Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T06:23:16.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Systems of concentrate allocation for dairy cattle 3. A comparison of two flat-rate feeding systems at two amounts of concentrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

F. R. Moisey
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Crichton Royal Farm, Dumfries DG1 4SZ
J. D. Leaver
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Crichton Royal Farm, Dumfries DG1 4SZ
Get access

Abstract

In a 20-week experiment beginning at week 3 post partum, autumn-calving dairy cows were offered either a flat rate of concentrates in which all the cows received the same daily amount throughout the experiment (G). or a flat rate based on their individual milk yield at 2 weeks post partum (I). Two amounts of concentrates were compared and grass silage was available ad libitum. The amounts of concentrate were 6 kg/day (6) and 12 kg/day (12). In the I treatments the ranges of individual inputs were 4 to 8 and 9 to 15 kg/day for the 6 and 12 kg/day treatments respectively. For treatments 6G, 61, 12G, and 121 respectively, mean milk yields were 25·5, 25·7, 28·9 and 27·6 kg/day; mean live-weight changes +0·05, +0·04, +0·19 and +0·27 kg/day; and mean silage dry-matter intakes 11·1, 11·2, 8·1 and 7·5 kg/day. The differences between systems of allocation were not significant, but differences between amounts of concentrate offered were significant. The system of allocation had no significant effect on milk composition. In the residual period (2 weeks indoors and 19 weeks grazing) there were no significant effects on performance. The mean 305-day milk yields for 6G, 61, 12G and 121 respectively were 6376, 6422, 6720 and 6597 kg.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Bines, J. A. 1979. Voluntary food intake. In Feeding Strategy for the High Yielding Dairy Cow (ed. Broster, W. H. and Swan, H.), pp. 2348. Granada Publishing, St Albans.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1956. Starch equivalents, ration standards and milk production. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod., pp. 131.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1967. The feeding of dairy cows for optimal production. George Scott Robertson Memorial Lecture, No. 16. The Queen's University, Belfast.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. 1976. Plane of nutrition for the dairy cow. In Principles of Cattle Production (ed. Swan, H. and Broster, W. H.), pp. 271285. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. and Broster, Valerie J. 1984. Reviews of the progress of dairy science: long term effects of plane of nutrition on the performance of the dairy cow. J. Dairy Res. 51: 149196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broster, W. H., Broster, Valerie J., Smith, T. and Siviter, J. W. 1975. Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. IX. Food utilization in lactation. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 84: 173186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H. and Thomas, C. 1981. The influence of level and pattern of concentrate input on milk output. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1981 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 4969. Butterworth, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, A. W. A. 1957. Influence of level of feeding during lactation upon the yield and composition of milk. Dairy Sci. Abstr. 19: 435454.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E. 1982. Feeding high quality silage. In Silage for Milk Production (ed. Rook, J. A. F. and Thomas, P. C.) Tech. Bull. 1, pp. 127150. National Institute for Research in Dairying, Reading, Hannah Research Institute, Ayr.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1982. The effect of pattern of concentrate allocation on milk production from autumn-calving heifers. Anim. Prod. 34: 5561.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1984. The effect of pattern of concentrate allocation for autumn-calving cows. Anim. Prod. 38: 521 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Johnson, C. L. 1977. The effect of the plane and pattern of concentrate feeding on milk yield and composition in dairy cows. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 88: 7994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. L. 1979. The effect of level and frequency of concentrate feeding on the performance of dairy cows of different yield potential. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 92: 743751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moisey, F. R. and Leaver, J. D. 1984. A study of two cutting strategies for the production of grass silage for dairy cows. Res. Dev. Agric. 1: 4752.Google Scholar
Stergaard, V. 1979. Optimum feeding strategy during lactation. In Feeding Strategy for the High Yielding Dairy Cow (ed. Broster, W. H. and Swan, H.), pp. 171194. Granada Publishing, St Albans.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. and Gordon, F. J. 1980. The effect of level and system of concentrate allocation to January/February calving cows on total lactation performance. Anim. Prod. 30: 3951.Google Scholar
Strickland, M. J. 1980. The development and evaluation of components of new systems on experimental husbandry farms. Anim. Prod. 30: 474 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Taylor, W. and Leaver, J. D. 1984a. Systems of concentrate allocation for dairy cattle. 1. A comparison of three patterns of allocation for autumn-calving cows and heifers offered grass silage ad libitum. Anim. Prod. 39: 315324.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. and Leaver, J. D. 1984b. Systems of concentrate allocation for dairy cattle. 2. A comparison of two patterns of allocation for autumn-calving cows offered two qualities of grass silage ad libitum. Anim. Prod. 39: 325333.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 1980. Conserved forages. In Feeding Strategies for Dairy Cows (eds. Broster, W. H.Johnson, C. L. and Tayler, J. C.), pp. 8.18.14. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. N. and Wood, P. D. P. 1983. Some nutritional aspects of high yielding dairy herds. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition – 1983 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 179197. Butterworth, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar