whitelaw, F. G. & MacLeod, N. A., 1963. The nutrition of the early-weaned calf. IV. Ruminal ammonia formation from soluble and insoluble protein sources. Anim. Prod., 5: 147.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R., Whitelaw, F. G. & MacLeod, N. A., 1964. The nutrition of the early-weaned calf. VI. The effect of supplemental lysine and methionine on the utilisa-tion of groundnut protein. Anim. Prod., 6: 17.Google Scholar
Record, P. R. & Bethke, R. M., 1933. A comparative study of different fish meals for chicks. Poult. Sci., 12: 333.Google Scholar
Record, P. R., Bethke, R. M. & Wilder, O. H. M., 1934. Effect of method of manufacture on the nutritive value offishmeals as determined by growth studies with chicks. J. agric Res., 49: 715.Google Scholar
Robertson, E. I., Carver, J. S. & Cook, J. W., 1940. Gross value of protein supplements for poultry. Bull. Wash. State agric. Exp. Sta., no. 388.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. H., 1932. Nitrogen balance studies with various fish meals. J. agric Res., 44: 723.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G. & Preston, T. R., 1963. The nutrition of the early-weaned calf. III. Protein solubility and amino acid composition as factors affecting nitrogen utilisation. Anim. Prod., 5: 131.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G., Preston, T. R. & Dawson, G. S., 1961. The nutrition of the early-weaned calf. II. A comparison of commercial groundnut meal, heat-treated groundnut meal and fish meal as the major protein source in the diet. Anim. Prod., 3: 127.Google Scholar
Wilgus, H. S. Jr, Norris, L. G. & Heuser, G. F., 1935. The relative protein efficiency and the relative vitamin G content of common protein supplements used in poultry rations. J. agric. Res., 51: 383.Google Scholar