Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-zzvtc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T10:13:41.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Humane euthanasia of neonates I: validation of the effectiveness of the Zephyr EXL non-penetrating captive-bolt euthanasia system on neonate piglets up to 10.9 kg live-weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

A Grist ,
JC Murrell ,
JL McKinstry ,
TG Knowles  and
SB Wotton
A Grist*
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, North Somerset BS40 5DU, UK
JC Murrell
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, North Somerset BS40 5DU, UK
JL McKinstry
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, North Somerset BS40 5DU, UK
TG Knowles
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, North Somerset BS40 5DU, UK
SB Wotton
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, North Somerset BS40 5DU, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: Andy.Grist@bristol.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To determine if mechanical blunt force trauma using a non-penetrating captive bolt was a viable method of producing an immediate stun/kill in neonate piglets (Sus scrofa domesticus) as an alternative to manual blunt force trauma. Piglets (n = 60) were acquired from a local producer and allocated to one of five weight ranges: birth weight to 3 kg (n = 12); 3 to 5 kg (n = 11); 5 to 7 kg (n = 13); 7 to 9 kg (n = 13); and 9 to 11 kg (n = 11). These piglets with an average live-weight of 6.1 kg were anaesthetised and electroencephalogram (EEG) recording electrodes inserted sub-dermally over the right cranium to allow recording of Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs). Following recording of baseline VEPs in the anaesthetised state, the piglet was shot once in the frontal-parietal position with a Bock Industries Zephyr EXL non-penetrating captive bolt powered by 120 psi air pressure. Movement scoring, behavioural indices of loss of brain function and VEPs were monitored throughout. VEPs were lost immediately in all piglets shot when the head was resting on a hard surface. This experiment demonstrates that mechanical blunt-force trauma, using a single-shot, non-penetrating captive bolt, such as the Zephyr EXL, provides for an immediate stun kill in neonate piglets up to 10.9 kg live-weight. This immediacy of action, combined with reproducible effects will improve the welfare of piglets to be subjected to on-farm euthanasia due to disease, ill-thrift or other commercial concerns.

Keywords

animal welfarecaptive bolteuthanasiamechanical stunningpigletVisual Evoked Potentials

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 111 - 120
Copyright
© 2017 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board Yearbook 2015 http://pork.ahdb.org.uk/media/271531/k11363-ahdb-pork-yearbook-for-digital-delivery-aw.pdfGoogle Scholar
Armstead, WM 1999 Cerebral hemodynamics after traumatic injury of immature brain. Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology 51:137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0940-2993(99)80087-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstead, WM and Kurth, CD 1994 Different cerebral hemo-dynamic responses following fluid percussion brain injury in the newborn and juvenile pig. Journal of Neurotrauma 11(5): 487–497. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1994.11.487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumer, T, Passalacqua, N, Powell, B, Newberry, W, Smith, W, Fenton, T and Haut, R 2010 Age dependent fracture char-acteristics of rigid and compliant surface impacts on the infant skull: A porcine model. Journal of Forensic Science 55(4): 993–997. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01391.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey-Trott, TM, Millman, ST, Turner, PV, Nykamp, SG, Lawless, PC and Widowski, TM 2014 Effectiveness of a non-pen-etrating captive bolt for euthanasia of 3Kg to 9Kg pigs. Journal of Animal Science 92: 5166–5174. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-7980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey-Trott, TM, Millman, ST, Turner, PV, Nykamp, SG and Widowski, TM 2013 Effectiveness of a non-penetrating captive bolt for euthanasia of piglets less than 3 d of age. Journal of Animal Science 91: 5477–5484. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, CC, Gregory, NG and Wotton, SB 1987 Captive bolt stunning of cattle: Effects on brain function and role of bolt veloc-ity. British Veterinary Journal 143: 574. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(87)90049-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döşemeci, L, Cengiz, M, Yılmaz, M and Ramazanoğlu, A 2004 Frequency of spinal reflex movements in brain-dead patients. Transplantation Proceedings 36: 17–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2003.11.049CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duhaime, AC, Margulies, SS, Durham, SR, O’Rourke, MM, Golden, JA, Marwaha, S and Raghupathi, R 2000 Maturation-dependent response of the piglet brain to scaled cortical impact. Journal of Neurosurgery 93: 455–462. https://doi.org/10.317 1/jns.2000.93.3.0455CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finnie, JW 1993 Brain damage caused by a captive bolt pistol. Journal of Comparative Pathology 109: 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9975(08)80250-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finnie, JW, Manavis, J, Summersides, GE and Blumbergs, PC 2003 Brain damage in pigs produced by impact with a non-penetrating captive bolt pistol. Australian Veterinary Journal 81(3): 153–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2003.tb11078.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, NG 1993 Euthanasia. The assessment of welfare and scientific aspects. World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences, Volume 26. Baltimore, USAGoogle Scholar
Gregory, NG 1998 Animal Welfare and Meat Science. CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Gregory, NG and Wotton, SB 1983 Studies on the central nervous system: visually evoked cortical responses in sheep. Research in Veterinary Science 34: 315–319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, NG and Wotton, SB 1984 Sheep slaughtering procedures 2. Time to loss of brain responsiveness after exsanguination or cardiac arrest. British Veterinary Journal 140: 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(84)90126-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerit, MJ 1999 Medical technology assessment: EEG and evoked potentials in the intensive care unit. Clinical Neurophysiology 29: 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0987-7053(99)90044-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, RL, Katayama, Y, Young, HF and Dunbar, JG 1988 Coma associated with flaccidity produced by fluid-percussion con-cussion in the cat part 1. Is it due to depression of activity within the brainstem reticular formation? Brain Injury 2: 31–49. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699058809150930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthis, JS 2004 Selected employee attributes and perceptions regarding methods and animal welfare concerns associated with swine euthanasia. PhD Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
Millman, ST 2010 Mechanical euthanasia methods – process and physiology. AASV Annual Meeting: Implementing Knowledge pp 443–446. 6-9 March 2010, Nebraska, USAGoogle Scholar
Mort, M, Convery, I, Baxter, J and Bailey, C 2008 Animal disease and human trauma: The psychosocial implications of the 2001 UK foot and mouth disease disaster. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare 11(2): 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888 700801925984CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ommaya, AK and Gennarelli, TA 1974 Cerebral concussion and traumatic unconsciousness. Brain 97: 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/97.1.633CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ommaya, AK, Grub, RL and Naumann, RA 1971 Coup and contra-coup injury: observations on the mechanics of visible brain injuries in the rhesus monkey. Journal of Neurosurgery 35: 503–516. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1971.35.5.0503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, BJ, Baumer, TG, Passalacqua, NV, Wagner, CD, Haut, RC, Fenton, TW and Yang, KH 2012 A Forensic Pathology Tool to Predict Pediatric Skull Fracture Patterns. Final Technical Report, US Department of Justice Award Number 2007-DN-BX-K196, Document Number 240683. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdf-files1/nij/grants/240683.pdfGoogle Scholar
Saposnik, G, Basile, VS and Young, GB 2009 Movements in brain death: A systematic review. Canadian Journal of Neurological Science 36: 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1017/S031716710000651XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saposnik, G, Bueri, JA, Mauriño, J, Saizar, R and Garretto, NS 2000 Spontaneous and reflex movements in brain death. American Academy of Neurology 54: 221. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.54.1.221CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saposnik, G, Mauriño, J, Saizar, R and Bueri, JA 2005 Spontaneous and reflex movements in 107 patients with brain death 2005. The American Journal of Medicine 118: 311–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.09.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, TM, McLeod, SR, Leggett, KEA and Gibson, TJ 2014 Evaluation of a spring-powered captive bolt gun for killing kanga-roo pouch young. Wildlife Research 41: 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR14094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, NA 2002 The neurophysiology of concussion. Progress in Neurobiology 67: 281–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(02)00018-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somjen, G 2001 Mechanisms of spreading depression and hypox-ic spreading depression-like depolarization. Physiological Reviews 81(3): 1065–1096CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spittler, JF, Wortmann, D, von Düring, M and Gehlen, W 2000 Phenomenlogical diversity of spinal reflexes in brain death. European Journal of Neurology 7: 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2000.00062.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turmel, A, Roux, A and Bojanowski, MW 1991 Spinal man after declaration of brain death. Neurosurgery 28: 298–301. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199102000-00021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urasaki, E, Tokimura, T, Kumai, J, Wada, S and Yokota, A 1992 Preserved spinal dorsal horn potentials in a brain dead patient with Lazarus’ sign. Case report. Journal of Neurosurgery 76:710–713. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1992.76.4.0710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, TL and Marion, CR 2011 Perpetration-induced trau-matic stress: A risk for veterinarians involved in the destruction of healthy animals. Canadian Veterinary Journal 52: 794–796Google Scholar
Whiting, TL, Steele, GG, Wamnes, S and Green, C 2011 Evaluation of methods of rapid mass killing of segregated early weaned piglets. Canadian Veterinary Journal 52(9): 753–758Google ScholarPubMed
Wijdicks, EFM 1995 Determining brain death in adults. Neurology 45: 1003–1011. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.45.5.1003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wotton, SB and Gregory, NG 1986 Pig slaughtering procedures: time to loss of brain responsiveness after exanguination or cardiac arrest. Research in Veterinary Science 40: 148–151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed