Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T09:45:28.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A possible indicator muscle for the fibre content and growth characteristics of porcine muscle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

N. C. Stickland
Affiliation:
Muscle Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Hull
G. Goldspink
Affiliation:
Muscle Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Hull
Get access

Summary

Fibre number and fibre size were measured in the flexor digiti V brevis muscle and other muscles in pigs of different breeds. A large variation in fibre number (200%) was found among the breeds. However, the fibre number in the flexor digiti V brevis was closely correlated with fibre number of other muscles in the same animal. Fibre number and size measurements were also carried out on animals at different ages taken from a relatively pure breed of pig. Fibre size was found to increase to differing extents in different muscles, although the increase in the flexor digiti V brevis was almost the same as in the longissimus dorsi. Fibre number did not change during growth. On the basis of these findings it is suggested that the flexor digiti V brevis is a suitable indicator muscle for genetic experiments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dumont, B. L. and Schmttt, O. 1970. [Comparative study of muscular structure in pigs of Large White and Pietrain breeds.] Ann. Gènèt. Sèl. Anim. 2 (4): 381393.Google Scholar
Glebina, E. L. 1952. Changes in the muscle tissue of pigs due to cross-breeding. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 21: No. 299.Google Scholar
Goldspink, G. 1964. The combined effects of exercise and reduced food intake on skeletal muscle fibres. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 63: 209216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. and appleton, A. B. 1932. Study of the leg of mutton. Part V. In Growth and the Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. Oliver and Boyd, London.Google Scholar
Hillers, J. K. 1970. Comparing three methods of measuring longissimus area. J. Anim. Sci. 31: 843845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joubert, D. M. 1956. An analysis of factors influencing post natal growth and development of the muscle fibre. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 47: 59102.Google Scholar
Lawrie, R. A. and Gatherum, D. P. 1964. Studies on the muscles of meat animals. V. Inter- and intra-litter differences in the composition of longissimus dorsi muscles from pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 62: 381390.Google Scholar
Livingston, D. M. S., Blair, R. and english, P. R. 1966. The usefulness of muscle fibre diameter in the studies of lean meat content of pigs. Anim. Prod. 8: 267273.Google Scholar
Luff, A. R. and Goldspink, G. 1967. Large and small muscles. Life Sci. 6: 18211826.Google Scholar
Mauch, A. and marinesco, J. 1934. Comparison of the flesh of Mangulica, Large White and Lincoln breeds and their crosses. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 3: 50.Google Scholar
Rowe, R. W. D. and Goldspink, G. 1969. Muscle fibre growth in five different muscles in both sexes of mice. I. Normal mice. J. Anat. 104: 519530.Google Scholar
Staun, H. 1963. Various factors affecting number and size of muscle fibres in the pig. Acta Agric. scand. XIII: 293322.Google Scholar
Staun, H. 1968. [Diameter and number of muscle fibres and their relation to meatiness and meat quality in Danish Landrace pigs.] 366 Beretn. fra forsøgslab. København., p. 121.Google Scholar
Swanson, L. A., Kline, E. and goll, D. 1965. Variability of muscle fibre size in bovine longissimus dorsi. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 97101.Google Scholar
Walker, M. G., Burd, A. C. and Pull, G. A. 1972. The total numbers of white skeletal muscle fibres in cross section as a character for stock separation in North Sea Herring. J. Cons. int. Explor. Mer. 34: 238243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P. E. and Goldspink, G. 1971. Longitudinal growth of striated muscle fibres. J. Cell. Sci. 9: 751767.Google Scholar