Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T18:26:50.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of microwave energy as a humane stunning technique based on electroencephalography (EEG) of anaesthetised cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

J-L Rault ,
PH Hemsworth ,
PL Cakebread ,
DJ Mellor  and
CB Johnson
J-L Rault*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science Centre, School of Land and Environment, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
PH Hemsworth
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science Centre, School of Land and Environment, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
PL Cakebread
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science Centre, School of Land and Environment, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
DJ Mellor
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science and Bioethics Centre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, New Zealand
CB Johnson
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science and Bioethics Centre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, New Zealand
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: raultj@unimelb.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Humane slaughter implies that an animal experiences minimal pain and distress before it is killed. Stunning is commonly used to induce insensibility but can lead to variable results or be considered unsatisfactory by some religious groups. Microwave energy can induce insensibility in rats, and high power equipment has recently been developed for sheep and cattle. We examined the effectiveness of different settings for microwave energy delivery, power and duration, to induce insensibility based on electroencephalography (EEG) of anaesthetised cows, using the minimal anaesthesia model. All applications resulted in the appearance of seizure-like complexes in the EEG, a pattern considered incompatible with awareness. Shorter duration of application resulted in more rapid EEG changes, as quickly as 3 s. Higher power resulted in a longer duration of EEG suppression, at least 37 s and up to 162 s. Microwave energy can induce insensibility in cattle based on seizure-like complexes in the EEG.

