Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-79b67bcb76-kmcbj Total loading time: 0.23 Render date: 2021-05-14T15:04:18.721Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Size matters: Early vocabulary as a predictor of language and literacy competence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2010

JOANNE LEE
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

This paper investigated the predictive ability of expressive vocabulary size and lexical composition at age 2 on later language and literacy skills from ages 3 through 11. Multivariate analysis of covariance was performed to compare 16 language and literacy outcomes between children with large expressive vocabulary size at 24 months (N = 1,073) and those with smaller expressive vocabulary size. Comparisons between large and small verb size groups as a measure of lexical composition were also conducted. Our findings indicate that, after controlling for gender, birth order, ethnicity and socioeconomic status, total vocabulary size at age 2 can significantly predict subsequent language and literacy achievement up to fifth grade. Moreover, vocabulary size is a better predictor of later language ability than lexical composition.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Bates, E., Bretherton, I., & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, D. J., Goldfield, B. A., & Reznick, J. S. (2002). Alternative approaches to analyzing individual differences in the rate of early vocabulary development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 313335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowey, J. A. (1994). Phonological sensitivity in novice readers and non-readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 134159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruck, M. (1998). Outcomes of adults with childhood histories of dyslexia. In Hulme, C., Joshi, R., & Malatesha, J. (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 179200). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bryant, P. E., MacLean, M., Bradley, L. L., & Crossland, J. (1990). Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read. Developmental Psychology, 26, 429438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Vicari, S., Longobardi, E., Lami, L., Pizzoli, C., & Stella, G. (1998). Gestures and words in early development of children with Down syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 11251135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catts, H. W. (1993). The relationship between speech–language impairments and reading disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 948958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaney, C. (1998). Preschool language and metalinguistic skills are links to reading success. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 371394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti-Ramsden, G., & Jones, M. (1997). Verb use in specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 12981313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, H., Connor, C., & Washington, J. (2003). Early positive predictors of later reading comprehension for African American students: A preliminary investigation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 3143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dale, P. S., Bates, E., Reznick, S., & Morisset, C. (1989). The validity of a parent report instrument of child language at 20 months. Journal of Child Language, 16, 239250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, P. S., Price, T. S., Bishop, D. V. M., & Plomin, R. (2003). Outcomes of early language delay: Predicting persistent and transient language difficulties at 3 and 4 years. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 544560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, F. B. (1942). Two new measures of reading ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 33, 365372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, P. R., & Leseman, P. P. (2001). Lasting effects of home literacy on reading achievement in school. Journal of School Pscyhology, 39, 389414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, D., McCabe, A., Anastasopoulos, L., Peisner-Feinberg, E., & Poe, M. (2003). The comprehensive language approach to early literacy: The interrelationships among vocabulary, phonological sensitivity, and print knowledge among preschool-aged children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 465481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dionne, G., Dale, P. S., Boivin, M., & Plomin, R. (2003). Genetic evidence for bidirectional effects of early lexical and grammatical development. Child Development, 74, 394412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—III. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Feldman, H. M., Dale, P. S., Campbell, T. F., Colborn, K., Kurs-Lasky, M., Rockette, H. E., et al. (2005). Concurrent and predictive validity of parent reports of child language at ages 2 and 3 years. Child Development, 76, 856868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59 (5, Serial No. 242).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Marchman, V., Thal, D., Dale, P., Reznick, J. S., & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories: User's guide and technical manual (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Goldfield, B., & Reznick, S. (1990). Early lexical acquisition: Rate, content, and the vocabulary spurt. Journal of Child Language, 17, 171183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goswami, U. (2001). Early phonological development and the acquisition of literacy. In Newman, S. B. & Dickinson, D. K. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 111125). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Hoff, E., Laursen, B., & Tardif, T. (2002). Socioeconomic status and parenting. In Bornstein, M. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (2nd ed., pp. 231252). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hoff, E., & Naigles, L. (2002). How children use input in acquiring a lexicon. Child Development, 73, 418433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1998). The relation of birth order and socioeconomic status to children's language experience and language development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 603629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002). Language input at home and at school: Relation to child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 337374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Justice, L., Bowles, R., Turnbull, K., & Skibbe, L. (2009). School readiness among children with varying histories of language difficulties. Developmental Psychology, 45, 460476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kern, S., & Gayraud, F. (2007). Influence of preterm birth on early lexical and grammatical acquisition. First Language, 27, 159173.Google Scholar
Klee, T., Carson, D., Gavin, W., Hall, L., Kent, A., & Reece, S. (1998). Concurrent and predictive validity of an early language screening program. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 627641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klee, T., Pearce, K., & Carson, D. (2000). Improving the positive predictive value of screening for developmental language disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 821833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koster, C., Been, P., Krikhaar, E., Zwarts, F., Diepstra, H., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Differences at 17 months: Productive language patterns in infants at familial risk for dyslexia and typically developing infants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 426438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, C. M., Lombardino, L. J., Walsh, K., Eckert, M. A., Mockler, J. L., Rowe, L. A., et al. (2002). Anatomical risk factors that distinguish dyslexia from SLI predict reading skill in normal children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 35, 501531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyytinen, H., Ahonen, T., Eklund, K., Guttorm, T. K., Laakso, M.-L., Leinonen, S., et al. (2001). Developmental pathways of children with and without familial risk for dyslexia during the first years of life. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 535554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyytinen, P. (1997). In search of the precursors of dyslexia: A prospective study of children at risk for reading problems. In Hulme, C. & Snowling, M. (Eds.), Dyslexia: Biology, cognition and intervention (pp. 97107). London: Whurr.Google Scholar
Lyytinen, P. (1999). Varhaisen kommunikaation ja kielen kehityksen arviointimenetelma [Finnish manual for Communicative Development Inventories]. In Jyvaskylan yliopiston lapsitutkimuskeskus ja Niilo Maki Instituutti-Juvaskyla. Finland: University of Jyaskylan.Google Scholar
Lyytinen, P., Poikkeus, A., Laakso, M., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2001). Language development and symbolic play in children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 873886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchman, V., & Bates, E. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphical development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 21, 339366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, J., Stewart, J., Peterman, C., & Dunning, D. (1992). Toward an integrated model of early reading development (Technical Report No. 566). Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.Google Scholar
McGregor, K., Sheng, L., & Smith, B. (2005). The precocious two-year-old: Status of the lexicon and links to the grammar. Journal of Child Language, 32, 563585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMurray, B. (2007). Defusing the childhood vocabulary explosion. Science, 317, 631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metsala, J. L. (1999). Young children's phonological awareness and non-word repetition as a function of vocabulary development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. F., Sedey, A. L., & Miolo, G. (1995). Validity of parent report measures of vocabulary development for children with Down syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 38, 10371044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moyle, M. J., Weismer, S. E., Evans, J. L., & Lindstrom, M. J. (2007). Longitudinal relationships between lexical and grammatical development in typical and late-talking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 508528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naigles, L., & Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1998). Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children's early verb use. Journal of Child Language, 25, 95120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network. (2000). The relation of child care to cognitive and language development. Child Development, 71, 960980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network. (2005). Pathways to reading: The role of oral language in the transition to reading. Developmental Psychology, 41, 428442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, R., Ratner, N. B., Jusczyk, A. M., Jusczyk, P. W., & Dow, K. A. (2006). Infants’ early ability to segment the conversational speech signal predicts later language development: A restrospective analysis. Developmental Psychology, 42, 643655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, B. A., Rowe, M. L., Singer, J., & Snow, C. E. (2005). Maternal correlates of growth in toddler vocabulary production in low-income families. Child Development, 76, 763782.Google ScholarPubMed
Paul, R. (1993). Patterns of development in late talkers: Preschool years. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 15, 714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, R. (2001). Predicting outcomes of early expressive language delay: Ethical implication. In Bishop, D. & Leonard, L. (Eds.), Speech and language impairments in children. Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome (2nd ed., pp. 195209). East Sussex: Psychology Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Pearson, P. D., Hiebert, E. H., & Kamil, M. L. (2007). Vocabulary assessment: What we know and what we need to learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 282296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, T. S., Eley, T. C., Dale, P. S., Stevenson, J., Saudino, K., & Plomin, R. (2000). Genetic and environmental covariation between verbal and nonverbal cognitive development in infancy. Child Development, 71, 948959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rescorla, L. (1989). The language development survey. A screening tool for delayed language in toddlers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 11, 1421.Google Scholar
Rescorla, L., & Lee, E. (2000). Language impairment in young children. In Layton, T. & Watson, L. (Eds.), Handbook of early language impairment in children: Nature (pp. 138). Albany, NY: Delmar.Google Scholar
Rescorla, L., Dahlsgaard, K., & Roberts, J. (2000). Late-talking toddlers: MLU and IPSyn outcomes at 3;0 and 4;0. Journal of Child Language, 27, 643664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rescorla, L., Roberts, J., & Dahlsgaard, K. (1997). Late talkers at 2: Outcome at age 3. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 556566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynell, J. K., & Gruber, C. P. (1977). Reynell Developmental Language Scales. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Reznick, J. S., & Schwartz, B. B. (2001). When is an assessment an intervention? Parent perception of infant intentionality and language. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 235257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J. E., Burchinal, M., & Durham, M. (1999). Parents’ report of vocabulary and grammatical development of African-American preschoolers. Child and environmental associations. Child Development, 70, 92106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scarborough, H. (1989). Prediction of reading dysfunction from familial and individual differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 101108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarborough, H. (1990). Index of productive syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarborough, H. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In Neuman, S. B. & Dickinson, D. K. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97110). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Shonkoff, J. P., & Philips, D. A. (2000). From neurons to neighbourhoods: The science of early child development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Silvén, M., Poskiparta, E., Niemi, P., & Voeten, M. (2007). Precursors of reading skill from infancy to first grade in Finnish: Continuity and change in a highly inflected language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 516531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. (2004). Language skills and learning to read. Psychologist, 17, 438441.Google Scholar
Snowling, M., Bishop, D. V., & Stothard, S. E. (2000). Is preschool language impairment a risk factor for dyslexia in adolescence? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 587600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1992). Speculations on the causes and consequences of individual differences in early reading acquisition. In Gough, P. B., Ehri, L. C., & Treiman, R. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 307342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading. London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Stolt, S., Klippi, A., Launonen, K., Munck, P., Lehtonen, L., Lapinleimu, H., et al. (2007). Size and composition of the lexicon in prematurely born very-low-birth-weight and full-term Finnish children at two years of age. Journal of Child Language, 34, 283310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, S. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sulzby, E., & Teale, W. (1991). Emergent literacy. In Barr, R., Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P., & Pearson, P. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 727758). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Teale, W., & Sulzby, E.. (Eds.) (1986). Emergent literacy: Writing and reading. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Thal, D., & Bates, E. (1988). Language and gesture in late talkers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 31, 115123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thal, D., Bates, E., Zappia, M. J., & Oroz, M. (1996). Ties between lexical and grammatical development: Evidence from early talkers. Journal of Child Language, 23, 349368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas-Tate, S., Washington, J., Craig, H., & Packard, M. (2006). Performance of African American preschool and kindergarten students on the expressive vocabulary test. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 143149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsao, F. M., Liu, H. M., & Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 75, 10671084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Kleeck, A. (2008). Providing preschool foundations for later reading comprehension: The importance of and ideas for targeting inferencing in storybook-sharing interventions. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 627643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (2001). Emergent literacy skills, early instruction, and individual differences as determinants of difficulties in learning to read: The case for early intervention. In Neuman, S. B. & Dickinson, D. K. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 295321). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., et al. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weismer, S. (2001). Intervention for children with developmental language delay. In Bishop, D. & Leonard, L. (Eds.), Speech and language impairments in children. Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome (2nd ed., pp. 157176). East Sussex: Psychology Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Weizman, Z. O., & Snow, C. E. (2001). Lexical input as related to children's vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Developmental Psychology, 37, 265279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2001). Emergent literacy: Development from prereaders to readers. In Neuman, S. B. & Dickinson, D. K. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 1129). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W., & Mather, N. (1989). WJ-R-R Tests of Cognitive Ability Standard Battery: Examiner's manual. In Woodcock, R. W. & Johnson, M. B. (Eds.), Woodcock–Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery—Revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W., & Mather, N. (1989–1990). WJ-R-R Tests of Achievement: Examiner's manual. In Woodcock, R. W. & Johnson, M. B. (Eds.), Woodcock–Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery—Revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, I. L., Steiner, V. G., & Pond, R. E. (1979). Preschool Language Scale—Revised edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Size matters: Early vocabulary as a predictor of language and literacy competence
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Size matters: Early vocabulary as a predictor of language and literacy competence
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Size matters: Early vocabulary as a predictor of language and literacy competence
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *