Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Artificial grammar learning in Williams syndrome and in typical development: The role of rules, familiarity, and prosodic cues

  • VESNA STOJANOVIK (a1), VITOR ZIMMERER (a2), JANE SETTER (a1), KERRY HUDSON (a1), ISIL POYRAZ-BILGIN (a1) and DOUG SADDY (a1)...
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Artificial grammar learning is an empirical paradigm that investigates basic pattern and structural processing in different populations. It can inform how higher cognitive functions, such as language use, take place. Our study used artificial grammar learning to assess how children with Williams syndrome (WS; n = 16) extract patterns in structured sequences of synthetic speech, how they compare to typically developing (TD) children (n = 60), and how prosodic cues affect learning. The TD group was divided into a group whose nonverbal abilities were within the range of the WS group, and a group whose chronological age was within the range of the WS group. TD children relied mainly on rule-based generalization when making judgments about sequence acceptability, whereas children with WS relied on familiarity with specific stimulus combinations. The TD participants whose nonverbal abilities were similar to the WS group showed less evidence of relying on grammaticality than TD participants whose chronological age was similar to the WS group. In absence of prosodic cues, the children with WS did not demonstrate evidence of learning. Results suggest that, in WS children, the transition to rule-based processing in language does not keep pace with TD children and may be an indication of differences in neurocognitive mechanisms.

Copyright
Corresponding author
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Vesna Stojanovik, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AL, UK. E-mail: v.stojanovik@reading.ac.uk
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R. A. Abrams , & S. E. Christ (2003). Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science, 14, 427432. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01458

C. M. Beach , W. F. Katz , & A. Skowronski (1996). Children's processing of prosodic cues for phrasal interpretation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 11481160.

U. Bellugi , L. Lichtenberger , W. Jones , Z. Lai , & M. George St. (2000). I. The neurocognitive profile of Williams Syndrome: A complex pattern of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 (Suppl. 1), 729. doi:10.1162/089892900561959

U. Bellugi , L. Lichtenberger , D. Mills , A. Galaburda , & J. R. Korenberg (1999). Bridging cognition, the brain and molecular genetics: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Trends in Neurosciences, 22, 197207. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01397-1

A. M. Bihrle , U. Bellugi , D. Delis , & S. Marks (1989). Seeing either the forest or the trees: Dissociation in visuospatial processing. Brain and Cognition, 11, 3749. doi:10.1016/0278-2626(89)90003-1

J. Brock (2007). Language abilities in Williams syndrome: A critical review. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 97127. doi:10.1017/S095457940707006X

R. Brown (1973). A first language: The early stages. London: Allen & Unwin.

C. Catterall , S. Howard , V. Stojanovik , M. Szczerbinski , & B. Wells (2006). Investigating prosodic ability in Williams Syndrome. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 20, 7–8, 531538.

M. H. Christiansen , L. M. Kelly , R. Shillock , & K. Greenfield (2010). Impaired artificial grammar learning in agrammatism. Cognition, 116, 382393. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.015

C. M. Conway , A. Bauernschmidt , S. S. Huang , & D. B. Pisoni (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114, 356371. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.009

C. Deruelle , J. Mancini , M. O. Livet , C. Cassé Perrot , & S. de Schonen (1999). Configural and local processing of faces in children with Williams syndrome. Brain and Cognition, 41, 276298. doi:10.1006/brcg.1999.1127

C. Deruelle , D. Schon , C. Rondan , & J. Mancini (2005). Global and local music perception in children with Williams syndrome. NeuroReport, 16, 631634.

P. F. Dominey , M. Hoen , J.-M. Blanc , & T. Lelekov-Boissard (2003). Neurological basis of language and sequential cognition: Evidence from simulation, aphasia, and ERP studies. Brain and Language, 86, 207225. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00529-1

A. J. Don , E. G. Schellenberg , A. S. Reber , K. M. Di Girolamo , & P. P. Wang (2003). Implicit learning in children and adults with Williams syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23, 201225. doi:10.1207/S15326942DN231&2_9

D. H. D'Souza , D. Moretti-Ferreira , & L. M. S. S. Rugolo (2007). Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) as a diagnostic tool for Williams-Beuren syndrome. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 30, 1720. doi:10.1590/S1415-47572007000100005

M. Elsabbagh , H. Cohen , & A. Karmiloff-Smith (2010). Discovering structure in auditory input: Evidence from Williams syndrome. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115, 128139. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-115.2.128

E. K. Farran , C. Jarrold , & S. E. Gathercole (2003). Divided attention, selective attention and drawing: Processing preferences in Williams syndrome are dependent on the task administered. Neuropsychologia, 41, 676687. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00219-1

L. R. Gleitman , H. Gleitman , B. Landau , & E. Wanner (1988). Where learning begins: Initial representations for language learning. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey: Vol. 3. Language: Psychological and biological aspects (pp. 150193). New York: Cambridge University Press.

J. Grant , V. Valian , & A. Karmiloff-Smith (2002). A study of relative clauses in Williams syndrome. Journal of Child Language, 29, 403416. doi:10.1017/S030500090200510X

S. J. Grice , M. de Haan , H. Halit , M. Johnson , G. Csibra , J. Grant , & A. Karmiloff-Smith (2003). ERP abnormalities of illusory contour perception in Williams syndrome. NeuroReport, 14, 17731777. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000094161.86963.c5

K. Hirsh-Pasek , D. G. Kemler-Nelson , P. W. Jusczyk , K. W. Cassidy , B. Druss , & L. Kennedy (1987). Clauses are perceptual units for young infants. Cognition, 26, 269286. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(87)80002-1

V. Joffe , & S. Varlokosta (2007). Patterns of syntactic development in children with Williams syndrome and Down's syndrome: Evidence from passives and wh-questions. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21, 705727. doi:10.1080/02699200701541375

P. W. Jusczyk , A. Cutler , & N. J. Redanz (1993). Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development, 64, 675687.

P. W. Jusczyk , K. Hirsch-Pasek , D. G. Kemler Nelson , L. J. Kennedy , A. Woodward , & J. Piwoz (1992). Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 252293. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90009-Q

A. Karmiloff-Smith (2012). Perspectives on the dynamic development of cognitive capacities: In- sights from Williams syndrome. Current Opinion in Neurology, 25, 106111. doi:10.1097/WCO.0b013e3283518130

A. Karmiloff-Smith , M. Thomas , D. Annaz , K. Humphreys , S. Ewing , N. Brace , . . . R. Campbell (2004). Exploring the Williams syndrome face-processing debate: The importance of building developmental trajectories. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 12581274. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00322.x

A. P. Key , & E. M. Dykens (2011). Electrophysiological study of local/global processing in Williams syndrome. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 3, 2838. doi:10.1007/s11689-010-9064-1

B. J. Knowlton , & L. R. Squire (1994). The information acquired during artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 7991. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.1.79

D. J. Levitin , & U. Bellugi (1998). Musical abilities in people with Williams syndrome. Music Perception, 15, 357389.

D. J. Levitin , K. Cole , M. Chiles , Z. Lai , A. Lincoln , & U. Bellugi (2004). Characterizing the musical phenotype in individuals with Williams syndrome. Child Neuropsychology, 10, 223247.

G. F. Marcus , S. Vijayan , S. B. Rao , & P. M. Vishton (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 7780.

P. Martinez-Castilla , V. Stojanovik , J. Setter , & M. Sotillo (2012). Prosodic abilities in Spanish and English children with Williams syndrome: A cross-linguistic study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 112.

S. L. Mattys , L. White , & J. F. Melhorn (2005). Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 477500. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.477

M. T. Maybery , M. Taylor , & A. O'Brien-Malone (1995). Implicit learning: Sensitive to age but not IQ. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, 817. doi:10.1080/00049539508258763

E. McMullen , & J. Saffran (2004). Music and language: A developmental comparison. Music Perception, 21, 289311.

C. B. Mervis , & A. E. John (2008). Vocabulary abilities of children with Williams syndrome: Strengths, weaknesses, and relation to visuospatial construction ability. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 967982. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/071)

C. B. Mervis , & B. P. Klein-Tasman (2000). Williams syndrome: Cognition, personality, and adaptive behaviour. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 6, 148158.

C. B. Mervis , B. F. Robinson , M. L. Rowe , A. M. Becerra , & B. P. Klein-Tasman (2004). Relations between language and cognition in Williams syndrome. In S. Bartke & J. Siegmüller (Eds.), Williams syndrome across languages (pp. 6392). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

D. Mobbs , M. A. Eckert , V. Menon , D. Mills , J. Korenberg , A. M. Galaburda , & A. L. Reiss (2007). Reduced parietal and visual cortical activation during global processing in Williams syndrome. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49, 433438. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00433.x

C. J. Mondloch , R. Le Grand , & D. Maurer (2002). Configural face-processing develops more slowly than featural face-processing. Perception, 31, 553566. doi:10.1068/p3339

J. L. Morgan , R. P. Meier , & E. L. Newport (1987). Structural packaging in the input to language learning: Contributions of prosodic and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 498550. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90017-X

T. Nazzi , S. J. Paterson , & A. Karmiloff-Smith (2003). Word segmentation by infants with Williams syndrome. Infancy, 4, 251271. doi:10.1207/S15327078IN0402_06

J. R. Pani , C. B. Mervis , & B. F. Robinson (1999). Global spatial organization by individuals with Williams syndrome. Psychological Science, 10, 453458.

A. Patel (2003). Language, music, and the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 674681.

E. V. Pavlidou , J. M. Williams , & L. M. Kelly (2009). Artificial grammar learning in primary school children with and without developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 59, 5577. doi:10.1007/s11881-009-0023-z

P. Perruchet , & C. Pacteau (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264275. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.119.3.264

K. M. Petersson , V. Folia , & P. Hagoort (2012). What artificial grammar learning reveals about the neurobiology of syntax. Brain and Language, 120, 8395. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2010.08.003

K. M. Petersson , C. Forkstam , & M. Ingvar (2004). Artificial syntactic violations activate Broca's region. Cognitive Science, 28, 383407. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2803_4

N. Poirel , E. Mellet , O. Houdé , & A. Pineau (2008). First came the trees, then the forest: Developmental changes during childhood in the processing of visual local–global patterns according to the meaningfulness of the stimuli. Developmental Psychology, 44, 245253. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.245

E. M. Pothos (2007). Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 227244. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.227

M. Redington , & N. Chater (1996). Transfer in artificial grammar learning: A reevaluation. Jour- nal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 123138. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.123

J. Reilly , E. S. Klima , & U. Bellugi (1990). Once more with feeling: Affect and language in atypical populations. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 367391.

J. R. Saffran , R. N. Aslin , & E. L. Newport (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 19261928.

T. Stevens , & A. Karmiloff-Smith (1997). Word learning in a special population: Do individuals with Williams syndrome obey lexical constraints? Journal of Child Language, 24, 737765.

V. Stojanovik (2010). Understanding and production of prosody in children with Williams syndrome: A developmental trajectory approach. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 23, 112126. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.11.001

V. Stojanovik , M. Perkins , & S. Howard (2004). Williams syndrome and specific language impairment do not support claims for developmental double dissociations and innate modularity. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 403424. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2004.01.002

V. Stojanovik , J. Setter , & L. van Ewijk (2007). Intonation abilities in children with Williams syndrome: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 16101617.

P. Strømme , P. G. Bjømstad , & K. Ramstad (2002). Prevalence estimation of Williams syndrome. Journal of Child Neurology, 17, 269271. doi:10.1177/088307380201700406

M. Tassabehji , K. Metcalfe , A. Karmiloff-Smith , M. J. Carette , J. Grant , N. Dennis , . . . D. Donnai (1999). Williams syndrome: Use of chromosomal micro-deletions as a tool to dissect cognitive and physical phenotypes. American Journal of Human Genetics, 64, 118125.

S. Tauroza , & D. Allison (1990). Speech rates in British English. Applied Linguistics, 11, 90105. doi:10.1093/applin/11.1.90

K. M. Thomas , & C. A. Nelson (2001). Serial reaction time learning in preschool- and school-age children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 364387. doi:10.1006/jecp.2000.2613

S. C. M. Thomas , J. Grant , Z. Barham , M. Dsodl , E. Laing , L. Lakusta , . . . Karmloff-Smith, A. (2001). Past tense formation in Williams syndrome. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 143176. doi:10.1080/01690960042000021

S. E. Trehub (2003). The developmental origins of music. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 669673.

A. Vinter , & P. Perruchet (2000). Implicit learning in children is not related to age: Evidence from drawing behavior. Child Development, 71, 12231240. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00225

L. Wang , L. Mottron , D. Peng , C. Berthiaume , & M. Dawson (2007). Local bias and local-to-global interference without global deficit: A robust finding in autism under various conditions of attention, exposure time, and visual angle. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 550574. doi:10.1080/13546800701417096

P. P. Wang , S. Doherty , S. B. Rourke , & U. Bellugi (1995). Unique profile of visuo-perceptual skills in a genetic syndrome. Brain and Cognition, 29, 5465. doi:10.1006/brcg.1995.1267

A. W. Young , D. Hellawell , & D. C. Hay (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747759. doi:10.1068/p160747

A. Ypsilanti , G. Grouios , A. Alevriadou , & K. Tsapkini (2005). Expressive and receptive vocabulary in children with Williams and Down syndromes. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 353364. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00654.x

V. C. Zimmerer , P. E. Cowell , & R. A. Varley (2011). Individual behavior in learning of an artificial grammar. Memory & Cognition, 39, 491501. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0039-y

V. C. Zimmerer , P. E. Cowell , & R. A. Varley (2014). Artificial grammar learning in individuals with severe aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 53, 2538. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.014

V. C. Zimmerer , & R. A. Varley (2015). A case of “order insensitivity”? Natural and artificial language processing in a man with primary progressive aphasia. Cortex, 69, 212219. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.006

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Applied Psycholinguistics
  • ISSN: 0142-7164
  • EISSN: 1469-1817
  • URL: /core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 21 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 180 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 17th July 2017 - 21st August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.