Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Larger foraging range but similar habitat selection in non-breeding versus breeding sub-Antarctic penguins

  • Jean-Baptiste Thiebot (a1), Amélie Lescroël (a1), David Pinaud (a1), Philip N. Trathan (a2) and Charles-André Bost (a1)...
Abstract
Abstract

For land-breeding marine organisms such as seabirds, knowledge about their habitat use has mainly been gained through studies of breeding individuals that are constrained to return frequently to their breeding grounds. In this study we set out to measure whether: a) habitat selection in the non-breeding period predicts habitat selection in the breeding period, and b) whether breeding individuals concentrated their activity on the closest suitable habitats. Macaroni Eudyptes chrysolophus and gentoo Pygoscelis papua penguins, two marine predators with contrasting foraging strategies, were tracked from the Iles Kerguelen and their habitat selection investigated through Mahalanobis distances factorial analysis. This study presents the first data about gentoo penguins’ juvenile dispersal. For both species, results showed 6.9 times larger maximum ranges and up to 12.2 times greater distances travelled during the non-breeding period. Habitat suitability maps suggested both species made similar environmental selections whatever the period. Macaroni penguins targeted pelagic areas beyond the shelf break while gentoo penguins always remained over the shelf. We consider the ecological significance of larger scale movements made outside the breeding period and suggest that this non-breeding period is of particular interest when attempting to understand an animal's habitat selection.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Larger foraging range but similar habitat selection in non-breeding versus breeding sub-Antarctic penguins
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Larger foraging range but similar habitat selection in non-breeding versus breeding sub-Antarctic penguins
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Larger foraging range but similar habitat selection in non-breeding versus breeding sub-Antarctic penguins
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
thiebot@cebc.cnrs.fr
References
Hide All
D.G. Ainley , C.A. Ribic , G. Ballard , S. Heath , I. Gaffney , B.J. Karl , K.J. Barton , P.R. Wilson S. Webb 2004. Geographic structure of Adélie penguin populations: overlap in colony-specific foraging areas. Ecological Monographs, 74, 159178.

V.L. Birt , T.P. Birt , D. Goulet , D.K. Cairns W.A. Montevecchi 1987. Ashmole's halo: direct evidence for prey depletion by a seabird. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 40, 205208.

C.A. Bost , J.B. Thiebot , D. Pinaud , Y. Cherel P.N. Trathan 2009. Where do penguins go during the interbreeding period? Using geolocation to track the winter dispersion of the macaroni penguin. Biology Letters, 5, 473476.

C. Calenge , G. Darmon , M. Basille , A. Loison J.-M. Julien 2008. The factorial decomposition of the Mahalanobis distances in habitat selection studies. Ecology, 89, 555566.

J.B. Charrassin , Y.H. Park , Y. Le Maho C.A. Bost 2002. Penguins as oceanographers unravel hidden mechanisms of marine productivity. Ecology Letters, 5, 317319.

K.A. Cresswell , J. Wiedenmann M. Mangel 2008. Can macaroni penguins keep up with climate- and fishing-induced changes in krill? Polar Biology, 31, 641649.

J.P. Croxall E.D. Prince 1980. Food, feeding ecology and ecological segregation of seabirds at South Georgia. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 14, 103131.

J.P. Croxall , J.R.D. Silk , R.A. Phillips , V. Afanasyev D.R. Briggs 2005. Global circumnavigations: tracking year-round ranges of non-breeding albatrosses. Science, 307, 249250.

B.E. Deagle , N.J. Gales M.A. Hindell 2008. Variability in foraging behaviour of chick-rearing macaroni penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus and its relation to diet. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 359, 295309.

J.M. Durant , D.Ø. Hjermann , T. Anker-Nilssen , G. Beaugrand , A. Mysterud , N. Pettorelli N.C. Stenseth 2005. Timing and abundance as key mechanisms affecting trophic interactions in variable environments. Ecology Letters, 8, 952958.

