Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kn6lq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T17:25:23.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in processing adverbial conjuncts throughout adulthood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Ronald L. Bloom ,
Jeanne Mullin  and
Peter J. Paternostro
Ronald L. Bloom*
Affiliation:
Hofstra University
Peter J. Paternostro
Affiliation:
St. Mary's Children's Hospital
*
Ronald L. Bloom, 110 Hofstra University, Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, Davision Hall, Hempstead, NY 11550
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the use and understanding of concordant (e.g., consequently, moreover) and discordant (e.g., rather, contrastively) adverbial conjuncts in the later part of the life span. The participants, 75 neurologically healthy young (mean age 21.8), middle-aged (mean age 51.7), and elderly (mean age 73.1) adults, were examined using procedures by Nippold, Schwarz, and Undlin (1992). Groups were matched for education level. The results indicate a significant decline in processing adverbial conjuncts in the elderly. Discordant adverbial conjuncts especially challenged the linguistic processing abilities of the elderly subjects. The age- related decline in processing adverbial conjuncts.appears to be a specific deficit in linguistic processing that is independent of problems in memory or the effects of exposure to sophisticated language forms.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 105 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Au, R. & Bowles, N. (1991). Memory influences on language in normal aging. In Ripich, D. (Ed.), Handbook of geriatric communication disorders (pp. 293–306). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Benjamin, B. J. (1988). Changes in speech production and linguistic behaviors with aging. In Shadden, B. (Ed.), Commnunication behavior and aging: A sourcebook for clinicians (pp. 162–181). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Bowles, N., & Poon, L. (1988). Age and context effects in lexical decision: An age by context interaction. ExperimentalAging Research, 14, 201–205.Google Scholar
Cohen, G., & Faulkner, D. (1983). Word recognition: Age differences in contextual facilitation effects. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 239–251.Google Scholar
Emery, O. (1986). Linguistic decrement in normal aging. Language and Communication, 6, 47–64.Google Scholar
Feier, C., & Gerstman, L. J. (1980). Sentence comprehension abilities throughout the adult life span. Journal of Gerontology, 35, 722–728.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Hollingshead, A. (1977). Four-factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
Kemper, S. (1986). Imitation of complex syntactic constructions by elderly adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 277–287.Google Scholar
Kemper, S. (1988). Geriatric psycholinguistics: Syntactic limitations of oral and written language. In Light, L. & Burke, D. (Eds.), Language, memory, and aging. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kynette, D., & Kemper, S. (1986). Aging and the loss of grammatical forms: A cross-sectional study of language performance. Language and Communication, 6, 65–72.Google Scholar
Lahey, M. (1988). Language disorders and language development. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nippold, M. A. (1988). The literate lexicon. In Nippold, M. A. (Ed.), Later language development. Ages nine through nineteen (pp. 1–10). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Nippold, M. A., Schwarz, I. E., & Undlin, R. (1992). Use and understanding of adverbial conjuncts: A developmental study of adolescents and young adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 108–118.Google Scholar
Obler, L. K. (1993). Language beyond childhood. In Gleason, J. Berko (Ed.), The development of language (pp. 422–449). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Obler, L. K., & Albert, M. (1981). Language in the elderly aphasic and in the dementing patient. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Obler, L. K., Fein, D., Nicholas, M., and Albert, M. (1991). Auditory comprehension and aging: Decline in syntactic processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 433–452.Google Scholar
Owens, R. E. (1996). Language development: An introduction. New York: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1928). Judgment and reasoning in the child. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Raban, B. (1988). Speaking and writing: Young children's use of connectives. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 4, 13–25.Google Scholar
Rybash, J., Hoyer, W., & Roodin, P. (1986). Adult cognition and aging: Developmental changes in processing, knowing and thinking. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Sackett, G. (1978). Observing behavior: Volume 1. Theory and application in mental retardation. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Sandson, J., Obler, L. K., & Albert, M. (1987). Language changes in healthy aging and dementia. In Rosenberg, S. (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ulatowska, H., & Chapman, S. (1991). Discourse studies. In Lubinski, R. (Ed.), Dementia and communication (pp. 115–132). Toronto: B.C. Decker.Google Scholar
Walker, V., Hardiman, C., Hedrick, D., & Holbrook, A. (1988). Speech and language characteristics of an aging population. In Lass, N. (Ed.), Speech and language: Advances in basic research and pracrice (pp. 143–146). New York: Academic.Google Scholar