Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:22:39.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing the welfare of dairy calves: outcome-based measures of calf health versus input-based measures of the use of risky management practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

E Vasseur*
Affiliation:
Organic Dairy Research Center, University of Guelph-Alfred Campus, Alfred, Ontario, Canada K0B 1A0 Department of Animal Sciences, Laval University, Quebec, Canada, G1K 7P4 Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Agassiz, British Columbia, Canada, V0M 1A0
D Pellerin
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Laval University, Quebec, Canada, G1K 7P4
AM de Passillé
Affiliation:
Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Agassiz, British Columbia, Canada, V0M 1A0
C Winckler
Affiliation:
Division of Livestock Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), A-1180 Vienna, Austria
BJ Lensink
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Comportement Animal et Système d’Exploitation (CASE), Institut Supérieur d’Agriculture (ISA), 59046 Lille, France
U Knierim
Affiliation:
Department of Farm Animal Behaviour and Husbandry, University of Kassel, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
J Rushen
Affiliation:
Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Agassiz, British Columbia, Canada, V0M 1A0
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: vasseur.elsa@gmail.com

Abstract

The mortality and morbidity of unweaned dairy calves and management practices that may impair calf health and welfare were surveyed on 115 farms in Canada (Quebec) and 60 farms in Central Europe (Austria and Germany) to examine whether outcome-based measures of calf health could be used to identify farms that use management practices that place calf health at risk. Quebec herds had higher juvenile mortality incidence than those in Central Europe. Juvenile mortality was poorly estimated by producers. Low levels of mortality did not include low levels of morbidity in the same herds. Health status was not necessarily associated with management practices generally recommended for health and welfare. Many management practices that may impair calf health and welfare were found in Quebec while only some were found in Central Europe; these were related to calving management and care of the newborn, colostrum management, calf-dam separation, calf feeding, weaning and calf housing. Inadequate recording of calf morbidity and mortality can be a problem in using recorded measures to assess the level of calf health on a farm. The recorded mortality and morbidity do not necessarily show the extent that producers use management practices that pose a risk to calf health.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, PD 1999 Logistic Regression Using the SAS System: Theory and Application. SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
Blokhuis, HJ, Veissier, I, Miele, M and Jones, B 2010 The welfare quality® project and beyond: safeguarding farm animal well-being. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A: Animal Sciences 60: 129140Google Scholar
Dairy Farmers of Canada 2009 Code of Practice for the Care and Handling of Dairy Cattle. Dairy Farmers of Canada: Ottawa, ON, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Drackley, JR 2008 Calf nutrition from birth to weaning. The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Food Animal Practice 24: 5586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulliksen, SM, Lie, KI, L⊘ken, T and Østerås, O 2009a Calf mortality in Norwegian dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 27822795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulliksen, SM, KI, Lie and Østerås, O 2009b Calf health monitoring in Norwegian dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 16601669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knierim, U and Winckler, C 2009 On-farm welfare assessment in cattle: validity, reliability and feasibility issues and future perspectives with special regard to the Welfare Quality® approach. Animal Welfare 18: 451458Google Scholar
Le Blanc, SJ, Lissemore, KD, Kelton, DF, Duffield, TF and Leslie, KE 2006 Major advances in disease prevention in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 12671279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OIE 2008 Introduction to Recommendations for Animal Welfare. Chapter 7.1 Terrestrial Animal Health Code 2008. World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE): Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
Pellerin, D and Gilbert, D 2008 La gestion des coûts de remplacement. In Guide bovins laitiers. Comité Bovins laitiers pp 3344. Centre de référence en agriculture et agroalimentaire du Québec: Quebec, Canada. [Title translation: Managing rearing costs]Google Scholar
Pettersson, K, Svensson, C and Liberg, P 2001 Housing, feeding and management of calves and replacement heifers in Swedish dairy herds. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A: Animal Sciences 42: 465478Google ScholarPubMed
Ribo, O and Serratosa, J 2009 History and procedural aspects of the animal welfare risk assessment at EFSA. In: Smulders FJM and Algers B (eds) The Assessment and Management of Risks for the Welfare of Production Animals. Food Safety Assurance and Veterinary Public Health, Volume 5 pp 305335. Wageningen Academic Press: Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Rushen, J and de Passillé, AM 2009 The scientific basis of animal welfare indicators. In: Smulders, FJM and Algers, B (eds) The Assessment and Management of Risks for the Welfare of Production Animals. Food Safety Assurance and Veterinary Public Health, Volume 5. Wageningen Academic Press: Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Rushen, J, de Passillé, AM, von Keyserlingk, MAG and Weary, DM 2008 The Welfare of Cattle. Springer: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandgren, CH, Lindbergand, A and Keeling, LJ 2009 Using a national dairy database to identify herds with poor welfare. Animal Welfare 18: 523532Google Scholar
Selim, SA and Cullor, JS 1997 Number of viable bacteria and presumptive antibiotic residues in milk fed to calves on commercial dairies. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 211: 10291035Google ScholarPubMed
Shamay, AD, Werner, U, Moallem, H, Barash, and Bruckental, I 2005 Effect of nursing management and skeletal size at weaning on puberty, skeletal growth rate, and milk production during first lactation of dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 88: 14601469CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svensson, C, Linder, A and Olsson, SO 2006 Mortality in Swedish dairy calves and replacement heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 47694777CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
USDA 2008 Dairy 2007, Part III: Reference of Dairy Cattle Health and Management Practices in the United States, 2007. USDA-APHIS-VS, CEAH. Fort Collins, CO #N482.0908. USDA: USAGoogle Scholar
Vaarst, M and S⊘rensen, JT 2009 Danish dairy farmers’ perceptions and attitudes related to calf-management in situations of high versus no calf mortality. Preventative Veterinary Medicine 89: 128133CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasseur, EJ, Borderas, F, Cue, RI, Lefebvre, D, Pellerin, D, Rushen, J, Wade, KM and de Passillé, AM 2010a A survey of dairy calf management practices in Canada that impact animal welfare. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 13071315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasseur, EJ, Rushen, J, de Passillé, AM, Lefebvre, D and Pellerin, D 2010b An advisory tool to improve management practices affecting calf and heifer welfare on dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 44144426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, DM, Tyler, JW, Van Metre, DC, Hostetler, DE and Barrington, GM 2000 Passive transfer of colostral immunoglobulins in calves. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 14: 569577CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winckler, C, Gratzer, E, Lensink, J, Schulze Westerath, H, Vasseur, E and Knierim, U 2008 Welfare assessment of dairy calves in the Welfare Quality® project. In: Lund, V and Mejdell, CM (eds) Calf Welfare in Organic Herds, Planning for the Future. Proceedings from an ANIPLAN Workshop. National Veterinary Institute pp 2326. 30 March-1 April, 2008, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar