Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T18:30:13.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ability of Cattle to Distinguish Between, and Their Preference for, Floors with Different Levels of Friction, and Their Avoidance of Floors Contaminated with Excreta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

C J C Phillips*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 OES, UK School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK
I D Morris
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints

Abstract

The ability of dairy cows to discriminate between floors with a smooth epoxy resin surface or with surface-applied bauxite aggregates of mean diameters 0.5 mm, 1.2 mm or 2.5 mm (having coefficients of static friction of 0.35, 0.42, 0.49 and 0.74, respectively) was recorded when they were offered the opportunity to walk down paired floor surfaces to receive a food reward. Following training, one half of the cows were rewarded when they selected the floor with the greater friction and the other half were rewarded when they selected the floor with the least friction. The cows were able to distinguish between the different floor surfaces — even between surfaces with 0.5 mm and 1.2 mm aggregates, which humans found difficult to distinguish. Eight similar cows were then offered a choice of walking down passageways of paired floors with an equal reward at the end of each passageway. There were no consistent preferences for floor type, and when the reward was offered only on the side least favoured by each cow in the initial test, the random pattern of selection was still evident. A final choice test offered the cows the opportunity to traverse passageways of either wet concrete or concrete covered with excreta. All cows avoided the passageway with excreta completely, even when the reward was increased in this passageway and removed from the wet concrete passageway. This avoidance was attributed to the cows’ lack of contact with slurry, as they were at pasture for most of the day, in contrast to the cows used in previous work, which were housed in buildings with passageways covered in excreta and showed little avoidance behaviour of such passageways.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

MacDiarmaid, B N and Watkin, B R 1972 The cattle dung patch. 3. Distribution and rate of decay of dung patches and their influence on grazing behaviour. Journal of the British Grassland Society 27: 4854Google Scholar
Marten, G C and Donker, J D 1966 Animal excrement as a factor influencing acceptability of grazed forage. Proceedings of the Xth International Grassland Congress, 7-16 July, Helsinki, Finland pp 359363Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) 1968 Rejection of grass by cows. Great House Experimental Husbandry Farm Annual Report pp 2829. MAFF: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Minitab 1995 Minitab Reference Manual, Release 10 Xtra for Windows and Macintosh. Minitab Inc: State College, USAGoogle Scholar
Mouttotou, N, Hatchell, F M and Green, L E 1999 The prevalence and risk factors associated with forelimb skin abrasions and sole bruising in preweaning piglets. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 39: 231245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, C J C and Morris, I D 2000 The locomotion of dairy cows on concrete floors that are dry, wet or covered with a slurry of excreta. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 17671772CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, C J C and Morris, I D 2001a The locomotion of dairy cows on floor surfaces with different frictional properties. Journal of Dairy Science 84: 623628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, C J C and Morris, I D 2001b A novel operant conditioning test to determine whether dairy cows dislike passageways that are dark or covered with excreta. Animal Welfare 10: 6572Google Scholar
Webb, N G and Nilsson, C 1983 Flooring and injury — an overview. In: Baxter, S H, Baxter, M R and MacCormack, JAD (eds) Farm Animal Housing and Welfare pp 226259. Martinus Nijhoff: The Hague, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar