Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T02:21:22.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Utilization of prosodic and linguistic cues during perceptions of nonunderstandings in radio communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2016

JAIME C. AUTON ,
MARK W. WIGGINS ,
BEN J. SEARLE  and
NAN XU RATTANASONE
JAIME C. AUTON*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
MARK W. WIGGINS
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
BEN J. SEARLE
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
NAN XU RATTANASONE
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Jaime Auton, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia. E-mail: jaime.auton@mq.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The readback/hearback loop is a communicative protocol used in many high-risk environments to ensure that a verbal instruction has been heard correctly by a receiver. However, it does not necessarily ensure that an instruction has been understood. Using an international sample of hydroelectric power generation controllers, this study examined whether particular linguistic (complete and partial readbacks) and prosodic (final intonation, filler, and interturn delay) cues contained within a readback response could signal to listeners the extent to which speakers had understood an instruction. The results indicated that different prosodic cues are used to detect nonunderstandings, depending upon the linguistic content of the readback. The results have implications for training and system design in distributed environments.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , May 2017 , pp. 509 - 539
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Air Accidents Investigation Branch. (2008). Boeing 737-500, SP-LKA (Report No. EW/C2007/06/02). Retrieved from http://www.aaib.gov.uk/publications/bulletins/june_2008/boeing_737_500__sp_lka.cfm Google Scholar
Australian Transport Safety Bureau. (2007). Radiotelephony readback compliance and its relationship to surface movement control frequency congestion (Investigation Report No. B2006/0053). Retrieved from http://www.atsb.gov.au/media/29962/b20060053.pdf Google Scholar
Auton, J. C., Wiggins, M. W., Searle, B. J., Loveday, T., & Xu Rattanasone, N. (2013). Prosodic cues used during perceptions of nonunderstandings in radio communication. Journal of Communication, 63, 600–616. doi:10.1111/jcom.12033 Google Scholar
Baggaley, A. R., & Hull, A. L. (1983). The effect of nonlinear transformation on a Likert scale. Evaluation & Health Professions, 6, 483–491.Google Scholar
Barshi, I., & Farris, C. (2013). Misunderstandings in ATC communication: Lanugage, cognition, and experimental methodolgy. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Billings, C. E., & Cheaney, E. S. (1981). The information transfer problem: Summary and comments. In Billings, C. E. & Cheaney, E. S. (Eds.), Information transfer problems in the aviation system (Report No. NASA TP-1875). Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.Google Scholar
Billings, C. E., & Reynard, W. D. (1981). Dimensions of the information transfer problem. In Billings, C. E. & Cheaney, E. S. (Eds.), Information transfer problems in the aviation system (Report No. NASA TP-1875). Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1985). Intonation and its parts. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Brennan, S. E., & Williams, M. (1995). The feeling of another's knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 383–398. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1017 Google Scholar
Cardosi, K. M. (1993). An analysis of en route controller–pilot voice communications (Report No. DOT/FAA/RD-93/11). Washington, DC: Research and Development Administration Transportation Systems Center.Google Scholar
Carifio, J., & Perla, R. J. (2007). Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 106–116. doi:10.3844/jssp.2007.106.116 Google Scholar
Chiang, H.-Y., & Pepper, G. A. (2006). Barriers to nurses’ reporting of medication administration errors in Taiwan. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 38, 392–399. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2006.00133.x Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1994). Managing problems in speaking. Speech Communication, 15, 243–250. doi:10.1016/0167-6393(94)90075-2 Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73–111. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3 Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1987). Collaborating on contributions to conversations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 19–41. doi:10.1080/01690968708406350 Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259–294. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_7 Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7 Google Scholar
Coderre, S., Mandin, H., Harasym, P. H., & Fick, G. H. (2003). Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success. Medical Education, 37, 695–703. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01577.x Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1981). Falls and rises: Meanings and universals. Journal of Linguistics, 17, 77–91. doi:10.1017/S0022226700006782 Google Scholar
Cushing, S. (1994). Fatal words: Communication clashes and aircraft crashes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cushing, S. (1995). Pilot–air traffic control communications: It's not (only) what you say, it's how you say it. Flight Safety Digeset, 14, 1–10.Google Scholar
Dascal, M., & Berenstein, I. (1987). Two modes of understanding: Comprehending and grasping. Language and Communication, 7, 139–151. doi:10.1016/0271-5309(87)90004-8 Google Scholar
Davidson, J. (1984). Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 102–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Denes, P., & Milton-William, J. (1962). Further studies in intonation. Language and Speech, 5, 1–14. doi:10.1177/002383096200500101 Google Scholar
Drummond, K., & Hopper, R. (1991). Misunderstanding and its remedies: Telephone miscommunication. In Coupland, N., Giles, H., & Wiemann, J. (Eds.), “Miscomunication” and problematic talk (pp. 301–314). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Fay, N., Page, A. C., & Serfaty, C. (2010). Listeners influence speakers’ perceived communication effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 689–692. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.02.012 Google Scholar
Federal Aviation Administration. (2014). Aeronautical information manual. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim/index.htm Google Scholar
Federal Aviation Administration. (2015). Air traffic organization policy (Report No. JO 7110.65W). Retrieved from https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/ATC.pdf Google Scholar
Gary, M. S., & Wood, R. E. (2011). Mental models, decision rules and performance heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 594, 569–594. doi:10.1002/smj.899 Google Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1961). A comparative study of two hesitation phenomena. Language and Speech, 4, 18–26. doi:10.1177/002383096100400102 Google Scholar
Greenberg, C. C., Regenbogen, S. E., Studdert, D. M., Lipsitz, S. R., Rogers, S. O., Zinner, M. J., & Gawande, A. A. (2007). Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 204, 533–540. doi:10.1016/j. jamcollsurg.2007.01.010 Google Scholar
Hirst, G., McRoy, S., Heeman, P., Edmonds, P., & Horton, D. (1994). Repairing conversational misunderstandings and non-understandings. Speech Communication, 15, 213–229. doi:10.1016/0167-6393(94)90073-6 Google Scholar
Hunter, M. (2004). The music is the message: Prosody in aviation discourse. In Turney, M. A. (Ed.), Tapping diverse talent in aviation: Culture, gender, and diversity (pp. 129–151). Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2007). Manual of radiotelephony (Report No. Doc 9432 AN/925). Retreived from http://www.aeroclubvercelli.it/download/Manual%20of%20RT%20DOC%209432%20-%204%20ed.%202007.pdf Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a “standard maximum” silence of approximately one second in conversation. In Roger, D. & Bull, P. (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 166–196). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Jones, R. K. (2003). Miscommunication between pilots and air traffic control. Language Problems and Language Planning, 27, 233–248. doi:10.1075/lplp.27.3.03jon Google Scholar
Kanki, B. G., & Smith, G. M. (2001). Training aviation communication skills. In Salas, E., Bowers, C. A., & Edens, E. (Eds.), Improving teamwork in organizations (pp. 31–54). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. H., & Torreira, F. (2015). The timing and construction of preference: A quantitative study. Discourse Processes, 52, 255–289. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2014.955997 Google Scholar
Keysar, B., & Henly, A. S. (2002). Speakers’ overestimation of their effectiveness. Psychological Science, 13, 207–212. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00439 Google Scholar
Kim, H. (2002). The form and function of next-turn repetition in English conversation. Language Research, 38, 51–81.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Park, J., Han, S., & Kim, H. (2010). Development of extended speech act coding scheme to observe communication characteristics of human operators of nuclear power plants under abnormal conditions. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 23, 539–548. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2010.04.005 Google Scholar
Litchfield, D., Ball, L. J., Donovan, T., Manning, D. J., & Crawford, T. (2010). Viewing another person's eye movements improves identification of pulmonary nodules in chest x-ray inspection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 251–262. doi:10.1037/a0020082 Google Scholar
Maurer, T. J., & Pierce, H. R. (1998). A comparison of Likert scale and traditional measures of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 324–329.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. doi:10.1037/h0043158 Google Scholar
Morrow, D., Lee, A., & Rodvold, M. (1993). Analysis of problems in routine controller–pilot communication. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 285–302. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0304_3 Google Scholar
Morrow, D., Rodvold, M., & Lee, A. (1994). Nonroutine transactions in controller–pilot communication. Discourse Processes, 17, 235–258. doi:10.1080/01638539409544868 Google Scholar
Nevile, M., & Walker, M. B. (2005). Analysis of crew conversations provides for accident investigation. Flight Safety Digest, 24, 1–32.Google Scholar
Norrick, N. (1987). Functions of repetition in conversation. Text, 7, 245–264.Google Scholar
Nygaard, L. C., Herold, D. S., & Namy, L. L. (2009). The semantics of prosody: Acoustic and perceptual evidence of prosodic correlates to word meaning. Cognitive Science, 33, 127–146. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01007.x Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. D., & Arnold, G. F. (1961). Intonation of colloquial English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Orasanu, J., & Connolly, T. (1993). The reinvention of decision making. In Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 3–20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Prabhakar, H., Cooper, J. B., Sabel, A., Weckbach, S., Mehler, P. S., & Stahel, P. F. (2012). Introducing standardized “readbacks” to improve patient safety in surgery: A prospective survey in 92 providers at a public safety-net hospital. BMC Surgery, 12, 1–8. doi:10.1186/1471-2482-12-8 Google Scholar
Prinzo, O. V., & Britton, T. W. (1993). ATC/pilot voice communications: A survey of the literature (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-93/20). Washington, DC: Office of Aviation Medicine.Google Scholar
Prinzo, O. V., Hendrix, A. M., & Hendrix, R. (2006). The outcome of ATC message complexity on pilot readback performance (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-06/25). Oklahoma City, OK: FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute.Google Scholar
Roberts, F., & Francis, A. L. (2013). Identifying a temporal threshold of tolerance for silent gaps after requests. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133, EL471–EL477. doi:10.1121/1.4802900 Google Scholar
Roberts, F., Francis, A. L., & Morgan, M. (2006). The interaction of inter-turn silence with prosodic cues in listener perceptions of “trouble” in conversation. Speech Communication, 48, 1079–1093. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2006.02.001 Google Scholar
Roberts, F., Margutti, P., & Takano, S. (2011). Judgments concerning the valence of inter-turn silence across speakers of American English, Italian, and Japanese. Discourse Processes, 48, 331–354. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2011.558002 Google Scholar
Robinson, J. D. (2013). Epistemics, action formation, and other-initiation of repair: The case of partial questioning repeats. In Hayashi, M., Raymond, G., & Sidnell, J. (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 261–292). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation's turn-taking organisation. In Button, G. & Lee, J. R. E. (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 70–85). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Practice and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repairs. Discourse Processes, 23, 499–545. doi:10.1080/01638539709545001 Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2000). When “others” initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21, 205–243. doi:10.1093/applin/21.2.205 Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041 Google Scholar
Schneider, V. I., Healy, A. F., & Barshi, I. (2004). Effects of instruction modality and readback on accuracy in following navigation commands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 245–257. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.10.4.245 Google Scholar
Shimojima, A., Katagiri, Y., Koiso, H., & Swerts, M. (2002). Informational and dialogue-coordinating functions of prosodic features of Japanese echoic responses. Speech Communication, 36, 113–132. doi:10.1016/S0167-6393(01)00029-2 Google Scholar
Skantze, G. (2005). Exploring human error recovery strategies: Implications for spoken dialogue systems. Speech Communication, 45, 325–341. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2004.11.005 Google Scholar
Smeeton, N. J., Williams, A. M., Hodges, N. J., & Ward, P. (2005). The relative effectiveness of various instructional approaches in developing anticipation skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 98–110. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.11.2.98 Google Scholar
Soskin, W. F. (1953). Symposium: Communication in the counselling situation. American Psychologist, 8, 272.Google Scholar
Streitenberger, K., Breen-Reid, K., & Harris, C. (2006). Handoffs in care—Can we make them safer? Pediatric Clinics of North Americalinics of North America, 53, 1185–1195. doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2006.09.010 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285. doi:10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7 Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (l987). Repetition in conversation: Toward a poetics of talk. Language, 63, 574–605.Google Scholar
Weigand, E. (1999). Misunderstanding: The standard case. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 763–785. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00068-X Google Scholar
Wiggins, M. W., & O'Hare, D. (2003). Weatherwise: Evaluation of a cue-based training approach for the recognition of deteriorating weather conditions during flight. Human Factors, 45, 337–345. doi:10.1518/hfes.45.2.337.27246 Google Scholar