Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-j7khd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T07:01:50.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Different Degrees of Social Isolation on the Behaviour of Weaned Piglets Kept for Experimental Purposes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

M S Herskin  and
K H Jensen
M S Herskin*
Affiliation:
Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health & Welfare, Research Centre Foulum, P O Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
K H Jensen
Affiliation:
Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health & Welfare, Research Centre Foulum, P O Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of degree of isolation on the behaviour of weaned piglets was investigated using eight replicates of littermates, weaned at 4 weeks and caged for 2 weeks in metabolism chambers under varying degrees of isolation: i) fully isolated without physical contact with littermates; ii) partly isolated with limited physical contact with littermates; or iii) grouped with three littermates. The behaviour of the piglets was video recorded from 0700h-2230h on days 1, 6 and 13 post-weaning. In addition, a test of behavioural reactivity towards a novel environment/object was performed on day 8.

Irrespective of degree, isolation initially increased the occurrence of behavioural indicators of stress such as the frequency of pawing and escape attempts as well as decreasing the frequency of play. In partly isolated piglets this initial response was more active than in fully isolated piglets, indicating an increased frustration with isolation. Within 2 weeks, however, the stress response in partly isolated piglets had almost completely waned, and they showed only a decreased frequency of play behaviour, whereas in fully isolated piglets an increased frequency of pawing as well as a more pronounced reduction of play behaviour were still evident on day 13. Both isolation treatments resulted in markedly lower reactivity in a novel environment, seen as fewer squares crossed and fewer vocalizations.

It is concluded that social isolation of newly weaned piglets is stressful. Although it may increase the initial stress response, provision of social contact with littermates, eg through wire mesh, might limit negative long-term effects of isolation in experiments where data collection requires individual housing.

Keywords

animal welfarebehavioural reactivityhousingmetabolism chambernoveltystress

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , August 2000 , pp. 237 - 249
Copyright
© 2000 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barnes, R H, Levitsky, D A, Pond, W G and Moore, U 1976 Effect of postnatal dietary protein and energy restriction on exploratory behaviour in young pigs. Developmental Psychobiology 9: 425–435CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, J L, Cronin, G M and Winfield, C G 1981 The effects of individual and group penning on total and free plasma corticosteroids and the maximum corticosteroid binding capacity. General and Comparative Endocrinology 44: 219–225CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackshaw, J K 1981 Some behavioural deviations in weaned domestic pigs: persistent inguinal nose thrusting, and tail and ear biting. Animal Production 33: 325–332Google Scholar
Dybkjær, L 1992 The identification of behavioural indicators of ‘stress’ in early weaned piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D 1978 Observations on the behavioural development of suckling and early-weaned piglets during the first six weeks after birth. Animal Behaviour 26: 22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundlach, H 1968 Brutfìirsorge, Brutpflege, Verhaltensontogenese und Tagesperiodik beim europäischen Wildschwein. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 25: 955–995Google Scholar
Heller, K E and Jeppesen, L L 1985 Behaviour and eosinophil leukocyte responses to single and repeated immobility stress in mink. Scientifur 9: 174–178Google Scholar
Hutton, R C and Wood-Gush, D G M 1983 Abnormal behaviour of piglets reared in individual incubators. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 11: 83–84Google Scholar
Jensen, K H, Pedersen, L J, Giersing Hagelsø, A M, Heller, K E, Jørgensen, E and Ladewig, J 1995a Intermittent stress in pigs: behavioural and pituitaiy-adrenocortical reactivity. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica. Section A, Animal Science 45: 276–285Google Scholar
Jensen, K H, Pedersen, L J, Nielsen, E K, Heller, K E, Ladewig, J and Jørgensen, E 1996 Intermittent stress in the pig: effects on behaviour, HPA-axis, growth and gastric ulceration. Physiology and Behaviour 59: 741–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P, Forkman, B, Thodberg, K and Köster, E 1995b Individual variation and consistency in piglet behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 45: 43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinbaum, D G 1996 Survival Analysis - A Self-learning Text. Springer Verlag: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littell, R C, Milliken, G A, Stroup, W W and Wolfinger, R S 1996 SAS® System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute Inc: Cary, USAGoogle Scholar
Martin, P and Bateson, P P G 1986 Measuring Behaviour - An Introductory Guide. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. UKGoogle Scholar
Metz, J H M and Gonyou, H W 1990 Effect of age and housing conditions on the behavioural and haemolytic reaction of piglets to weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 27: 299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, J H M and Osterlee, C C 1981 Immunologische und etologische Kriterien für die artgemässe Haltung von Sauen und Ferkeln. KTBL-Schrift 264: 39–50Google Scholar
Munksgaard, L and Jensen, M B 1996 The use of open-field tests in the assessment of welfare of cattle. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica. Section A, Animal Science 27: 82–85Google Scholar
Newberry, R, Wood-Gush, D G M and Hall, J W 1988 Playful behaviour of piglets. Behavioural Processes 17: 205–216CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearce, G P and Paterson, A M 1993 The effect of space restriction and provision of toys during rearing on the behaviour, productivity and physiology of male pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36: 11–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, V 1994 The development of feeding and investigatory behaviour in free-ranging domestic pigs during their first 18 weeks of life. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42: 87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc 1996 SAS/STAT User Guide, Version 6.12. SAS Institute Inc: Cary, USAGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S and Castellan, N J 1988 Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. McGraw-Hill: SingaporeGoogle Scholar
Sudha, S and Pradhan, N 1993 Behavioural consequences of predictable vs. unpredictable shocks in rats. Physiology and Behaviour 54: 243–247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thodberg, K, Jensen, K H and Herskin, M S 1999 A general reaction pattern across situations in pre-pubertal gilts. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 63: 103–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Adrichem, P W M and Vogt, J E 1993 The effect of isolation and separation on the metabolism of sheep. Livestock Production Science 33: 151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderschuren, L J M J, Stein, E A, Wiegant, V M and Van Ree, J M 1995 Social isolation and social interaction alter regional brain opioid receptor binding in rats. European Neuropsychopharmacology 5: 119–127CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varley, M A 1995 Behavioural patterns of the weaned piglet. Pig Journal 34: 71–97Google Scholar
Veissier, I, Chazal, P, Pradel, P and Le Neindre, P 1997 Providing social contact and objects for nibbling moderates reactivity and oral behaviours in veal calves. Journal of Animal Science 75: 356–365CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Borell, E and Hurnik, J F 1991 Stereotypic behaviour, adrenocortical function, and open-field behaviour of individually confined gestating sows. Physiology & Behavior 49: 709–713CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Borell, E and Ladewig, J 1992 Relationship between behaviour and adrenocortical response pattern in domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34: 195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worobec, E K, Duncan, I J H and Widowski, T M 1998 The behaviour and performance of piglets weaned at three ages. Journal of Animal Science 76, Suppl. 1: 385Google Scholar