Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-mm7gn Total loading time: 0.357 Render date: 2022-08-15T12:48:50.218Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Learning nonnative names: The effect of poor native phonological awareness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2005

CHIEH-FANG HU
Affiliation:
Taipei Municipal Teachers College
C. MELANIE SCHUELE
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University

Abstract

This research investigates the influence of phonological awareness on the learning of vocabulary in a foreign language. Thirty-seven Chinese-speaking third graders with high phonological awareness and 37 with low phonological awareness participated in multitrial word learning tasks involving nonnative sounding (English) new names paired with novel referents. The children also participated in three additional associative learning tasks: learning to associate novel native sounding names, familiar native names, and unfamiliar visual shapes with unfamiliar referents. Results indicated that children with lower phonological awareness learned both the novel nonnative names and the novel native names less accurately than children with higher phonological awareness and required more learning trials. However, these two groups did not differ in learning to associate familiar names or unfamiliar visual shapes with novel referents. The findings suggest that poor phonological awareness might slow nonnative acquisition of vocabulary via difficulty in constructing new phonological representations for new words.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams M. 1990. Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Adlard A., & Hazan V. 1998. Speech perception in children with specific reading difficulties (dyslexia). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 1, 153177.Google Scholar
Avons S. E., Wragg C. A., Cupples L., & Lovegrove W. J. 1998. Measures of phonological short-term memory and their relationship to vocabulary development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 583601.Google Scholar
Brady S., Poggie E., & Rapala M. M. 1989. Speech repetition abilities in children who differ in reading skill. Language and Speech, 32, 109122.Google Scholar
Brady S. A. 1991. The role of working memory in reading disability. In S. A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 129151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bruck M. 1992. Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874887.Google Scholar
Caravolas M., & Bruck M. 1993. The effect of oral and written language input on children's phonological awareness: a cross-linguistic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 130.Google Scholar
Castles A., & Coltheart M. 2004. Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91, 77111.Google Scholar
Catts H. W. 1986. Speech production/phonological deficits in reading disordered children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 504508.Google Scholar
Catts H. W. 1989. Phonological processing deficits and reading disabilities. In A. G. Kamhi & H. W. Catts (Eds.), Reading disabilities: A developmental language perspective (pp. 101132). Boston, MA: College Hill.
Chen T.-Y. 1999. A case study of a Chinese student with English learning disabilities. In T.-L. Huang, J. Katchen, W.-Y. Dai, & Y.-N. Leung (Eds.), The Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 271282). Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.
Cheung H. 1996. Pseudoword span as a unique predictor of second-language vocabulary learning. Developmental Psychology, 32, 867873.Google Scholar
Cheung H., & Chen H.-C. 2004. Early orthographic experience modifies both phonological awareness and on-line speech processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 128.Google Scholar
Cheung H., Chen H.-C., Lai C. Y., Wong. O. C., & Hills M. 2001. The development of phonological awareness effects of spoken language experience and orthography. Cognition, 81, 227241.Google Scholar
Cisero C. A., & Royer J. M. 1995. The development of cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 275303.Google Scholar
Comeau L., Cormier P., Grandmaison E., & Lacroix D. 1999. A longitudinal study of phonological processing skills in children learning to read in a second language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 2943.Google Scholar
de Jong P. F., Seveke M.-J., & van Veen M. 2000. Phonological sensitivity and the acquisition of new words in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 275301.Google Scholar
de Weirdt W. 1988. Speech perception and frequency discrimination for good and poor readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 163183.Google Scholar
Durgunoglu A. Y., Nagy W. E., & Hancin–Bhatt B. J. 1993. Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 453465.Google Scholar
Foy J. G., & Mann V. 2003. Home literacy environment and phonological awareness in preschool children: Differential effects for rhyme and phoneme awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 5988.Google Scholar
Ganschow L., Sparks R. L., & Javorsky J. 1998. Foreign language learning difficulties: An historical perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 248258.Google Scholar
Ganschow L., Sparks R. L., Javorsky J., Pohlman J., & Bisho-Marbury A. 1991. Identifying native language difficulties among foreign language learners in college: A “foreign” language learning disability? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 530541.Google Scholar
Gathercole S. E., & Baddeley A. D. 1990. The role of phonological memory in vocabulary acquisition: A study of young children learning new names. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 439454.Google Scholar
Gathercole S. E., Service E., Hitch G. J., Adams A.-M., & Martin A. J. 1999. Phonological short-term memory and vocabulary development: Further evidence on the nature of the relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 6577.Google Scholar
Goswami U. 2000. Rhyme and analogy in beginning reading: Conceptual and methodological issues. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 6393.Google Scholar
Goswami U. 2002. Phonology, reading development and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 141163.Google Scholar
Goswami U., & Bryant P. E. 1990. Phonological skills and learning to read. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Guron L. M., & Lundberg I. 2003. Identifying dyslexia in multilingual studies: Can phonological awareness be assessed in the majority language? Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 6982.Google Scholar
Ho C. S. H., & Bryant P. 1997. Phonological skills are important in learning to read Chinese. Developmental Psychology, 33, 946915.Google Scholar
Ho C. S.-H., Law T. P.-S., & Ng P. M. 2000. The phonological deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 5779.Google Scholar
Hu C. F. 1999. Predicting foreign language word learning from first language phonological abilities. In T.-L. Huang, J. Katchen, W.-Y. Dai, & Y.-N. Leung (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 123134). Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.
Hu C. F. 2003. Phonological memory, phonological awareness, and foreign language word learning. Language Learning, 53, 429462.Google Scholar
Hu C. F. 2004. The development of phonological representations among Chinese-speaking children. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 2, 103130.Google Scholar
Hu C. F., & Catts H. W. 1998. The role of phonological processing in early reading ability: What we can learn from Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 5579.Google Scholar
Lee P.-F. 2000. Chinese bilingual children's word definition skill. Unpublished master's thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei.
Lu L., & Liu H. H. 1998. Chinese adaptation of Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Revised. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological Publishing.
Manis F. R., McBride–Chang C., Seidenberg M., Keating P., Doi L. M., Munson B., & Petersen A. 1997. Are speech perception deficits associated with developmental dyslexia? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 211235.Google Scholar
Manis F. R., Seidenberg M. S., & Doi L. M. 1999. See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 129157.Google Scholar
Meschyan G., & Hernandez A. 2002. Is native-language decoding skill related to second-language learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 1422.Google Scholar
Metsala J. L. 1999. Young children's phonological awareness and nonword repetition as a function of vocabulary development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 319.Google Scholar
Morais J., Cary L., Alegria J., & Bertelson P. 1979. Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phonemes arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7, 323331.Google Scholar
Morais J., Castro S. L., Scliar–Cabral L., Kolinsky R., & Content A. 1987. The effects of literacy on the recognition of dichotic words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 451465.Google Scholar
Pennington B. F., Van Orden G. C., Smith S. D., Green P. A., & Haith M. M. 1990. Phonological processing skills and deficits in adult dyslexics. Child Development, 61, 17531778.Google Scholar
Prakash P., Rekha D., Nigam R., & Karanth P. 1993. Phonological awareness, orthography, and literacy. In R. Scholes (Ed.), Literacy and language analysis (pp. 5570). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Read C. A., Zhang Y., Nie H., & Ding B. 1986. The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic reading. Cognition, 24, 3144.Google Scholar
Reed M. A. 1989. Speech perception and the discrimination of brief auditory cues in reading disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 270292.Google Scholar
Service E., & Kohonen V. 1995. Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 155172.Google Scholar
Simon C. 2000. Dyslexia and learning a foreign language: A personal experience. Annals of Dyslexia, 50, 155187.Google Scholar
Siok W. T., & Fletcher P. 2001. The role of phonological awareness and visual–orthographic skills in Chinese reading acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 37, 886899.Google Scholar
Snowling M., Chiat S., & Hulme C. 1991. Words, nonwords, and phonological processes: Some comments on Gathercole, Willis, Emslie, and Baddeley. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 369373.Google Scholar
Snowling M. J., van Wagtendonk B., & Stafford C. 1988. Object-naming deficits in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 11, 6785.Google Scholar
Sparks R., & Ganschow L. 1993. Searching for the cognitive locus of foreign language learning difficulties: Linking first and second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 289302.Google Scholar
Sparks R., & Ganschow L. 1995. A strong inference approach to causal factors in foreign language learning: A response to MacIntyre. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 235248.Google Scholar
Sparks R., Ganschow L., & Pohlman J. 1989. Linguistic coding deficits in foreign language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 179195.Google Scholar
Stahl S., & Murray B. 1994. Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 221234.Google Scholar
Stanovich K. E., & Siegel L. S. 1994. The phenotypic performance profile of reading-disabled children: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 2453.Google Scholar
Swan D., & Goswami U. 1997. Picture naming deficits in developmental dyslexia: The phonological representation hypothesis. Brain and Language, 56, 334353.Google Scholar
Torgesen J., Wagner R., & Rashotte C. 1994. Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276286.Google Scholar
Wagner R., Torgesen J., Laughton P., Simmons K., & Rashotte C. 1993. Development of young readers' phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 83103.Google Scholar
Wagner R., Torgesen J., & Rashotte C. 1994. Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 7387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf M., & Bowers P. G. 1999. The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415438.Google Scholar
22
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Learning nonnative names: The effect of poor native phonological awareness
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Learning nonnative names: The effect of poor native phonological awareness
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Learning nonnative names: The effect of poor native phonological awareness
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *