Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-m744c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-15T23:07:52.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bilingual language experience as a multidimensional spectrum: Associations with objective and subjective language proficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2020

Jason W. Gullifer Open the ORCID record for Jason W. Gullifer [Opens in a new window] ,
Shanna Kousaie ,
Annie C. Gilbert ,
Angela Grant ,
Nathalie Giroud ,
Kristina Coulter ,
Denise Klein ,
Shari Baum ,
Natalie Phillips  and
Debra Titone
Jason W. Gullifer
Affiliation:
McGill University and Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music
Shanna Kousaie
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa and Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music
Annie C. Gilbert
Affiliation:
McGill University and Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music
Angela Grant
Affiliation:
Missouri Western State University and Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music
Nathalie Giroud
Affiliation:
University of Zurich and Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music
Kristina Coulter
Affiliation:
Concordia University and Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music
Denise Klein
Affiliation:
McGill University and Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music
Shari Baum
Affiliation:
McGill University and Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music
Natalie Phillips
Affiliation:
Concordia University and Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music
Debra Titone*
Affiliation:
McGill University and Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: debra.titone@mcgill.ca.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the multifactorial space of language experience in which people continuously vary, bilinguals are often dichotomized into ostensibly homogeneous groups. The timing of language exposure (age of acquisition) to a second language (L2) is one well-studied construct that is known to impact language processing, cognitive processing, and brain organization, but recent work shows that current language exposure is also a crucial determinant in these domains. Critically, many indices of bilingual experience are inherently subjective and based on self-report questionnaires. Such measures have been criticized in favor of objective measures of language ability (e.g., naming ability or verbal fluency). Here, we estimate the bilingual experience jointly as a function of multiple continuous aspects of experience, including the timing of language exposure, the amount of L2 exposure across communicative contexts, and language entropy (a flexible measure of language balance) across communicative contexts. The results suggest that current language exposure exhibits distinct but interrelated patterns depending on the socio-experiential context of language usage. They also suggest that, counterintuitively, our sample more accurately self-assesses L2 proficiency than native language proficiency. A precise quantification of the multidimensional nature of bilingualism will enhance the ability of future research to assess language processing, acquisition, and control.

Keywords

bilingualismlanguage entropylanguage proficiency

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 42 , Special Issue 2: Special Issue: Individual Differences in Bilingualism , March 2021 , pp. 245 - 278
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Abutalebi, J., & Green, D. W. (2016). Neuroimaging of language control in bilinguals: Neural adaptation and reserve. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 689–698. doi: 10.1017/s1366728916000225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, R. M., Valdes Kroff, J. R., & Novick, J. M. (2020). Does integrating a code-switch during comprehension engage cognitive control? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46, 741–759. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000755 Google ScholarPubMed
Anderson, J. A. E., Hawrylewicz, K., & Bialystok, E. (2018). Who is bilingual? Snapshots across the lifespan. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1017/s1366728918000950 Google Scholar
Anderson, J. A. E., Mak, L., Keyvani Chahi, A., & Bialystok, E. (2018). The language and social background questionnaire: Assessing degree of bilingualism in a diverse population. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 250–263. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0867-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, S., & Titone, D. (2014). Moving toward a neuroplasticity view of bilingualism, executive control, and aging. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 857–894. doi: 10.1017/S0142716414000174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty-Martinez, A. L., & Dussias, P. E. (2017). Bilingual experience shapes language processing: Evidence from codeswitching. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 173–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty-Martinez, A. L., Navarro-Torres, C. A., Dussias, P. E., Bajo, M. T., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Kroll, J. F. (2020). Interactional context mediates the consequences of bilingualism for language and cognition. Journal of Expimental Psychology: Learning, Memeroy, and Cognition, 46, 1022–1027 doi: 10.1037/xlm0000770 Google ScholarPubMed
Berken, J. A., Chai, X., Chen, J.-K., Gracco, V. L., & Klein, D. (2016). Effects of early and late bilingualism on resting-state functional connectivity. Journal of Neuroscience, 36, 1165–1172. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1960-15.2016 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berken, J. A., Gracco, V. L., Chen, J.-K., & Klein, D. (2015). The timing of language learning shapes brain structure associated with articulation. Brain Structure and Function, 221, 3591–3600. doi: 10.1007/s00429-015-1121-9 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bice, K., & Kroll, J. F. (2019). English only? Monolinguals in linguistically diverse contexts have an edge in language learning. Brain and Language, 196, 104644. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104644 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanche, P., & Merino, B. J. (1989). Self-assessment of foreign—Language skills: Implications for teachers and researchers. Language Learning, 39, 313–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Sociological methods & research. Sociological Methods Research, 33, 261–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commins, N. L. (1989). Language and affect: Bilingual students at home and at school. Language Arts, 66, 29–43.Google Scholar
Dash, T., Berroir, P., Joanette, Y., & Ansaldo, A. I. (2019). Alerting, orienting, and executive control: The effect of bilingualism and age on the subcomponents of attention. Frontiers in Neurology, 10. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01122 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeLuca, V., Rothman, J., Bialystok, E., & Pliatsikas, C. (2019). Redefining bilingualism as a spectrum of experiences that differentially affects brain structure and function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116, 7565–7574. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811513116 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeLuca, V., Rothman, J., Bialystok, E., & Pliatsikas, C. (2020). Duration and extent of bilingual experience modulate neurocognitive outcomes. NeuroImage, 204. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116222 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dussias, P. E., & Sagarra, N. (2007). The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eleta, I., & Golbeck, J. (2014). Multilingual use of Twitter: Social networks at the language frontier. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 424–432. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & Mackay, I. R. A. (1995). Effects of age of 2nd-language learning on the production of english consonants. Speech Communication, 16, 1–26. doi: 10.1016/0167-6393(94)00044-B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, O., & Wei, L. (2012). Translanguaging. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–7). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Green, D. W., & Abutalebi, J. (2013). Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal Cognitive Psychology, 25, 515–530. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2013.796377 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, D. W., & Wei, L. (2014). A control process model of code-switching. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 29, 499–511. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.882515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1985). The bilingual as a competent but specific speaker-hearer. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 6, 467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1997). The bilingual individual. Interpreting, 2, 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2016). The complementarity principle and its impact on processing, acquisition, and dominance. Language dominance in bilinguals: Issues of measurement and operationalization (pp. 66–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullifer, J. W., Chai, X. J., Whitford, V., Pivneva, I., Baum, S., Klein, D., & Titone, D. (2018). Bilingual experience and resting-state brain connectivity: Impacts of L2 age of acquisition and social diversity of language use on control networks. Neuropsychologia, 117, 123–134. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.037 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gullifer, J. W., & Titone, D. (2018). Compute language entropy with {languageEntropy}. Retrieved from https://github.com/jasongullifer/languageEntropy Google Scholar
Gullifer, J. W., & Titone, D. (2020a). Characterizing the social diversity of bilingualism using language entropy. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23, 283–294. doi: 10.1017/s1366728919000026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullifer, J. W., & Titone, D. (2020b). Engaging proactive control: Influences of diverse language experiences using insights from machine learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi: 10.1037/xge0000933 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jia, G., Aaronson, D., & Wu, Y. (2002). Long-term language attainment of bilingual immigrants: Predictive variables and language group differences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 599–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kałamała, P., Szewczyk, J., Chuderski, A., Senderecka, M., & Wodniecka, Z. (2020). Patterns of bilingual language use and response inhibition: A test of the adaptive control hypothesis. Cognition, 204, 104373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, D., Mok, K., Chen, J.-K., & Watkins, K. E. (2014). Age of language learning shapes brain structure: A cortical thickness study of bilingual and monolingual individuals. Brain and Language, 131, 20–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kousaie, S., Chai, X. J., Sander, K. M., & Klein, D. (2017). Simultaneous learning of two languages from birth positively impacts intrinsic functional connectivity and cognitive control. Brain and Cognition, 117, 49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.06.003 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kousaie, S., & Phillips, N. A. (2011). Age-related differences in interlingual priming: A behavioural and electrophysiological investigation. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 18, 22–55. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2010.510555 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krein, J. L., MacLean, A. C., Delorey, D. P., Knutson, C. D., & Eggett, D. L. (2009, June). Language entropy: A metric for characterization of author programming language distribution. In 4th Workshop on Public Data about Software Development.Google Scholar
Li, P., Legault, J., & Litcofsky, K. (2014). Neuroplasticity as a function of second language learning: Anatomical changes in the human brain. Cortex, 58, 301–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, P., Zhang, F., Tsai, E., & Puls, B. (2014). Language history questionnaire (LHQ 2.0): A new dynamic web-based research tool. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 673–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P., Zhang, F., Yu, A., & Zhao, X. (2019). Language history questionnaire (lhq3): An enhanced tool for assessing multilingual experience. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. Andvance online publication.Google Scholar
Luk, G., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 605–621. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2013.795574 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research, 50, 940–967. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067) CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Revelle, W. R. (2017). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych Google Scholar
Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with s. London: Springer.Google Scholar
Schrauf, R. W. (2002). Comparing cultures within-subjects: A cognitive account of acculturation as a framework for cross-cultural study. Anthropological Theory, 2, 98–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrauf, R. W. (2009). English use among older bilingual immigrants in linguistically concentrated neighborhoods: Social proficiency and internal speech as intracultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 24, 157–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shannon, C. E. (1948). The mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulpizio, S., Del Maschio, N., Del Mauro, G., Fedeli, D., & Abutalebi, J. (2019). Bilingualism as a gradient measure modulates functional connectivity of language and control networks. NeuroImage, 205, 116306. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116306 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surrain, S., & Luk, G. (2019). Describing bilinguals: A systematic review of labels and descriptions used in the literature between 2005–2015. Bilingualism—Language and Cognition, 22, 401–415. doi: 10.1017/S1366728917000682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiv, M., Gullifer, J., Feng, R., & Titone, D. (2020). Using network science to map what Montréal bilinguals talk about across languages and communicative contexts. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 56, 100913. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/bmry2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tiv, M., O’Regan, E., & Titone, D. (2020). Bilingual social cognition: Investigating the relationship between bilingual language experience and mentalizing. Retrieved fron doi: 10.31234/osf.io/nbsxh CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomoschuk, B., Ferreira, V. S., & Gollan, T. H. (2019). When a seven is not a seven: Self-ratings of bilingual language proficiency differ between and within language populations. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22, 516–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaid, J., & Menon, R. (2000). Correlates of bilinguals’ preferred language for mental computations. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 4, 325–342.Google Scholar
van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2010). Mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45, 1–68.Google Scholar
Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2012). Second-language experience modulates first- and second-language word frequency effects: Evidence from eye movement measures of natural paragraph reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 73–80. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0179-5 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zell, E., & Krizan, Z. (2014). Do people have insight into their abilities? A metasynthesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed