No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
An examination of nest-building behaviour using five different nesting materials in C57BL/6J and BALB/c mice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2023
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The aim of our study was to assess the nest-building behaviour of two mouse (Mus musculus) strains using different nesting materials and examine possible sex- and housing-specific effects. Adult mice of two strains (C57BL/6J; n = 64 and BALB/cAnNCrl; n = 99) were randomly allocated to the following housing groups: single-housed male, single-housed female, pair-housed male and pair-housed female. One of the following nest-building materials was placed in each home-cage in a random order: nestlets (Plexx BV, The Netherlands), cocoons (Carfil, Belgium), wooden wool, crinklets and compact (all three, Safe, Germany). The following day, nests were rated applying a nest-scoring scale ranging from 0 to 10, the nests were removed, and a different nest-building material provided. In both tested strains, nestlets achieved the highest nest-building scores when compared to the other four nest-building materials. All nest-building materials scored higher in BALB/c mice compared to C57BL/6J animals reaching statistical significance in crinklets only. Sex comparison revealed that female C57BL/6J mice only scored significantly higher using crinklets than males and BALB/c female mice were rated significantly higher using wooden wool, cocoons and compact than their male counterparts. While pair-housed C57BL/6J animals built higher-rated nests than single-housed mice in the C57BL/6J strain in all five materials tested, the scores were not significantly different in the BALB/c strain. Results of the present study reveal significant strain-, sex- and housing-related influences on the complexity of nests using different standardised building materials. Such observations need to be taken into account when planning the optimal enrichment programme for laboratory animals.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2021 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare
References
Andre, V, Gau, C, Scheideler, A, Aguilar-Pimentel, JA, Amarie, OV, Becker, L, Garrett, L, Hans, W, Holter, SM, Janik, D, Moreth, K, Neff, F, Ostereicher, M, Racz, I, Rathkolb, B, Rozman, J, Bekeredjian, R, Graw, J, Klingenspor, M, Klopstock, T, Ollert, M, Schmidt-Weber, C, Wolf, E, Wurst, W, Gailus-Durner, V, Brielmeier, M, Fuchs, H and Hrabe de Angelis, M 2018 Laboratory mouse housing conditions can be improved using common environmental enrichment without com-promising data. Public Library of Science Biology 16: e2005019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005019Google ScholarPubMed
Aske, KC and Waugh, CA 2017 Expanding the 3R principles: More rigour and transparency in research using animals. European Molecular Biology Organisation Reports 18: 1490–1492. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201744428Google ScholarPubMed
Aujnarain, AB, Luo, OD, Taylor, N, Lai, JKY and Foster, JA 2018 Effects of exercise and enrichment on behaviour in CD-1 mice. Behavioural Brain Research 342: 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2018.01.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailoo, JD, Murphy, E, Boada-Sana, M, Varholick, JA, Hintze, S, Baussiere, C, Hahn, KC, Gopfert, C, Palme, R, Voelkl, B and Wurbel, H 2018 Effects of cage enrichment on behavior, wel-fare and outcome variability in female mice. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 12: 232. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumans, V 2005 Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents and rabbits: requirements of rodents, rabbits, and research. Institute for Laboratory Research Journal 46: 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.46.2.162Google ScholarPubMed
Bayne, K 2018 Environmental enrichment and mouse models: Current perspectives. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine 1: 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/ame2.12015Google ScholarPubMed
Bayne, K and Wurbel, H 2014 The impact of environmental enrichment on the outcome variability and scientific validity of laboratory animal studies. Revue Scientifique et Technique 33: 273–280. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.33.1.2282CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benn, DM 1995 Innovations in research animal care. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 206: 465–468Google ScholarPubMed
Bult, A and Lynch, CB 1997 Nesting and fitness: lifetime reproductive success in house mice bidirectionally selected for thermoregulatory nest-building behavior. Behavior Genetics 27: 231–240CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deacon, RM 2006 Assessing nest building in mice. Nature Protocols 1: 1117–1119. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.170CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Union 2010 Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. EU: Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Garthe, A, Roeder, I and Kempermann, G 2016 Mice in an enriched environment learn more flexibly because of adult hip-pocampal neurogenesis. Hippocampus 26: 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskill, BN, Gordon, CJ, Pajor, EA, Lucas, JR, Davis, JK and Garner, JP 2012 Heat or insulation: behavioral titration of mouse preference for warmth or access to a nest. Public Library of Science One 7: e32799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032799Google ScholarPubMed
Goto, T, Okayama, T and Toyoda, A 2015 Strain differences in temporal changes of nesting behaviors in C57BL/6N, DBA/2N, and their F1 hybrid mice assessed by a three-dimensional monitoring system. Behavioural Processes 119: 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.07.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hess, SE, Rohr, S, Dufour, BD, Gaskill, BN, Pajor, EA and Garner, JP 2008 Home improvement: C57BL/6J mice given more naturalistic nesting materials build better nests. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 47: 25–31Google ScholarPubMed
Jirkof, P, Cesarovic, N, Rettich, A, Fleischmann, T and Arras, M 2012 Individual housing of female mice: influence on postsurgi-cal behaviour and recovery. Laboratory Animals 46: 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1258/la.2012.012027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jirkof, P, Fleischmann, T, Cesarovic, N, Rettich, A, Vogel, J and Arras, M 2013 Assessment of postsurgical distress and pain in lab-oratory mice by nest complexity scoring. Laboratory Animals 47: 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677213475603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaliste, EK, Mering, SM and Huuskonen, HK 2006 Environmental modification and agonistic behavior in NIH/S male mice: nesting material enhances fighting but shelters prevent it. Comparative Medicine 56: 202–208Google Scholar
Keisala, T, Minasyan, A, Jarvelin, U, Wang, J, Hamalainen, T, Kalueff, AV and Tuohimaa, P 2007 Aberrant nest building and prolactin secretion in vitamin D receptor mutant mice. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biolology 104: 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.03.031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, MJ, Han, KH, Yum, MS and Lee, PCW 2019 Early-stage paired housing improves social interaction in neuronal Uba6-defi-cient mice. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Commununications 514: 545–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.04.167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koo, TK and Li, MY 2016 A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 15: 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latham, N and Mason, G 2004 From house mouse to mouse house: the behavioural biology of free-living Mus musculus and its implications in the laboratory. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 86: 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijam, N, Paylor, R, McDonald, MP, Crawley, JN, Deng, CX, Herrup, K, Stevens, KE, Maccaferri, G, McBain, CJ, Sussman, DJ and Wynshaw-Boris, A 1997 Social interaction and sensori-motor gating abnormalities in mice lacking Dvl1. Cell 90: 895–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80354-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrum-Gardner, E 2008 Which is the correct statistical test to use? British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 46: 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.09.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council 2011 Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. NRC: Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Olsson, IA and Dahlborn, K 2002 Improving housing conditions for laboratory mice: a review of ‘environmental enrichment.’ Laboratory Animals 36: 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367702320162379CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schander, JA, Aisemberg, J, Correa, F, Wolfson, ML, Juriol, L, Cymeryng, C, Jensen, F and Franchi, AM 2020 The enrichment of maternal environment prevents pre-term birth in a mice model. Reproduction 159: 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-19-0572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwabe, K, Boldt, L, Bleich, A, van Dijk, RM, Helgers, SOA, Hager, C, Nowakowska, M, Riedesel, AK, Schonhoff, K, Struve, B, Wittek, J and Potschka, H 2020 Nest-building per-formance in rats: impact of vendor, experience, and sex. Laboratory Animals 54: 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677219862004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, CM 1997 Observations on the prevalence of nest-building in non-breeding TO strain mice and their use of two nesting materials. Laboratory Animals 31: 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367797780600134CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suemaru, K, Yoshikawa, M, Aso, H and Watanabe, M 2018 Environmental enrichment alleviates cognitive and behavioral impairments in EL mice. Epilepsy Behaviour 85: 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.06.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van de Weerd, HA, Baumans, V, Koolhaas, JM and Van Zutphen, LF 1994 Strain specific behavioural response to environmental enrich-ment in the mouse. Journal of Experimental Animal Science 36: 117–127Google Scholar
Van de Weerd, HA, Van Loo, PL, Van Zutphen, LF, Koolhaas, JM and Baumans, V 1997 Preferences for nesting material as environmental enrichment for laboratory mice. Laboratory Animals 31: 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367797780600152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Loo, PL and Baumans, V 2004 The importance of learning young: the use of nesting material in laboratory rats. Laboratory Animals 38: 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1258/00236770460734353Google Scholar
Van Oortmerssen, GA 1971 Biological significance, genetics and evolutionary origin of variability in behaviour within and between inbred strains of mice (Mus musculus). A behaviour genetic study. Behaviour 38: 1–92. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853971X00014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wirz, A, Mandillo, S, D’Amato, FR, Giuliani, A and Riviello, MC 2015 Response, use and habituation to a mouse house in C57BL/6J and BALB/c mice. Experimental Animals 64: 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim.14-0104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfer, DP, Litvin, O, Morf, S, Nitsch, RM, Lipp, HP and Wurbel, H 2004 Laboratory animal welfare: cage enrichment and mouse behaviour. Nature 432: 821–822. https://doi.org/10.1038/432821aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Würbel, H and Garner, J 2007 Refinement of rodent research through environmental enrichment and systematic randomization. The National Centre for the 3Rs 9: 1–9Google Scholar
Xiong, XD, Xiong, WD, Xiong, SS and Chen, GH 2018 Age- and gender-based differences in nest-building behavior and learning and memory performance measured using a radial six-armed water maze in C57BL/6 mice. Behavioural Neurology 2018: 8728415CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obermueller et al. supplementary material
File
2.2 MB
Obermueller et al. supplementary material
File
499.9 KB
You have
Access