D. Grémillet , R.P. Wilson , S. Wanless T. Chater 2000. Blackbrowed albatrosses, international fisheries and the Patagonian Shelf. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 195, 269280.

A. Guisan N.E. Zimmermann 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 135, 147186.

A. Lescroël C.A. Bost 2005. Foraging under contrasting oceanographic conditions: the gentoo penguin at Kerguelen Archipelago. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 302, 245261.

A. Lescroël C.A. Bost 2006. Recent decrease in gentoo penguin populations at Iles Kerguelen. Antarctic Science, 18, 171174.

A. Lescroël , V. Ridoux C.A. Bost 2004. Spatial and temporal variation in the diet of the gentoo penguin (Pygoscelis papua) at Kerguelen Islands. Polar Biology, 27, 206216.

B.J. McConnell , M.A. Fedak , H.R. Burton , G.H. Englehard P. Reijnders 2002. Movements and foraging areas of naive, recently weaned southern elephant seal pups. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71, 6578.

Y. Mori I.L. Boyd 2004. Segregation of foraging between two sympatric penguin species: does rate maximisation make the difference? Marine Ecology Progress Series, 275, 241249.

R.A. Phillips , J.R.D. Silk , J.P. Croxall V. Afanasyev 2006. Year-round distribution of white-chinned petrels from South Georgia: relationships with oceanography and fisheries. Biological Conservation, 129, 336347.

R.A. Phillips , J.R.D. Silk , J.P. Croxall , V. Afanasyev V.J. Bennett 2005. Summer distribution and migration of non-breeding albatrosses: individual consistencies and implications for conservation. Ecology, 86, 23862396.

A.R. Rey , P.N. Trathan , K. Pütz A. Schiavini 2007. Effect of oceanographic conditions on the winter movements of rockhopper penguins Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome from Staten Island, Argentina. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 330, 285295.

S.A. Robinson M.A. Hindell 1996. Foraging ecology of gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua at Macquarie Island during the period of chick care. Ibis, 138, 722731.

J.L. Tanton , K. Reid , J.P. Croxall P.N. Trathan 2004. Winter distribution and behaviour of gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua at South Georgia. Polar Biology, 27, 299303.

P.N. Trathan , C. Green , J. Tanton , H. Peat , J. Poncet A. Morton 2006. Foraging dynamics of macaroni penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus at South Georgia during brood-guard. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 323, 239251.

A. Tsoar , O. Allouche , O. Steinitz , D. Rotem R. Kadmon 2007. A comparative evaluation of presence-only methods for modelling species distribution. Diversity and Distributions, 13, 397405.

H. Weimerskirch 2007. Are seabirds foraging for unpredictable resources? Deep-Sea Research II, 54, 211223.

H. Weimerskirch , R. Zotier P. Jouventin 1988. The avifauna of the Iles Kerguelen. Emu, 89, 1529.

H. Weimerskirch , D. Pinaud , F. Pawlowski C.A. Bost 2007. Does prey capture induce area-restricted search? A fine-scale study using GPS in a marine predator, the wandering albatross. American Naturalist, 170, 734743.

R.P. Wilson , B. Alvarrez , L. Latorre , D. Adelung , B. Culik R. Bannasch 1998. The movements of gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua from Ardley Island, Antarctica. Polar Biology, 19, 407413.

R.P. Wilson , D. Grémillet , J. Syder , M.A.M. Kierspel , S. Garthe , H. Weimerskirch , C. Schafer-Neth , J.A. Scolaro , C.A. Bost , J. Plötz D. Nel 2002. Remote-sensing systems and seabirds: their use, abuse and potential for measuring marine environmental variables. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 228, 241261.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Antarctic Science
  • ISSN: 0954-1020
  • EISSN: 1365-2079
  • URL: /core/journals/antarctic-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 62 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 127 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.