Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-7cdjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-17T23:35:32.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of databases, information centres and guidelines when planning research that may involve animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

AJ Smith  and
T Allen
AJ Smith*
Affiliation:
Laboratory Animal Unit, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Oslo, Norway
T Allen
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Information Center, US Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland, USA
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: adrian.smith@veths.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In many countries scientists planning research that may involve the use of animals are required by law to examine the possibilities for replacement, reduction or refinement (the Three Rs) of these experiments. In addition to the large number of literature databases, there are now many specialist databases specifically addressing the Three Rs. Information centres, with a mandate to assist scientists and lay people locate information on the Three Rs, have also been established. Email discussion lists and their archives constitute another, although less quality-controlled, source of information. Furthermore, guidelines for the care and use of animals in research have been produced both by regulatory bodies and scientific organisations. The growth of the internet has put an enormous amount of data into the public domain, and the problems of accessing relevant information are discussed. Suggestions are also given for search strategies when using these information sources.

Keywords

animal welfaredatabaseguidelinesinformation centrelaboratory animal welfareThree Rs

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , November 2005 , pp. 347 - 359
Copyright
© 2005 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

9 CFR 2005 Animals and Animal Products, Chapter 1 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture — Animal Welfare parts 1–4. US Government Printing Office: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Allen, T 1999 On-line databases: what is available? what is missing? Animal Welfare Information Center Bulletin 10: 11–14. http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/newsletters/v10n1/10n1alle.htm (accessed 28 September 2005)Google Scholar
Allen TA (ed) 2000 Information Resources for Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees 1985–1999. United States Department of Agriculture, Research Service National Agricultural Library, Animal Welfare Information Center: Baltimore, Maryland, USA. http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/pubs/IACUC/iacuc.htm (accessed 28 September 2005)Google Scholar
Allen, T, Crawford, R, Jensen, D, Adams, K, Goodman, G and Erickson, H 2004 For literature searches, is Medline enough? Response to protocol review scenario. Lab Animal 33: 15–16. http://www.labanimal.com/laban/journal/v33/n2/full/laban0204-15a.html (accessed 28 September 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AWIC (ed) 1998 AWIC Resource Series number 1. Directory of Resources on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences in 1998, 2nd Edition. AWIC: Beltsville, Maryland, USA. http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/newsletters/v9n1/9n1new.htm (accessed 27 September 2005)Google Scholar
Bergman, MK 2001 The deep web: surfacing hidden value. The Journal of Electronic Publishing 7(1). http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/07-01/bergman.html (accessed 28 September 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottrill, KA 1999 Guide to Searching for Alternatives to the Use of Laboratory Animals, FRAME (Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments), UK. http://www.frame.org.uk/Searching%20for%20Information/Search%20Guide%20Index.htm (accessed 28 September 2005)Google Scholar
Brattelid, T and Smith, AJ 2000 Guidelines for reporting the results of fish experiments. Laboratory Animals 34: 131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grune, B, Fallon, M, Howard, C, Hudson, V, Kulpa-Eddy, JA, Larson, J, Leary, S, Roi, A, van der Valk, J, Wood, M, Dörendahl, A, Köhler-Hahn, D, Box, R and Spielmann, H 2004 Report and recommendations of the international workshop ‘Retrieval Approaches for Information on Alternative Methods to Animal Experiments’. ALTEX 21: 115–127. http://www.altex.ch/pdf/artikel/altex_3_2004_Grune.pdf (accessed 28 September 2005)Google ScholarPubMed
ILAR 2001 Fish Models in Biomedical Research. ILAR Journal 42(4)Google Scholar
ILAR 2005 Immunization Procedures and Adjuvant Products. ILAR Journal 46(3)Google Scholar
Information Managers in the Pharmaceutical Industry 2002 Searching for 3Rs information–published literature sources. http://www.impi.org.uk/i3r_v2_jul2002.pdf (accessed 28 September 2005)Google Scholar
Janusch, A, van der Kamp, M, Bottrill, K, Grune, B, Anderson, DC, Ekwall, B, Howald, M, Kolar, R, Kuiper, HJD, Larson, J, Loprieno, G, Sauer, UG, Smith, AJ and van der Valk, JBF 1997 Current status and future developments of databases on alternative methods. The Report and Recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 25. ATLA 25: 411–422Google Scholar
Kreger, MD 1997 Why conduct literature searches for alternatives? ASLAP Newsletter (American Society of Laboratory Animal Practitioners) 30: 19–23. http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/alternatives/aslap.htm (accessed 28 September 2005)Google Scholar
Kreger, MD 1999 The literature search for alternatives. In: Podolsky, ML and Lukas, VS (eds) The Care and Feeding of an IACUC: The Organization and Management of an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee pp 139–152. CRC Press: Boca Raton, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
Langley, G, Broadhead, C, Bottrill, K, Combes, R, Ewbank, R, Hawkins, P, Hubrecht, R, Jennings, M, Newman, C, Rowe, S, Southtree, J, Todd, M and Ward, L 1999 Accessing information on the reduction, refinement and replacement of animal experiments. ATLA 27: 239–245Google ScholarPubMed
Larson, JA, Anderson, DC, Ungar, K and Stark, P 1995 Directory of Resources on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences. Animal Welfare Information Center: Beltsvile, Maryland, USAGoogle Scholar
Prescott MJ (ed) 2004 Refining dog husbandry and care. Eighth report of BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement. Laboratory Animals 38, Suppl 1Google Scholar
Russell, WMS and Burch, RL 1959 (reprinted 1992) The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Wheathampstead, UKGoogle Scholar
Shevell, JL and James, ML 1995 Search for animal alternatives and the role of the information specialist. Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science 34: 65–68Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, C 1994 AWIC tips for searching for alternatives to animal research and testing. Lab Animal 23: 46–48. http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/alternatives/tips.htm (accessed 28 September 2005)Google Scholar
Smith, AJ and Smith, K 2004 Guidelines for humane education: alternatives to the use of animals in teaching and training. Proceedings of the Fourth World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences, New Orleans, 2002. ATLA 32, Suppl 1A: 29-39. http://www.worldcongress.net/2002/proceedings/SP4%20Smith.pdf (accessed 28 September 2005)Google Scholar
Snow, B 1990 Online searching for alternatives to animal testing Online pp 94-97 ISBN 0146 5422Google Scholar
Stokes, WS and Jensen, DJB 1995 Guidelines for institutional animal care and use committees: consideration of alternatives. Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science 34: 51–55, 58-60Google ScholarPubMed
United States Department of Agriculture 2000 Animal Care Policy Manual, Policy #12 — Consideration of Alternatives to Painful/Distressful Procedures. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ac/policy/policy12.pdf (accessed 28 September 2005)Google Scholar
Wood, MW and Hart, LA 2001 Searching for the 3Rs: facilitating compliance in the bibliographic search for alternatives. INSPEL (International Journal of Special Libraries) 35: 191–198Google Scholar
Working Committee for the Biological Characterization of Laboratory Animals/GV SOLAS (Gesellschaft für Versuchstierkunde Society for Laboratory Animal Science) 1985 Guidelines for specification of animals and husbandry methods when reporting the results of animal experiments. Laboratory Animals 19: 106–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar