Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-rbv74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-18T13:00:53.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

By your side: How social support affects training duration, task performance and behaviour of pigs in a Judgement Bias Task – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2025

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Corrigendum
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Upon publication of Kroell M, Winckler C and Hintze S (2025) the term ‘SOC’ and ‘ISO’ were transposed twice in the 2nd paragraph on page 14, under the heading Behaviour during training and testing

The correct section should read

In line with Kanitz et al. (2014), who described that social isolation leads to behavioural and physiological stress responses in pigs, we found that ISO pigs showed more signs of stress compared to SOC pigs. All six behaviours indicative of stress, namely high-pitched Vocalisation, Freezing, Exit Approaching Behaviour, Heavy Escape Attempts, Defaecation and Urination were more frequently shown by ISO than SOC pigs. Moreover, ISO pigs showed Exit Approaching Behaviour for longer than SOC pigs.

References

Kroell, M, Winckler, C and Hintze, S (2025). By your side: How social support affects training duration, task performance and behaviour of pigs in a Judgement Bias Task. Animal Welfare, 34, e25, 116 https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2025.21CrossRefGoogle Scholar