Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zklqj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T03:29:14.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do nonword repetition errors in children with specific language impairment reflect a weakness in an unidentified skill specific to nonword repetition or a deficit in simultaneous processing?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2006

Klara Marton
Klara Marton
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, CUNY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This Commentary supports Gathercole's (2006) proposal on a double deficit in children with specific language impairment (SLI). The author suggests that these children have a limited phonological storage combined with a particular problem of processing novel speech stimuli. According to Gathercole, there are three areas of skill contributing to memory for nonwords: general cognitive abilities, phonological storage, and an unidentified skill specific to nonword repetition. The focus of this Commentary is to examine whether these children's nonword repetition performance is influenced by an unidentified skill or some other processes. An alternative hypothesis is that the nonword repetition errors observed in children with SLI are related to one of their main weaknesses, to their difficulties in simultaneous processing of information. Evidence for this argument comes from our recent studies: from error analyses data and from findings on nonword repetition with stimuli that included meaningful parts (monosyllabic real words).

Information

Type
Commentaries
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , October 2006 , pp. 569 - 573
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Biran M., & Friedmann N. 2005. From phonological paraphasias to the structure of the phonological output lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 589– 616.Google Scholar
Dollaghan C. A., Biber M. E., & Campbell T. F. 1995. Lexical influences on nonword repetition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 211– 222.Google Scholar
Gathercole S. E. 2006. Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship [Keynote]. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 513– 543.Google Scholar
Gathercole S. E., Willis C. S., & Baddeley A. 1991. The influences of number of syllables and word-likeness on children's repetition of nonwords. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 349– 367.Google Scholar
Levelt W. J. M. 1992. Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 1– 22.Google Scholar
Levelt W. J. M., Roelofs A., & Meyer A. S. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1– 75.Google Scholar
Marton K., & Schwartz R. G. 2003. Working memory capacity and language processes in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1138– 1153.Google Scholar
Marton K., Schwartz R. G., Farkas L., & Katsnelson V. (in press). The effect of sentence length and complexity on working memory performance in Hungarian children with specific language impairment (SLI): A cross-linguistic comparison. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders.
Marton K., Schwartz R. G., Phinkasova M., Roth R., & Kelmenson L. 2006. Can children with specific language impairment support their working memory performance with their long-term knowledge? Unpublished manuscript.
Meyer A. S. 1992. Investigation of phonological encoding through speech error analyses: Achievements, limitations, and alternatives. Cognition, 42, 181– 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery J. W. 1995. Examination of phonological working memory in specifically language impaired children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 335– 378.Google Scholar