Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T22:09:52.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Foraging black-browed albatrosses target waters overlaying moraine banks - a consequence of upward benthic-pelagic coupling?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2012

Ewan D. Wakefield*
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
Richard A. Phillips
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
Mark Belchier
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK


Wide-ranging, surface-feeding pelagic seabirds are the most numerous functional group of birds in the Southern Ocean. The mesoscale habitat use of these birds is increasingly being quantified by relating their movements to remotely sensed, near surface properties of the ocean. However, prey availability at the sea surface may also be determined by habitat characteristics not measurable from space. For instance, benthic-pelagic coupling, which occurs when seabed processes affect productivity in the epipelagic zone, can link benthic habitat type to availability of surface prey. We combined acoustically derived maps of the substrate of the South Georgia shelf with GPS tracking to quantify the sub-mesoscale habitat use of breeding black-browed albatrosses. We show that albatrosses preferentially used waters overlaying glacial moraine banks near the shelf edge and that this was unrelated to the presence of trawlers targeting mackerel icefish, which are also associated with these features. Stomach temperature profiles suggest that albatrosses primarily caught krill and fish over the banks. We hypothesize that black-browed albatrosses target waters overlaying moraine banks due to upward benthic-pelagic coupling, mediated by an increase in abundance of zooplankton such as Antarctic krill. Our findings suggest that the potential effects of such processes on pelagic seabird distribution warrant wider investigation.

Biological Sciences
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Aarts, G., MacKenzie, M., McConnell, B., Fedak, M.Matthiopoulos, J. 2008. Estimating space-use and habitat preference from wildlife telemetry data. Ecography, 31, 140160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A., Whitehouse, M.J., Priddle, J., Cripps, G.C., Ward, P.Brandon, M.A. 2001. South Georgia, Antarctica: a productive, cold water, pelagic ecosystem. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 216, 279308.Google Scholar
Barnes, D.K.A. 2008. A benthic richness hotspot in the Southern Ocean: slope and shelf cryptic benthos of Shag Rocks. Antarctic Science, 20, 263270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, J.A., Pierce, S.D.Castelao, R.M. 2005. Time-dependent, wind-driven flow over a shallow midshelf submarine bank. Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1029/2004JC002761.Google Scholar
Brandon, M.A., Murphy, E.J., Whitehouse, M.J., Trathan, P.N., Murray, A.W.A., Bone, D.G.Priddle, J. 1999. The shelf break front to the east of the sub-Antarctic island of South Georgia. Continental Shelf Research, 19, 799819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catry, P., Phillips, R.A., Phalan, B., Silk, J.R.D.Croxall, J.P. 2004. Foraging strategies of grey-headed albatrosses Thalassarche chrysostoma: integration of movements, activity and feeding events. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 280, 261273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CCAMLR. 2009. Statistical Bulletin. Hobart, TAS: CCAMLR, 241 pp.Google Scholar
Cherel, Y.Klages, N.T.W. 1998. A review of the food of albatrosses. In Robertson, G. & Gales, R., eds. Albatross biology and conservation. Chipping Norton: Surrey Beatty & Sons, 113136.Google Scholar
Cherel, Y., Weimerskirch, H.Trouve, C. 2000. Food and feeding ecology of the neritic-slope forager black-browed albatross and its relationships with commercial fisheries in Kerguelen waters. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 207, 183199.Google Scholar
Cherel, Y., Weimerskirch, H.Trouve, C. 2002. Dietary evidence for spatial foraging segregation in sympatric albatrosses (Diomedea spp.) rearing chicks at Iles Nuageuses, Kerguelen. Marine Biology, 141, 11171129.Google Scholar
Clarke, A.Tyler, P.A. 2008. Adult Antarctic krill feeding at abyssal depths. Current Biology, 18, 282285.Google Scholar
Collins, M.A., Shreeve, R.S., Fielding, S.Thurston, M.H. 2008. Distribution, growth, diet and foraging behaviour of the yellow-fin notothen Patagonotothen guntheri (Norman) on the Shag Rocks shelf (Southern Ocean). Journal of Fish Biology, 72, 271286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croxall, J.P., Prince, P.A.Reid, K. 1997. Dietary segregation of krill-eating South Georgia seabirds. Journal of Zoology, 242, 531556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everson, I. 1983. Variations in vertical distribution and density of krill swarms in the vicinity of South Georgia. Memoirs of the National Institute of Polar Research, Special Issue, No. 27, 8492.Google Scholar
Fauchald, P., Erikstad, K.E.Skarsfjord, H. 2000. Scale-dependent predator-prey interactions: the hierarchical spatial distribution of seabirds and prey. Ecology, 81, 773783.Google Scholar
Frederiksen, M., Wright, P.J., Harris, M.P., Mavor, R.A., Heubeck, M.Wanless, S. 2005. Regional patterns of kittiwake Rissa tridactyla breeding success are related to variability in sandeel recruitment. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 300, 201211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fretwell, P.T., Tate, A.J., Deen, T.J.Belchier, M. 2009. Compilation of a new bathymetric dataset of South Georgia. Antarctic Science, 21, 171174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, G. 1992. Benthic-pelagic coupling - a benthic view. Oceanography and Marine Biology, 30, 149190.Google Scholar
Graham, A.G.C., Fretwell, P.T., Larter, R.D., Hodgson, D.A., Wilson, C.K., Tate, A.J.Morris, P. 2008. A new bathymetric compilation highlighting extensive paleo-ice sheet drainage on the continental shelf, South Georgia, sub-Antarctica. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 9, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granadeiro, J.P., Phillips, R.A., Brickle, P.Catry, P. 2011. Albatrosses following fishing vessels: how badly hooked are they on an easy meal? Plos One, 6, e17467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstreet, S.P.R., Spence, F.B., Shanks, A.M.McMillan, J.A. 1999. Fishing effects in northeast Atlantic shelf seas: patterns in fishing effort, diversity and community structure. II. Trends in fishing effort in the North Sea by UK registered vessels landing in Scotland. Fisheries Research, 40, 107124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutt, J. 2000. Some “driving forces” structuring communities of the sublittoral Antarctic macrobenthos. Antarctic Science, 12, 297313.Google Scholar
Gutt, J.Siegel, V. 1994. Benthopelagic aggregations of krill (Euphausia superba) on the deeper shelf of the Weddell Sea (Antarctic). Deep Sea Research I, 41, 169178.Google Scholar
Johnson, D.H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology, 61, 6571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kock, K.H. 2001. The direct influence of fishing and fishery-related activities on non-target species in the Southern Ocean with particular emphasis on longline fishing and its impact on albatrosses and petrels - a review. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 11, 3156.Google Scholar
Kock, K.H., Wilhelms, S., Everson, I.Groger, J. 1994. Variations in the diet composition and feeding intensity of mackerel icefish Champsocephalus gunnari at South Georgia (Antarctic). Marine Ecology Progress Series, 108, 4357.Google Scholar
Lueck, R.G.Mudge, T.D. 1997. Topographically induced mixing around a shallow seamount. Science, 276, 18311833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R.A., Silk, J.R.D., Croxall, J.P., Afanasyev, V.Bennett, V.J. 2005. Summer distribution and migration of nonbreeding albatrosses: individual consistencies and implications for conservation. Ecology, 86, 23862396.Google Scholar
Phillips, R.A., Silk, J.R.D., Phalan, B., Catry, P.Croxall, J.P. 2004. Seasonal sexual segregation in two Thalassarche albatross species: competitive exclusion, reproductive role specialization or foraging niche divergence? Proceedings of the Royal Society London, B271, 12831291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinaud, D.Weimerskirch, H. 2007. At-sea distribution and scale-dependent foraging behaviour of petrels and albatrosses: a comparative study. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76, 919.Google Scholar
Prince, P.A., Huin, N.Weimerskirch, H. 1994. Diving depths of albatrosses. Antarctic Science, 6, 353354.Google Scholar
Putz, K., Wilson, R.P., Charrassin, J.B., Raclot, T., Lage, J., Le Maho, Y., Kierspel, M.A.M., Culik, B.M.Adelung, D. 1998. Foraging strategy of king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) during summer at the Iles Crozet. Ecology, 79, 19051921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, K., Croxall, J.P.Prince, P.A. 1996. The fish diet of black-browed albatross Diomedea melanophris and grey-headed albatross D. chrysostoma at South Georgia. Polar Biology, 16, 469477.Google Scholar
Sedwick, P.N., DiTullio, G.R.Mackey, D.J. 2000. Iron and manganese in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: seasonal iron limitation in Antarctic shelf waters. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105, 11 32111 336.Google Scholar
Smith, C.R., Mincks, S.DeMaster, D.J. 2006. A synthesis of bentho-pelagic coupling on the Antarctic shelf: food banks, ecosystem inertia and global climate change. Deep Sea Research II, 53, 875894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, B.J., Reid, T.A.Bugoni, L. 2006. Seabird mortality on factory trawlers in the Falkland Islands and beyond. Biological Conservation, 131, 495504.Google Scholar
Syvitski, J.P.M. 1991. Towards an understanding of sediment deposition on glaciated continental shelves. Continental Shelf Research, 11, 897937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, B.J.Kostylev, V.E. 2011. Surficial geology and benthic habitat of the German Bank seabed, Scotian Shelf, Canada. Continental Shelf Research, 31, S54S68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakefield, E.D., Phillips, R.A.Matthiopoulos, J. 2009. Quantifying the habitat use and preference of pelagic seabirds using individual movement data: a review. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 391, 165182.Google Scholar
Wakefield, E.D., Phillips, R.A., Trathan, P., Arata, J., Gales, R., Huin, N., Robertson, G., Waugh, S., Weimerskirch, H.Matthiopoulos, J. 2011. Accessibility, habitat preference and conspecific competition limit the global distribution of breeding albatrosses. Ecological Monographs, 81, 141167.Google Scholar
Waugh, S.M., Weimerskirch, H., Cherel, Y.Prince, P.A. 2000. Contrasting strategies of provisioning and chick growth in two sympatrically breeding albatrosses at Campbell Island, New Zealand. Condor, 102, 804813.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.P., Putz, K., Gremillet, D., Culik, B.M., Kierspel, M., Regel, J., Bost, C.A., Lage, J.Cooper, J. 1995. Reliability of stomach temperature-changes in determining feeding characteristics of seabirds. Journal of Experimental Biology, 198, 11151135.Google Scholar