Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T18:45:09.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moult of three Tristan da Cunha seabird species sampled at sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2014

Leandro Bugoni*
Affiliation:
College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK Institute of Biological Sciences, Waterbirds and Sea Turtle Laboratory, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG. CP 474, CEP 96.203-900, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil
Liliana C. Naves
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Sciences, Waterbirds and Sea Turtle Laboratory, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG. CP 474, CEP 96.203-900, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil
Robert W. Furness
Affiliation:
College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK

Abstract

Primary, tail and body moult of three seabirds from Tristan da Cunha archipelago were studied by castnetting offshore south Brazil from February 2006 to August 2007. Timing, duration and synchronization of primary and tail moult are described relative to the annual calendar. Body moult overlapped breeding in Atlantic yellow-nosed albatrosses (Thalassarche chlororhynchos), but tail and primary moult did not. Spectacled petrels (Procellaria conspicillata) had protracted body moult, whereas primary and tail moult were completed by August. We documented onset of primary moult during chick-rearing in spectacled petrels and great shearwaters (Puffinus gravis) of unknown breeding status, and suggest that the south-west Atlantic Ocean holds important numbers of moulting birds of both species during the summer–early autumn. The albatrosses and the spectacled petrels replaced rectrices alternately. Great shearwaters replaced rectrices outward, starting at the central pair. Primary, tail and body moult largely overlap in all three species, suggesting that the metabolic costs of primary moult may not be overly restrictive. Metabolic and nutritional ability to afford simultaneous moult of different feather tracts support the idea that impaired flight caused by wing moult is a strong factor driving no overlap of primary moult and breeding.

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allard, K.A., Mallory, M.L., Wilcox, K.L. & Forbes, M.R. 2008. Prebasic molt initiation and progress in northern fulmars of the high Arctic: do molt and breeding overlap? Polar Biology, 31, 181188.Google Scholar
Alonso, H., Matias, R., Granadeiro, J.P. & Catry, P. 2009. Moult strategies of Cory’s shearwaters Calonectris diomedea borealis: the influence of colony location, sex and individual breeding status. Journal of Ornithology, 150, 329337.Google Scholar
Barbraud, C. & Chastel, O. 1998. Southern fulmars molt their primary feathers while incubating. Condor, 100, 563566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, J.R. 1969. Food, molt and age of 1st breeding in the Cape pigeon, Daption capensis . British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, No. 21, 3344.Google Scholar
Bourne, W.R.P. 1963. Observations of seabirds. Sea Swallow, 16, 940.Google Scholar
Bridge, E.S. 2006. Influences of morphology and behavior on wing-molt strategies in seabirds. Marine Ornithology, 34, 719.Google Scholar
Bridge, E.S. 2009. How does imping affect wing performance? Journal of Wildlife Rehabilitation, 29, 49.Google Scholar
Bridge, E.S. 2011. Mind the gaps: what is missing in our understanding of feather molt. Condor, 113, 14.Google Scholar
Brown, R.G.B. 1988. The wing-moult of fulmars and shearwaters (Procellariidae) in Canadian Atlantic waters. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 102, 203208.Google Scholar
Bugoni, L., Sander, M. & Costa, E.S. 2007. Effects of the first southern Atlantic hurricane on Atlantic petrels (Pterodroma incerta). Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 119, 725729.Google Scholar
Bugoni, L., Neves, T.S., Peppes, F.V. & Furness, R.W. 2008. An effective method for trapping scavenging seabirds at sea. Journal of Field Ornithology, 79, 308313.Google Scholar
Bugoni, L. & Furness, R.W. 2009. Ageing immature Atlantic yellow-nosed Thalassarche chlororhynchos and black-browed T. melanophris albatrosses in wintering grounds using bill colour and moult. Marine Ornithology, 37, 249252.Google Scholar
Catry, P., Poisbleau, M., Lecoq, M. & Phillips, R.A. 2013. Differences in the timing and extent of annual moult of black-browed albatrosses Thalassarche melanophris living in contrasting environments. Polar Biology, 36, 837842.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, R.J. 2005. Breeding biology, chick growth and provisioning of great shearwaters (Puffinus gravis) at Gough Island, south Atlantic Ocean. Emu, 105, 305310.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, R., Ryan, P.G., Cooper, J. & Hilton, G. 2003. Demography and population trends of the Atlantic yellow-nosed albatross. Condor, 105, 439452.Google Scholar
Edwards, A.E. 2008. Large-scale variation in flight feather molt as a mechanism enabling biennial breeding in albatrosses. Journal of Avian Biology, 39, 144151.Google Scholar
Edwards, A.E. & Rohwer, S. 2005. Large-scale patterns of molt activation in the flight feathers of two albatross species. Condor, 107, 835848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furness, R.W. 1988. Influence of status and recent breeding experience on the molt strategy of the yellow-nosed albatross Diomedea chlororhynchos . Journal of Zoology, 215, 719727.Google Scholar
Ginn, H.B. & Melville, D.S. 1983. Moult in birds. BTO guide No. 19. Tring: British Trust for Ornithology, 112 pp.Google Scholar
Gómez-Díaz, E. & González-Solís, J. 2007. Geographic assignment of seabirds to their origin: combining morphologic, genetic, and biogeochemical analyses. Ecological Applications, 17, 14841498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, M.P. 1973. The biology of the waved albatross Diomedea irrorata of Hood Island, Galapagos. Ibis, 115, 483510.Google Scholar
Hunter, S. 1984. Molt of the giant petrels Macronectes halli and M. giganteus at South Georgia. Ibis, 126, 119132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langston, N.E. & Rohwer, S. 1996. Molt-breeding tradeoffs in albatrosses: life history implications for big birds. Oikos, 76, 498510.Google Scholar
Leat, E.H.K., Bourgeon, S., Magnusdottir, E., Gabrielsen, G.W., Grecian, W.J., Hanssen, S.A., Olafsdottir, K., Petersen, A., Phillips, R.A., Strøm, H., Ellis, S., Fisk, A.T., Bustnes, J.O., Furness, R.W. & Borgå, K. 2013. Influence of wintering area on persistent organic pollutants in a breeding migratory seabird. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 491, 277293.Google Scholar
Lindström, Å., Visser, G.H. & Daan, S. 1993. The energetic cost of feather synthesis is proportional to basal metabolic rate. Physiological Zoology, 66, 490510.Google Scholar
Marchant, S. & Higgins, P.J., eds. 1990. Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds. Vol. 1. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1408 pp.Google Scholar
Marshall, A.J. & Serventy, D. L. 1956. The breeding cycle of the short-tailed shearwater, Puffinus tenuirostris (Temminck), in relation to trans-equatorial migration and its environment. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 127, 489509.Google Scholar
Neves, T., Vooren, C.M., Bugoni, L., Olmos, F. & Nascimento, L. 2006. Distribuição e abundância de aves marinhas no sudeste-sul do Brasil. In Neves, T., Bugoni, L. & Rossi-Wongtschowski, C.L.B., eds. Aves oceânicas e suas interações com a pesca na região Sudeste-Sul do Brasil. São Paulo: USP-REVIZEE, 1135.Google Scholar
Payne, R.B. 1972. Mechanisms and control of moult. In Farner, D.S. & King, J.R., eds. Avian biology, Vol. 2. New York, NY: Academic Press, 103l55.Google Scholar
Prince, P.A., Rodwell, S., Jones, M. & Rothery, P. 1993. Moult in black-browed and grey-headed albatrosses Diomedea melanophris and D. chrysostoma . Ibis, 135, 121131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohwer, S., Ricklefs, R.E., Rohwer, V.G. & Copple, M.M. 2009. Allometry of the duration of flight feather molt in birds. PLoS Biology, 7, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000132.Google Scholar
Rohwer, S., Viggiano, A. & Marzluff, J.M. 2011. Reciprocal tradeoffs between molt and breeding in albatrosses. Condor, 113, 6170.Google Scholar
Rowan, M.K. 1951. The yellow-nosed albatross Diomedea chlororhynchos Gmelin at its breeding grounds in the Tristan da Cunha group. Ostrich, 22, 139155.Google Scholar
Ryan, P.G. & Moloney, C.L. 2000. The status of spectacled petrels Procellaria conspicillata and other seabirds at Inaccessible Island. Marine Ornithology, 28, 93100.Google Scholar
Slagsvold, T. & Dale, S. 1996. Disappearance of female pied flycatchers in relation to breeding stage and experimentally induced molt. Ecology, 77, 462471.Google Scholar
Watson, G.E. 1970. A shearwater mortality on the Atlantic coast. Atlantic Naturalist, 25, 7580.Google Scholar
Watson, G.E. 1971. Molting great shearwaters (Puffinus gravis) off Tierra del Fuego. Auk, 88, 440442.Google Scholar
Weimerskirch, H. 1991. Sex-specific differences in molt strategy in relation to breeding in the wandering albatross. Condor, 93, 731737.Google Scholar
Woods, R.W. & Woods, A. 1997. Atlas of breeding birds of the Falkland Islands. Oswestry: Anthony Nelson, 193 pp.Google Scholar