Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T23:40:54.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using the Mesh Ceiling as a Food Puzzle to Encourage Foraging Behaviour in Caged Rhesus Macaques (Macaca Mulatta)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

V Reinhardt
V Reinhardt*
Affiliation:
Wisconsin Regional Primate Research Center, 1223 Capitol Court, Madison, WI 53715, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An attempt was made to encourage more foraging behaviour in eight pair-housed adult rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). No special device and no special food were used Daily commercial dry food rations (238g per animal) consisting of 33 bar-shaped or 16 star-shaped biscuits per animal were placed on the mesh ceiling of the cages instead of in the feed-boxes. This induced an 80-fold increase (17.0 vs 1362.9s) and 289-fold increase (12.3 vs 3551.4s), respectively, in foraging time. The animals spent on average 9.6 per cent and 24.7 per cent respectively, of four-hour observation sessions foraging for biscuits from the mesh ceiling. Working for their food did not discourage them from eating all left-overs in the course of a day regardless of the shape of the biscuits.

It was concluded that the new feeding procedure enhanced the animals’ behavioural well-being by encouraging foraging activities thereby helping to counteract understimulation.

Keywords

animal welfarebehavioural well-beingforaginghousingrhesus macaques
Type
Short Communication
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , May 1993 , pp. 165 - 172
Copyright
© 1993 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayne, K, Mainzer, H, Dexter, S, Campbell, G, Yamada, F and Suomi, S 1991 The reduction of abnormal behavior in individually housed rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) with a foraging/grooming board. American Journal of Primatology 23: 23–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayne, K, Dexter, S, Mainzer, H, McCully, C, Campbell, G and Yamada, F 1992 The use of artificial turf as a foraging substrate for individually housed rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Animal Welfare 1: 39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, K R and Cook, M 1989 Environmental enrichment: behavioral responses of rhesus to puzzle feeders. Lab Animal 18(5): 25–31Google Scholar
Evans, H L, Taylor, J D, Ernst, J and Gracfe, J F 1989 Methods to evaluate the well-being of laboratory primates: comparisons of macaques and tamarins. Laboratory Animal Science 39: 318–323Google ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, G A 1966 Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. McGraw Hill: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Gilloux, I, Gurnell, J and Shepherdson, D 1992 An enrichment device for great apes. Animal Welfare 1: 279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullekson, R, Bench, L, Harrigan, K and Pyle, K 1991 Seed-feeder as a foraging device for singly housed cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Lab Animal 20 (6): 44–46Google Scholar
Heath, S, Shimoji, M, Tumanguil, J and Crockett, C 1992 Peanut puzzle solvers quickly demonstrate aptitude. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 31(1): 12–13Google Scholar
Lam, K, Rupniak, N M J and Iversen, S D 1991 Use of a grooming and foraging substrate to reduce stereotypies in macaques. Journal of Medical Primatology 20: 104–109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Line, S W and Houghton, P 1987 Influence of an environmental enrichment device on general behavior and appetite in rhesus macaques. Laboratory Animal Science 37: 508 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Line, S W and Morgan, K N 1991 The effects of two novel objects on the behavior of singly caged adult rhesus macaques. Laboratory Animal Science 41: 365–369Google ScholarPubMed
Line, S W, Markowitz, H, Morgan, K N and Strong, S 1989 Evaluation of attempts to enrich the environment of single-caged nonhuman primates. In Driscoll J W (ed) Animal Care and Use in Behavioral Research: Regulations, Issues and Applications pp 103-117. National Agricultural Libraiy: Beltsville Malik 11986 Time budgets and activity patterns in free-ranging rhesus monkeys. In Else J G and Lee P C (eds) Primate Ecology and Conservation ppl05-114. Cambridge University Press: CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Malik, I and Southwick, C 1988 Feeding behavior and activity patterns of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) at Tughlaqabad, India. In Fa, J E and Southwick, C (eds) Ecology and Behavior of Food-Enhanced Primate Groups pp 95–111. Alan R Liss: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, H and Line, S 1989 Primate research models and environmental enrichment. In Segal, E F (ed) Housing, Care and Psychological Well-Being of Captive and Laboratory Primates pp 202–212. Noyes Publications: Park RidgeGoogle Scholar
Marriott, B M 1988 Time budgets of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in a forest habitat in Nepal and on Cayo Santiago. In Fa J E and Southwick C (eds) Ecology and Behavior of Food-Enhanced Primate Groups ppl25-149. Alan R liss: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Meunier, L D, Duktig, J T and Landi, M S 1989 Modification of stereotypic behavior in rhesus monkeys using videotapes, puzzlefeeders, and foraging boxes. Laboratory Animal Science 39: 479 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Moazed, T C and Wolff, A V 1988 The raisin board as an environmental enrichment tool for laboratory primates. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 27(1): 16Google Scholar
Murchison, M A 1991 PVC-pipe food puzzle for singly caged primates. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 30(3): 12–14Google Scholar
Murchison, M A 1992 Task-oriented feeding device for singly caged primates. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 31(1): 9–11Google Scholar
O’Kccffe, R T and Lifshitz, K 1985 A behavioral profile for stumptail macaques (Macaca arctoides). Primates 26: 143–160Google Scholar
O’Neill, P 1988 Developing effective social and environmental enrichment strategies for macaques in captive groups. Lab Animal 17(4): 23–36Google Scholar
Preilowski, B, Reger, M and Engele, H 1988 Combining scientific experimentation with conventional housing: a pilot study with rhesus monkeys. American Journal of Primatology 14: 223–234CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinhardt, V 1992 Foraging for commercial chow. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 31(2): 10Google Scholar
Seth, P K and Seth, S 1986 Ecology and behaviour of rhesus monkeys in India. In Else, J G and Lee, P C (eds) Primate Ecology and Conservation pp 89–103. Cambridge University Press: CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Teas, H, Richie, T, Taylor, H and Southwick, C 1980 Population patterns and behavioral ecology of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in Nepal. In Lindburg, D G (ed) The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior and Evolution pp 247–262. Van Nostrand Reinhold: New YorkGoogle Scholar
The Random House Dictionary of the English Language, 2nd Edition 1987 Random House: New YorkGoogle Scholar
US Department of Agriculture 1991 Animal Welfare, Standards, Final Rule. Federal Register 56: 6426–6505Google Scholar