Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T06:08:57.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An analysis of the spelling errors of children who differ in their reading and spelling skills

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Margaret Bruck  and
Gloria Waters
Margaret Bruck*
Affiliation:
McGill University
Gloria Waters
Affiliation:
McGill University
*
Margaret Bruck McGill-Montreal Children's Hospital Learning Center, 3640 Mountain St., Montreal, Quebec H3 G2A8, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Results of recent studies comparing the spelling errors of children with varying discrepancies between their reading and spelling skills have yielded conflicting results. Some studies suggest that good readers-poor spellers (mixed) are characterized by a set of deficits that differentiates them from poor readers-poor spellers (poor). Other studies fail to find differences between groups of poor spellers who differ in their reading skills. The present study attempted to determine the degree to which these discrepant results reflected differences in methods of subject selection and of error analysis. Two different sets of criteria were used to identify poor spellers-good readers. Subjects were selected on the basis of standardized reading comprehension and spelling test scores or on the basis of standardized single-word-recognition and spelling-test scores. The phonetic accuracy of the spelling errors was assessed using two different scoring systems – one that took positional constraints into account and one that did not. In addition, children were identified at two different age levels, allowing for developmental comparisons. Regardless of age or reading ability, poor and mixed spellers had difficulty converting sounds into positionally appropriate graphemes. Only older children with good word recognition but poor spelling skills provided some evidence for a distinct subgroup of poor spellers. These children had relatively good visual memory for words and, unlike other poor spellers, showed relatively good use of rudimentary sound-letter correspondences.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 1988 , pp. 77 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Backman, J., Bruck, M., Hebert, M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1984). Acquisition and use of spelling-sound information in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boder, E. (1973). Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading-spelling patterns. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 15, 663–687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, M. E. (1980). Development of components of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 656–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In Frith, U. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. Academic Press: London.Google Scholar
Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, L. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jorm, A. F. (1981). Children with reading and spelling retardation: Functioning of whole-word and correspondence-rule mechanisms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22, 171–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juel, C., Griffith, P., & Gough, P. (1986). Acquisition of Literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmquist, E. (1958). Factors related to reading disabilities in the first grade of the elementary school. Stockholm: Malmquist and Wiksell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, H. E., & Warrington, E. K. (1974). Developmental spelling retardation and its relation to other cognitive abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 65, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1982). Individual differences in the cognitive processes of reading I.: Word decoding. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 485–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K., Cunningham, A. E., & Freeman, D. J. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive skills, and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 278–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K., Nathan, R., & Vala-Rossi, M. (1986). Developmental changes in the cognitive correlates of reading ability and the developmental lag hypothesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R. (1984). Individual differences among children in spelling and reading styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 464–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waters, G. W., & Bruck, M. (1987). An analysis of the reading and spelling skills of poor spellers with good reading comprehension skills. Paper presented at the Third World Congress of Dyslexia, Crete.Google Scholar
Waters, G., Seidenberg, M., & Bruck, M. (1984). Children's and adults' use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks. Memory and Cognition. 12, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waters, G., Bruck, M., & Seidenberg, M. (1985). Do children use similar cognitive processes to read and spell words? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 511–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar