Aoun, J., & Li, A. Y.-H. (1989). Scope and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 141–172.
Brooks, P. J., & Brain, M. D. S. (1996). What do all children know about the universal quantifiers all and each?
Cognition, 60, 235–268.
Brooks, P. J., Braine, M. D. S., Jia, G., & da Graca Dias, M. (2001). Early representations of all, each, and their counterparts in Mandarin Chinese and Portuguese. In Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (3rd ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Guasti, M. T., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L. (2001). The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures. In Do, A. H.-J., Domínguez, L., & Johansen, A. (Eds.), BUCLD 25 Proceedings (pp. 157–168). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Conroy, A., Lidz, J., & Musolino, J. (2009). The fleeting isomorphism effect. Language Acquisition, 16, 106–117.
Crain, S., Gardner, A., Gualmini, A., & Rabbin, B. (2002). Children's command of negation. In Otsu, Y. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (pp. 71–95). Tokyo: Hituzi.
Crain, S., Ni, W., & Conway, L. (1994). Learning, parsing, and modularity. In Clifton, C. Jr., Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 443–467). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Fan, L. (2010). Mandarin children's acquisition of the scope relation between negation and universal quantification. Paper presented at the Workshop on Acquisition of Scope and Phrase Structure: Comparative Perspectives, Chinese University of Hong Kong, December 22–23.
Goro, T., & Akiba, S. (2004a). The acquisition of disjunction and positive polarity in Japanese. In Chand, V., Kelleher, A., Rodriguez, A. J., & Schmeiser, B. (Eds.), WCCFL 23 Proceedings (pp. 251–264). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Goro, T., & Akiba, S. (2004b). Japanese disjunction and the acquisition of positive polarity. In Otsu, Y. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (pp. 137–162). Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.
Goro, T., Minai, U., & Crain, S. (2006). Bringing out the logic in child language. In Bateman, L. & Ussery, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (pp. 245–256). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Grice, P. H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Gualmini, A. (2005). The ups and downs of child language: Experimental studies on children's knowledge of entailment relationships and polarity phenomena. New York: Routledge.
Gualmini, A. (2007a). Negation and polarity: The view from child language. In Zeijlstra, H. & Soehn, J.-P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Negation and Polarity (pp. 58–63). Tubingen, Germany: Eberhard Karls.
Gualmini, A. (2007b). Scope resolution in child language: A test for the QAR. In Otsu, Y. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (pp. 121–135). Tokyo: Hituzi.
Gualmini, A. (2008). The rise and fall of isomorphism. Lingua, 118, 1158–1176.
Gualmini, A., & Crain, S. (2002). Why no child or adult must learn de Morgan's laws. In Skarabela, B., Fish, S., & Do, A. H.-J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 243–254). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Gualmini, A., & Crain, S. (2005). The structure of children's linguistic knowledge. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 463–474.
Gualmini, A., Crain, S., Meroni, L., Chierchia, G., & Guasti, M. T. (2001). At the semantics/pragmatics interface in child language. Paper presented at the 11th Semantics and Linguistics Theory Conference, Cornell University.
Gualmini, A., Hulsey, S., Hacquard, V., & Fox, D. (2008). The question–answer requirement for scope assignment. Natural Language Semantics, 16, 205–237.
Gulamini, A., Maciukaite, S., & Crain, S. (2002). Children's insensitivity to contrastive stress in sentences with ONLY. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Penn Linguistics Conference, University of Pennsylvania.
Gualmini, A., & Schwarz, B. (2009). Solving learnability problems in the acquisition of semantics. Journal of Semantics, 26, 185–215.
Guasti, M. T., Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Foppolo, F., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L. (2005). Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 667–696.
Halbert, A., Crain, S., Shankweiler, D., & Woodams, E. (1995). Children's interpretive use of emphatic stress. Poster presented at the 8th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Tucson, AZ.
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1953). Transmission of information concerning concepts through positive and negative instances. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 175–182.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Hulsey, S., Hacquard, V., Fox, D., & Gualmini, A. (2004). The question–answer requirement and scope assignment. In Csirmaz, A., Gualmini, A., & Nevins, A. (Eds.), Plato's problem: Problems in language acquisition (pp. 71–90). Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Kramer, I. (2000). Interpreting indefinites: An experimental study of children's language comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.
Lasnik, H., & Crain, S. (1985). On the acquisition of pronominal reference. Lingua, 65, 135–154.
Lee, T. H.-T. (1986). Studies on quantification in Chinese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Lidz, J., & Musolino, J. (2002). Children's command of quantification. Cognition, 84, 113–154.
Lidz, J., & Musolino, J. (2005/2006). On the quantificational status of indefinites: The view from child language. Language Acquisition, 13, 73–102.
Musolino, J. (1999). What every child doesn't know. In Greenhill, A., Littlefield, H., & Tano, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 2, pp. 495–506). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Musolino, J. (2011). Studying language acquisition through the prism of isomorphism. In de Villiers, J. & Roeper, T. (Eds.), Handbook of generative approaches to language acquisition. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.
Musolino, J., Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (2000). Navigating negative quantificational space. Linguistics, 38, 1–32.
Musolino, J., & Lidz, J. (2006). Why children aren't universally successful with quantification. Linguistics, 44, 817–852.
Notley, A., Zhou, P., Jensen, B., & Crain, S. (2012). Children's interpretation of disjunction in the scope of “before”: A comparison of English and Mandarin. Journal of Child Language, 39, 482–522.
Noveck, I. A. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 78, 165–188.
Szabolcsi, A. (2001). The syntax of scope. In Baltin, M. & Collins, C. (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 607–633). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Zhou, P., & Crain, S. (2009). Scope assignment in child language: Evidence from the acquisition of Chinese. Lingua, 119, 973–988.