No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Point-joint coordinate formulation for the dynamic analysis of generalised planar linkages
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2009
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
This paper presents a two-step formulation for the dynamic analysis of generalised planar linkages. First, a rigid body is replaced by a dynamically equivalent constrained system of particles and Newton's second law is used to study the motion of the particles without introducing any rotational coordinates. The translational motion of the constrained particles represents the general motion of the rigid body both translationally and rotationally. The simplicity and the absence of any rotational coordinates from the final form of the equations of motion are considered the main advantages of this formulation. A velocity transformation is then used to transform the equations of motion to a reduced set in terms of selected relative joint variables. For an open-chain, this process automatically eliminates all of the non-working constraint forces and leads to efficient integration of the equations of motion. For a closed-chain, suitable joints should be cut and some cut-joint constraint equations should be included. An example of a closed-chain is used to demonstrate the generality and efficiency of the proposed method.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2005
References
[1]Gear, C. W., “Differential-algebraic equations index transformations”, SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 9 (1988) 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Keat, J. E. and Turner, J. D., “Equations of motion of multibody systems for applications to large space structure development”, in AIAA Dynamics Specialist Conference,Palm Springs,CA, AIAA Paper 84–1014-CP, (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Kim, S. S. and Vanderploeg, M. J., “A general and efficient method for dynamic analysis of mechanical systems using velocity transformation”, ASME J. Mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation in Design 108 (1986) 176–182.Google Scholar
[4]Nikravesh, P. E., Computer aided analysis of mechanical systems (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988).Google Scholar
[5]Nikravesh, P. E. and Gim, G., “Systematic construction of the equations of motion for multibody systems containing a closed kinematic loop”, in Proceedings of the ASME Design Conference, (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Orlandea, N., Chace, M. A. and Calahan, D. A., “A sparsity-oriented approach to dynamic analysis and design of mechanical systems, Part I and II”, ASME J. Engineering for Industry 99 (1977) 773–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Paul, B. and Krajcinovic, D., “Computer analysis of machines with planar motion. I. Kinematics, 2. Dynamics”, ASME J. Appl. Mech. 37 (1970) 697–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Schiehlen, W. O., “Multibody system dynamics: Roots and perspectives”, J. Multibody System Dynamics 1 (1997) 149–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Shabana, A. A., “Flexible multibody dynamics: Review of past and recent developments”, J. Multibody System Dynamics 1 (1997) 189–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Wittenburg, J., “Nonlinear equations of motion for arbitrary systems of interconnected rigid bodies”, in Proceedings of the Symposium on Dynamics of Multibody Systems,Munich,Germany,Aug 28-Sep 3, (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access