Keywords

animal welfareelectromagneticeuthanasiainsensibilitypre-slaughterslaughter
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , November 2014 , pp. 391 - 400
Copyright
© 2014 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alkire, MT, Hudetz, AG and Tononi, G 2008 Consciousness and anesthesia. Science 322: 876–880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1149213CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Meat Institute Foundation(AMI) 2010 Recommended animal handling guidelines audit guide: A systematic approach to animal wel-fare. http://www.meatami.com/ht/a/GetDocumentAction/i/61388Google Scholar
American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) 2013 M3.11 Focused beam microwave irradiation. AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition. AVMA: Schaumburg, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
Anil, H 2012 Effects of slaughter method on carcass and meat char-acteristics in the meat of cattle and sheep. EBLEX: A Division of the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, UK. http://www.eblex.org.uk/documents/content/reserch/rd_qs_g_f_f r_-_slaughter_and_meat_quality_-_FE_2-12.pdfGoogle Scholar
Anonymous 2007 Australian Standard for the Hygienic Production and Transportation of Meat and Meat Products for Human Consumption, AS4696-2007. Australia and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council, Food Regulation Standing Committee Technical Report No 3: 21. http://www.publish.csiro.au/Books/download.cfm?ID=5553Google Scholar
Benarroch, EE 2001 Pain-autonomic interactions: a selective review. Clinical Autonomic Research 11: 343–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02292765CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coenen, AML 1998 Neuronal phenomena associated with vigi-lance and consciousness: from cellular mechanisms to electroen-cephalographic patterns. Consciousness and Cognition 7: 42–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1997.0324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, CE, Gilbert, KV, Graafhuis, AE, Tavener, A, Reed, H and Leigh, P 1986 The effect of electrical stunning and slaughter on the electroencephalogram of sheep. Meat Science 17: 267–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(86)90045-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaetz, M 2004 The neurophysiology of brain injury. Clinical Neurophysiology 115: 4–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00258-XGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, TJ, Johnson, CB, Murrell, JC, Hulls, CM, Mitchinson, SL, Stafford, KJ, Johnstone, AC and Mellor, DJ 2009a Electroencephalographic responses of calves to slaughter by ven-tral neck incision without prior stunning. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 57: 77–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2009.36882CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, TJ, Johnson, CB, Murrell, JC, Mitchinson, SL, Stafford, KJ and Mellor, DJ 2009b Electroencephalographic responses to concussive non-penetrative captive-bolt stunning in halothane-anaesthetised calves. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 57:90–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2009.36884CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, TJ, Johnson, CB, Stafford, KJ, Mitchinson, SL and Mellor, DJ 2007 Validation of the acute electroencephalographic responses of calves to noxious stimulus with scoop dehorning. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 55: 152–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2007.36760CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gouveia, KG, Ferreira, PG, Roque da Costa, JC, Vaz-Pires, P and Martins da Costa, P 2009 Assessment of the efficiency of captive-bolt stunning in cattle and feasibility of associated behavioural signs. Animal Welfare 18: 171–175Google Scholar
Grandin, T 1990 Design of loading facilities and holding pens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 187–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(90)90053-GCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T 1997 Assessment of stress during handling and trans-port. Journal of Animal Science 75: 249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, NG, Fielding, HR, von Wenzlawowicz, M and Von Holleben, K 2010 Time to collapse following slaughter without stunning in cattle. Meat Science 85: 66–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.12.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guy, AW and Chou, CK 1982 Effects of high-intensity microwave pulse exposure of rat brain. Radio Science 17: 169–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/RS017i05Sp0169SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Rice, M, Karlen, MG, Calleja, L, Barnett, JL, Nash, J and Coleman, GJ 2011 Human-animal interactions at abattoirs: relationships between handling and animal stress in sheep and cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135: 24–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humane Methods of Slaughter Act 1978 Humane Methods of Slaughter Act of 1978. United States Public Law 85-765. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title7/pdf/USCODE-2011-title7-chap48.pdfGoogle Scholar
Johnson, CB, Stafford, KJ, Sylvester, SP, Ward, RN, Mitchinson, S and Mellor, DJ 2005 Effects of age on the elec-troencephalographic response to castration in lambs anaes-thetised using halothane in oxygen. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 53: 433–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2005.36589CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambooy, B, Lagendijk, J and van Rhoon, G 1989 Feasibility of stun-ning pigs with microwaves at 434 MHz. Fleischwirtschaft 69: 1030–1032Google Scholar
Marchand, Y, D’Arcy, RCN and Connolly, JF 2002 Linking neurophysiological and neuropsychological measures for aphasia assessment. Clinical Neurophysiology 113: 1715–1722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00224-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, DJ, Cook, CJ and Stafford, KJ 2000 Quantifying some responses to pain as a stressor. In: Moberg, GP and Mench, JA (eds) The Biology of Animal Stress pp 173–198. CAB International: Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Murrell, JC and Johnson, CB 2006 Neurophysiological techniques to assess pain in animals. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 29:325–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2006.00758.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakyinsige, N, Che Man, YB, Aghwan, ZA, Zulkifli, I, Goh, YM, Abu Bakar, F, Al-Kahtani, HA and Sazili, AQ 2013 Stunning and animal welfare from Islamic and scientific perspectives. Meat Science 95:352–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newhook, JC and Blackmore, DK 1982 Electroencephalographic studies of stunning and slaughter of sheep and calves II. Meat Science 6: 295–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(82)90040-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, JH, Owen, JS, Small, AH, McLean, DW and Gailer, DJ 2011 Animal Stunning. Patent WO/2011/137497. www.patentscope.wipo.intGoogle Scholar
Shaw, N 2002 The neurophysiology of concussion. Progress in Neurobiology 67: 281–344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(02)00018-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Small, A, McLean, D, Owen, JS and Ralph, J 2013a Electromagnetic induction of insensibility in animals: a review. Animal Welfare 22: 287–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.2.287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, A, McLean, D, Owen, JS and Ralph, J 2013b Preliminary investigations into the use of microwave energy for reversible stunning of sheep. Animal Welfare 22: 291–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.2.291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velarde, A, Cruz, J, Gispert, M, Carrion, D, Ruiz de la Torre, JL, Diestre, A and Manteca, X 2007 Aversion to carbon dioxide stunning in pigs: effect of carbon dioxide concentration and halothane genotype. Animal Welfare 16: 513–522Google Scholar
Velarde, A, Ruiz-de-la-Torre, JL, Rosello, C, Fabrega, E, Diestre, A and Manteca, X 2002 Assessment of return to consciousness after electrical stunning in lambs. Animal Welfare 11: 333–341Google Scholar
Woodbury, MR, Caulkett, NA, Johnson, CB and Wilson, PR 2005 Comparison of analgesic techniques for antler removal in halothane-anaesthetized red deer (Cervus elaphus): cardiovascular and somatic responses. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 32: 72–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2005.00227.xGoogle Scholar
Zivotofsky, AZ and Strous, RS 2012 A perspective on the elec-trical stunning of animals: are there lessons to be learned from human electro-convulsive therapy (ECT)? Meat Science 90: 956–961. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.11.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar