Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-72crv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T00:51:48.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Speech perception and frequency discrimination in good and poor readers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Willy De Weirdt
Willy De Weirdt*
Affiliation:
University of Ghent
*
Dienst voor Psychologie, Rijksuniversiteit Ghent, H. Dunantlaan 2, B-9000-Ghent, Belgium
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relation between speech perception and reading ability was investigated. Identification and discrimination tests with stimuli on a stop consonant place of articulation continuum (/PA/-/IA/) were presented to various groups of good and poor readers (normal first graders on a reading continuum in Study 1, moderately and severely dyslexic and high- and low-achieving normal children in Study 2). In both studies, reading-related perception differences were especially marked in a comparison of actual and predicted (from identification test) discrimination scores, suggesting that the poor readers have special difficulty with a discrimination-specific task demand. In Study 3, reading-group differences still show up if the stimulus pairs of the discrimination test are simply to be repeated (eliminating the similarity judgment factors), and are also very pronounced on a nonspeech discrimination test (with 130 ms pure tones of slightly different frequencies). In Studies 1 and 3 identification slope and phoneme boundary differences between reader groups were found as well. Though these results do not definitely prove the auditory perception hypothesis, they support it. The conditions that should be satisfied by auditory perception tasks in future reading acquisition research are briefly discussed.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 1988 , pp. 163 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Baddeley, A. D. (1979). Working memory and reading. In Kolers, P. A., Wrolstadt, M. E., & Bouma, H. (Eds.), Processing of visible language (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Baker, R. J., & Nelder, J. (1978). The GLIM system. Release 3. Generalised linear interactive modeling. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, England.Google Scholar
Ballet, C. (1981). Synthese van spraak uit fonetische gegevens. [Speech synthesis from phonetic data]. Laboratory for Electronics and Metrology, State University of Ghent.Google Scholar
Baron, J., & Treiman, R. (1980). Some problems in the study of differences in cognitive processes. Memory and Cognition, 8, 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelson, P., Morais, J., Alegria, J., & Content, A. (1985). Phonetic analysis capacity and learning to read. Nature, 313, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisanz, G. L., Das, J. P., & Mancini, G. (1984). Children's memory for phonemically confusable and nonconfusable letters: Changes with age and reading ability. Child Development, 55, 1845–1854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blank, M. (1968). Cognitive processes in auditory discrimination in normal and retarded readers Child Development, 39, 1091–1101.Google Scholar
Brady, S., Shankweiler, D., & Mann, V. A. (1983). Speech perception and memory coding in relation to reading ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 345–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brus, B. T., & Voeten, M. J. M. (1973). Een minuut test. Vorm A en B. Nijmegen, Berkhout.Google Scholar
Byrne, B., & Shea, P. (1979). Semantic and phonetic memory codes in beginning readers. Memory & Cognition, 7, 333–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dermody, P., Mackie, K., & Katsch, R. (1983). Dichotic listening in good and poor readers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 341–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Weirdt, W. (1987). Age differences in a place of articulation phoneme boundary. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 101–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1964). Probit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Godfrey, J. J., Syrdal-Lasky, A. K., Millay, K., & Knox, C. M. (1981). Performance of dyslexic children on speech perception tests. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32, 401–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Govaerts, G. (1978). Perceptuele structuren van synthetische en natuurlijke klinkers. [Perceptual structure of synthetic and natural vowels]. Psychologica Belgica, 18, 21–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. W., Wilson, K. P., Humphreys, M. S., Tinzmann, M. B., & Bowyer, P. M. (1983). Phonemic similarity effects in good versus poor readers. Memory & Cognition, 11, 520–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorm, A. F. (1983). Specific reading retardation and working memory: A review. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 311–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laine, R. A., & Baumeister, A. A. (1985). Short-term memory for a pure-tone stimulus among mentally retarded and nonretarded persons. Intelligence, 9, 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, V. A., Liberman, I. Y., & Shankweiler, D. (1980). Children's memory for sentences and word strings in relation to reading ability. Memory & Cognition, 8, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martens, J. P. (1984). Conducting nonadaptive psychoacoustic or biomedical tests by means of an interactive program. Computer Programs in Biomedicine, 19, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, R. K., Davidson, B. J., Kliegl, R., & Davies, S. E. (1984). Development of phonetic memory in disabled and normal readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perfetti, C. A., & McCutchen, (1982). Speech processes in reading. In E. Lass (Ed.), Speech and language. Advances in basic research and practice (Vol. 7), 237–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., Mark, L. S., Fowler, C. A., & Fischer, F. W. (1979). The speech code and learning to read. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 531–545.Google Scholar
Sipe, S., & Engle, R. W. (1986). Echoic memory processes in good and poor readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12, 403–412.Google ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Feeman, D. J. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive skills and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 278–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain and Language, 9, 182–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valtin, R. (1978). Dyslexia: Deficit in reading or deficit in research? (Critical comments on the methodological and theoretical aspects of research on legasthenie.) Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vellutino, F. R. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and Research. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar