Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-ct24h Total loading time: 0.25 Render date: 2022-05-20T23:40:58.745Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

The metalinguistic benefits of limited contact with a second language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Gregory W. Yelland*
Affiliation:
Monash University
Jacinta Pollard
Affiliation:
Monash University
Anthony Mercuri
Affiliation:
Monash University
*
Gregory W. Yelland, Department of Psychology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia, e-mail: yelland@ccsl.cc.monash.edu.au

Abstract

This study examined whether the often-reported metalinguistic benefits of childhood bilingualism extend to children whose experience with a second language is considerably more limited, and if so, whether this metalinguistic advantage flows on to reading acquisition. Its purpose was to provide direct evidence of a causal role for metalinguistic awareness in reading acquisition. The study focused on the developing word awareness skills of two groups of preparatory and grade 1 children: one group was strictly monolingual in English; the other, the “marginal bilingual” group, consisted of English monolingual who were participating in a second language program that provided I hour of Italian instruction each week.After only 6 months of instruction in Italian, the marginal bilingual children showed a significantly higher level word awareness than their monolingual counterparts. This advantage weakened across grade 1, as both groups approached ceiling levels of performance. Nonetheless, the initial advantage flows through to the first major step in reading acquisition, with the grade 1 marginal bilinguals showing significantly greater word recognition skill than the monolinguals, thus strengthening the argument for a causal role in reading acquisition for word awareness.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, K. K. (1982). The development of young children's metalinguistic understanding of the term word. Journal of Educational Research, 76, 8993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, E. W. & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 4966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Ben, Zeev S. (1977). The influence of bilingualism on cognitive strategy and cognitive development. Child Development, 48, 10091018.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1986). Children's concept of word. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1987). Words as things: Development of word concept by bilingual children. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 133140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1988). Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. Developmental Psychology, 24, 560567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read - A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, D. J. (1964). An analysis of word sounds by young children. British Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34, 158170.Google Scholar
Bryant, P. E., MacLean, M., Bradley, L. L. & Crossland, J. (1990). Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read. Developmental Psychology, 26, 429438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B., Freebody, P. & Gates, A. (1992). Longitudinal data on the relations of word-reading strategies to comprehension, reading time, and phonemic awareness. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 141151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, C. (1970). Reading, writing and phonology. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 287309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1970). Phonology and reading. In Levin, H. & Williams, J. P. (Eds.), Basic studies in reading (pp. 319). New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Patterson, K. & Marshall, J. C. (1980). Deep dyslexia. London: Rutledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1978). Bilingualism and the development of metalinguistic awareness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 9, 131149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davine, M., Tucker, G. R. & Lambert, W. E. (1971). The perception of phoneme sequences by monolingual and bilingual elementary school children. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 3, 7276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, R. M. (1985). Bilingual cognitive development: Addressing three gaps in current research. Child Development, 56, 13761388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, A. W. (1984). Reading, writing and dyslexia: A cognitive analysis. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Feldman, C. & Shen, M. (1971). Some language related cognitive advantages of bilingual five year olds. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 118, 235244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, B. & Routh, D. K. (1975). Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables, and phonemes: A developmental study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 331342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galambos, S. J. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1990). The effects of learning two languages on metalinguistic awareness. Cognition, 34, 156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galambos, S. J. & Hakuta, K. (1988). Subject specific and task-specific characteristics of metalinguistic awareness in bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 141162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, S. & Ebeling, K. S. (1989). Children's use of nonegocentric standards in judgments of functional size. Child Development, 60, 920932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gough, P. B. & Hillinger, M. L. (1980). Learning to read: An unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30, 179196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K. & Diaz, R. M. (1985). The relationship between degree of bilingualism and cognitive ability: A critical discussion and some longitudinal data. In Nelson, K. E. (Ed.), Children's language (Vol. 5, pp. 319344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Harris, M. & Coltheart, M. (1986). Language processing in children and adults: An introduction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Heilman, A. W., Blair, T. R. & Rupley, W. H. (1981). Principles and practices of teaching reading. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
Helfgott, J. A. (1976). Phonemic segmentation and blending skills of kindergarten children. Implications for beginning reading acquisition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1, 157169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ianco-Worrall, A. (1972). Bilingualism and cognitive development. Child Development, 43, 13901400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirtley, C., Bryant, P., MacLean, M. & Bradley, L. (1989). Rhyme, rime, and the onset of reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 224245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolinsky, R., Cary, L. & Morais, J. (1987). Awareness of words as phonological entities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 223232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewkowicz, N. K. (1980). Phonemic awareness training: What to teach and how to teach it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 686700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, I. Y. (1973). Segmentation of the spoken word. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 23, 6577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, I. Y. & Shankweiler, D. (1985). Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W. & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, A. L. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In Liberman, I. Y. & Shankweiler, D. (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 133). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lie, A. (1991). Effects of a training program for stimulating skills in word analysis in firstgrade children. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 234249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, I., Frost, J. & Petersen, O-P. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, I., Olofsson, A. & Wall, S. (1980). Reading and spelling skills in the first school years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 159173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majeres, R. L. & Fox, R. (1984). Children's spontaneous use of real-world information in problem solving. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 144, 8997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, V. A. (1986). Phonological awareness, the role of reading experience. Cognition, 24, 6592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, V. A. & Liberman, I. Y. (1984). Phonological awareness and verbal short-term memory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 592598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesdale, A. R., Herriman, M. L. & Tunmer, W. E. (1984). Phonological awareness in children. In Tunmer, W. E., Pratt, C. & Herriman, M. L. (Eds.), Metalinguistic awareness in children: Theory, research and implications (pp. 5672). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olofsson, A. & Lundberg, I. (1985). Evaluation of long term effects of phonemic awareness training in kindergarten: Illustrations of some methodological problems in evaluating research. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 26, 2134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1929). The child's conception of the world. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pisoni, D. B. & Luce, P. A. (1987). Acoustic-phonetic representation in word recognition. In Frauenfelder, U. H. & Tyler, L. K. (Eds.), Spoken word recognition (pp. 2152). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ravn, K. E. & Gelman, S. A. (1984). Rule usage in children's understanding of “big” and “little”. Child Development, 55, 21412150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, I. S. & Bryant, P. (1990). Social background, phonological awareness and children's reading. British Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8, 209225.Google Scholar
Rubin, H. & Turner, A. (1989). Linguistic awareness skills in grade one children in a French immersion setting. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, I, 7386.Google Scholar
Santa, J. L., Miller, J. J. & Shaw, M. L. (1979). Using Quasi Flo prevent alpha inflation due to stimulus variation. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 3746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sera, M. D., Troyer, D. & Smith, L. B. (1988). What do two-year-olds know about the sizes of things? Child Development, 59, 14891496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankweiler, D. (1989). How problems in comprehension are related to difficulties in decoding. In Liberman, I. Y. & Shankweiler, D. (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 3568). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R. & Matthews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 13091324.Google Scholar
Templeton, S. & Spivey, E. (1980). The concept of word in young children as a function of level of cognitive development. Research in Teaching of English, 14, 265278.Google Scholar
Treiman, R. & Baron, J. (1983). Phonemic-analysis training helps children benefit from spelling-sound rules. Memory & Cognition, 11, 382389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tunmer, W. E. (1989). The role of language related factors in reading disability. In Liberman, I. Y. & Shankweiler, D. (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 91131). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Tunmer, W. E. & Bowey, J. A. (1984). Metalinguistic awareness and reading acquisition. In Tunmer, W. E., Pratt, C. & Herriman, M. L. (Eds.), Metalinguistic awareness in children: Theory, research and implications (pp. 144168). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, L. & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1981). Quick on the uptake. New Scientist, 89, 608609.Google Scholar
Van Kleeck, A. & C. M, Schuele. (1987). Precursors to literacy: Normal development. Topics in Language Disorders, 7, 1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vellutino, F. R. & Scanlon, D. M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321363.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1962)Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K. & J. K., Torgesen (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallach, M. & Wallach, L. (1976). Teaching all children to read. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
100
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The metalinguistic benefits of limited contact with a second language
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The metalinguistic benefits of limited contact with a second language
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The metalinguistic benefits of limited contact with a second language
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *