Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2010). The role of language aptitude in first language attrition: The case of pre-pubescent attriters. Applied Linguistics, 31, 443–464.
Carroll, J. (1964). Language and thought. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Carroll, J. (1981). Twenty-five years of research in foreign language aptitude. In Diller, K. (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83–118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Carroll, J., & Sapon, S. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test: Form A. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Cedrus. (2003). SuperLab 3.0.7 [Computer software]. San Pedro, CA: Author.
Chapelle, C. (1995). Field independence/dependence in the L2 classroom. In Reid, J. (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 158–168). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Chapelle, C., & Green, P. (1992). Field independence/dependence in second-language acquisition research. Language Learning, 42, 47–83.
Cherry, K. E., & Stadler, M. A. (1995). Implicit learning of a nonverbal sequence in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 10, 379–394.
Conway, C., Bauernschmidt, A., Huang, S., & Pisoni, D. (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114, 356–371.
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1992). NEO-PI-R: The revised NEO Personality Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
de Graaff, R. (1997). The eXperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249–276.
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97–112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
DeKeyser, R., & Koeth, J. (2011). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 395–406). London: Routledge.
Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 343–350.
DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73, 825–858.
DeYoung, C., Shamosh, N., Green, A., Braver, T., & Gray, J. (2009). Intellect as distinct from openness: Differences revealed by fMRI of working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 883–892.
Dienes, Z. (1992). Connectionist and memory-array models of artificial grammar learning. Cognitive Science, 16, 41–79.
Dienes, Z., & Scott, R. (2005). Measuring unconscious knowledge: Distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge. Psychological Research, 69, 338–351.
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Oxford: Blackwell.
Doughty, C., Campbell, S., Mislevy, M., Bunting, M., Bowles, A., & Koeth, J. (2010). Predicting near-native ability: The factor structure and reliability of Hi-LAB. In Prior, M., Watanabe, Y., & Lee, S. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 10–31). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive–experiential self-theory. In Pervin, L. (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 165–192). New York: Guilford Press.
Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724.
Epstein, S. (2008). Intuition from the perspective of cognitive–experiential self-theory. In Plessner, H., Betsch, C., & Betsch, T. (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 23–37). New York: Erlbaum.
Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive–experiential and analytical–rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390–405.
Erlam, R. (2005). Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 27, 464–491.
Evans, J., & Frankish, K. (2009). In two minds: Dual processes and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Granena, G. (2013a). Individual differences in sequence learning ability and SLA in early childhood and adulthood. Language Learning, 63, 665–703.
Granena, G. (2013b). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA Language Aptitude Test. In Granena, G. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 105–129). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, aptitude and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29, 311–343.
Hamrick, P., & Rebuschat, P. (2012). How implicit is statistical learning? In Rebuschat, P. & Williams, J. N. (Eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Jiménez, L. (2002). Attention in probabilistic sequence learning. In Jiménez, L. (Ed.), Attention and implicit learning (pp. 43–67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Johnson, J., Prior, S., & Artuso, M. (2000). Field dependence as a factor in second language communicative production. Language Learning, 50, 529–567.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2004). LISREL 8.7 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jimenez, L., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321–340.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Kuntsi, J., Eley, T., Taylor, A., Hughes, C., Asherson, P., Caspi, A., et al. (2004). Co-occurrence of ADHD and low IQ has genetic origins. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 124, 41–47.
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365.
Lieberman, M. D. (2003). Reflective and reflexive judgment processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. In Forgas, J. P., Williams, K. R., & von Hippel, W. (Eds.), Social judgments: Implicit and explicit processes (pp. 44–67). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Linck, J., Hughes, M., Campbell, S., Silbert, N., Tare, M., Jackson, S., et al. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63, 530–566.
Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA language aptitude tests. Swansea: Lognostics.
Misyak, J., & Christiansen, M. (2012). Statistical learning and language: An individual differences study. Language Learning, 62, 302–331.
Myers, I., McCaulley, M., Quenk, N., & Hammer, A. (1998). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers–Briggs type indicator (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Osman, M. (2004). An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 988–1010.
Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 972–987.
Pimsleur, P. (1966). Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery (PLAB). New York: Psychological Corporation.
Pretz, J., Totz, K., & Kaufman, S. (2010). The effects of mood, cognitive style, and cognitive ability on implicit learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 215–219.
Reber, A., Walkenfeld, F., & Hernstadt, R. (1991). Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 888–896.
Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rebuschat, P. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning, 63, 595–626.
Reed, J., & Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 585–594.
Robinson, P. (1997). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47, 45–99.
Robinson, P. (2002). Individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory during adult incidental second language learning: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfeld, and Hernstadt (1991). In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211–266). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Scovel, T. (2001). Learning new languages: A guide to second language acquisition. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Shamosh, N., DeYoung, C., Green, A., Reis, D., Johnson, M., Conway, A., et al. (2008). Individual differences in delay discounting: Relation to intelligence, working memory, and anterior prefrontal cortex. Psychological Science, 19, 904–911.
Shamosh, N., & Gray, J. (2007). Delay discounting and intelligence: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 36, 289–305.
Sheen, Y. (2007a). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255–283.
Sheen, Y. (2007b). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–322). New York: Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P. (1986). Cluster analysis and the identification of learner types. In Cook, V. (Ed.), Experimental approaches to second language learning (pp. 81–94). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Arnold.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to learning language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–665.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? American Psychologist, 52, 700–712.
Tomblin, J., Mainela-Arnold, E., & Zhang, X. (2007). Procedural learning in adolescents with and without specific language impairment. Language Learning and Development, 3, 269–293.
Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 144–171). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ullman, M. T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 37–69.
Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270.
VanPatten, B., Collopy, E., Price, J. E., Borst, S., & Qualin, A. (2013). Explicit information, grammatical sensitivity, and the first-noun principle: A cross-linguistic study in processing instruction. Modern Language Journal, 97, 506–527.
Williams, J. N. (1999). Memory, attention, and inductive learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 1–48.
Witkin, H. (1962). Psychological differentiation: Studies of development. New York: Wiley.
Witteman, C., van den Bercken, J., Claes, L., & Godoy, A. (2009). Assessing rational and intuitive thinking styles. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 39–47.
Woltz, D. J. (2003). Implicit cognitive processes as aptitudes for learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 95–104.
Woolhouse, L., & Bayne, R. (2000). Personality and the use of intuition: Individual differences in strategy and performance on an implicit learning task. European Journal of Personality, 14, 157–169.
Yilmaz, Y. (2013). Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34, 344–368.