Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zklqj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T12:03:00.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reproductive rhythm and litter weaning age as they affect rabbit doe performance and body energy balance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

G. Xiccato ,
A. Trocino ,
C. Boiti  and
G. Brecchia
G. Xiccato*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Università degli Studi di Padova, Agripolis, Viale dell'Università 16, I-35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
A. Trocino
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Università degli Studi di Padova, Agripolis, Viale dell'Università 16, I-35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
C. Boiti
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Biopatologiche Veterinarie ed Igiene delle produzioni animali e alimentari, Sezione di Fisiologia, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Via S. Costanzo 4, I-06126 Perugia, Italy
G. Brecchia
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Biopatologiche Veterinarie ed Igiene delle produzioni animali e alimentari, Sezione di Fisiologia, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Via S. Costanzo 4, I-06126 Perugia, Italy
*
†E-mail: gerolamo.xiccato@unipd.it
Get access

Abstract

Abstract One hundred and twenty multiparous does were synchronized to give birth the same day (initial kindling). The trial lasted until the successive (final) kindling. Immediately following initial kindling, 22 does were selected for comparative slaughter. The remaining does were assigned to three reproductive rhythms and mated 2 (R2), 11 (R11) or 26 (R26) days post partum. Within each rhythm, the does were further divided into two groups with litters weaned at 21 (W21) or 25 (W25) days of age. A total of 54 does were pregnant and were slaughtered soon after final kindling. By increasing the kindling-to-mating interval from 2 to 26 days, total milk production was increased (5590 to 6065 g for R2 and R26, respectively; P < 0·05); voluntary food intake during lactation was not affected (356 g/day on average), but during the dry period was reduced (182 to 169 g/day; P < 0·05) in this way accounting for a decrease during the experimental period on the whole (299 to 249 g/day; P < 0·01). At the final kindling, the number of kits born per litter was lower in does submitted to the R11 than to the R26 rhythm (P < 0·01). By increasing the kindling-to-mating interval, doe body water concentration decreased, while fat and energy increased (P < 0·01) and higher empty body gain was recorded (from −123 to −4, and to +97 g, in R2, R11 and R26 does, respectively; P < 0·001). As a result, body protein, fat and energy balances changed from negative values to approach equilibrium as reproductive rhythm became extensive (energy balance: −0·14, −0·02 and +0·01 of the initial body content in R2, R11 and R26 does, respectively; P < 0·001). At 28 days after kindling, blood leptin concentration was higher (P < 0·01) and IGF-1 lower (P < 0·05) in R26 does. Daily food intake throughout the experiment was lower (P < 0·05) in W21 does due to the longer dry period. Increasing weaning age from 21 to 25 days increased both number of kits born alive per litter (from 7·4 to 9·6; P < 0·05) and doe body water concentration, while body energy tended to decrease (P < 0·1). At 28 days after kindling lower blood leptin concentration was recorded in W21 than W25 does (1·87 v. 2·76 μg/l, P < 0·05).

Keywords

energy balanceleptinrabbitsreproductionweaning age

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 81 , Issue 2 , October 2005 , pp. 289 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ajuwon, K.M., Kuske, J.L., Anderson, D.B., Hancock, D.L., Houseknecht, K.L., Adeola, O. and Spurlock, M. E. 2003. Chronic leptin administration increases serum NEFA in the pig and differentially regulates PPAR expression in adipose tissue. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 14: 576–583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemist, 15th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Blas, J.C. de and Mateos, G.G. 1998. Feed formulation. In The nutrition of the rabbit (ed. de Blas, C. and Wiseman, J.), pp. 241–253. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Castellini, C., Dal Bosco, A. and Mugnai, C. 2003. Comparison of different reproduction protocols for rabbit does: effect of litter size and mating interval. Livestock Production Science 83: 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cervera, C., Fernández-Carmona, J., Viudes, P. and Blas, E. 1993. Effect of remating interval and diet on the performance of female rabbits and their litters. Animal Production 56: 399–405.Google Scholar
Fortun-Lamothe, L., Prunier, A., Bolet, G. and Lebas, F. 1999. Physiological mechanism involved in the effects of concurrent pregnancy and lactation on foetal growth and mortality in the rabbit. Livestock Production Science 60: 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraga, M.J., Lorente, M., Carabaño, R.M. and de Blas, J.C. 1989. Effect of diet and remating interval on milk production and milk composition of the doe rabbit. Animal Production 48: 459–466.Google Scholar
Goering, H. and Van Soest, P.J. 1970. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Agricultural handbook no. 379. ARS, USDA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Houseknecht, K.L. and Spurlock, M. 2003. Leptin regulation of lipid homeostasis: dietary and metabolic implications. Nutrition Research Reviews 16: 83–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebas, F. 1971. Composition chimique du lait de lapine, évolution au cours de la traite et en fonction du stade de lactation. Annales de Zootechnie 20: 185–191.Google Scholar
Lebas, F. 1972. Effet de la simultanéité de la lactation et de la gestation sur les performances laitières chez la lapine. Annales de Zootechnie 21: 129–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicodemus, N., Gutiérrez, I., García, J., Carabaño, R. and Blas, C. de. 2002. Effect of remating interval and weaning age on the reproductive performance of rabbit does. Animal Research 51: 517–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parigi Bini, R. and Xiccato, G. 1998. Energy metabolism and requirements. In The nutrition of the rabbit (ed. de Blas, C. and Wiseman, J.), pp. 103–131. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Parigi Bini, R., Xiccato, G. and Cinetto, M. 1989. Influenza dell'intervallo parto-accoppiamento sulle prestazioni riproduttive delle coniglie fattrici. Rivista di Coniglicoltura 26(7): 51–57.Google Scholar
Parigi Bini, R., Xiccato, G., Cinetto, M. and Dalle Zotte, A. 1992. Energy and protein utilization and partition in rabbit does concurrently pregnant and lactating. Animal Production 55: 153–162.Google Scholar
Parigi Bini, R., Xiccato, G., Dalle Zotte, A., Carazzolo, A., Castellini, C. and Stradaioli, G. 1996. Effect of remating interval and diet on the performance and energy balance of rabbit does. Proceedings of the sixth world rabbit congress, Toulouse, France, vol. 1, pp. 253–258.Google Scholar
Pascual, J.J., Cervera, C., Blas, E. and Fernández-Carmona, J. 1999. Effect of high fat diets on the performance, milk yield and milk composition of multiparous rabbit does. Animal Science 68: 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascual, J.J., Cervera, C., Blas, E. and Fernández-Carmona, J. 2003. High-energy diets for reproductive rabbit does: effect of energy source. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B: Livestock Feeds and Feeding 73: 27R–39R.Google Scholar
Perez, J.M., Lebas, F., Gidenne, T., Maertens, L., Xiccato, G., Parigi Bini, R., Dalle Zotte, A., Cossu, M.E., Carazzolo, A., Villamide, M.J., Carabaño, R., Fraga, M.J., Ramos, M.A., Cervera, C., Blas, E., Fernandez, J., Falcao-E-Cunha, L. and Bengala Freire, J. 1995. European reference method for in vivo determination of diet digestibility in rabbits. World Rabbit Science 3: 41–43.Google Scholar
Quevedo, F., Pascual, J.J., Cervera, C. and Moya, V.J. 2004. Efecto del número de parto sobre la condición corporal y la productividad de las conejas lactantes. Proceedings of the XXIX symposium de cunicultura, Lugo, Spain, pp. 137–141.Google Scholar
Robertson, J.B. and Van Soest, P.J. 1981. The detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. In The analysis of dietary fiber in food (ed. James, W. P. T. and Theander, O.), pp. 142–143. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Rommers, J.M., Boiti, C., Brecchia, G., Meijerhof, R., Noordhuizen, J.P. T.M., Decuypere, E. and Kemp, B. 2004. Metabolic adaptation and hormonal regulation in young rabbit does during long-term caloric restriction and subsequent compensatory growth. Animal Science 79: 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1991. User's guide, statistics, version 6·03, edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Xiccato, G., Trocino, A., Sartori, A. and Queaque, P. I. 2004. Effect of doe parity order and litter weaning age on the performance and body energy deficit of rabbit does. Livestock Production Science 85: 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar