Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:40:55.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The declarative/procedural model and the shallow structure hypothesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2006

Michael T. Ullman
Michael T. Ullman
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Clahsen and Felser (CF) have written a beautiful and important paper. I applaud their integrative empirical approach, and believe that their theoretical account is largely correct, if not in some of its specific claims, at least in its broader assumptions. CF directly compare their shallow structure hypothesis (SSH) with a model that my colleagues and I have proposed for aspects of the neurocognition of first and second language: the “declarative/procedural” (DP) model. Although some of CF's discussion accurately depicts the DP model and its relation to the data, they also make a few critical errors.Here, I first summarize the DP model in both first language (L1) and adult-learned second language (L2), in order to be able to contrast it with the SSH, and then address the relevant problems in CF. For further details on the DP model and L1, see Ullman (2001a, 2001c, 2004) and Ullman et al. (1997). For the model as it applies to L2, see Ullman (2001b, 2005).

Type
Commentaries
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 2006 , pp. 97 - 105
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birdsong D., & Flege J. E. 2001. Regular-irregular dissociations in the acquisition of English as a second language. In BUCLD 25: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 123– 132). Boston: Cascadilla Press.
Brovetto C., & Ullman M. T. 2001, March. First vs. second language: A differential reliance on grammatical computations and lexical memory. Paper presented at the CUNY 2001 Conference on Sentence Processing, Philadelphia, PA.
Buckner R. L., & Wheeler M. E. 2001. The cognitive neuroscience of remembering. Nature Review Neuroscience, 2, 624– 634.Google Scholar
Calabresi P., Centonze D., Gubellini P., Pisani A., & Bernardi G. 2000. Acetylcholine-mediated modulation of striatal function. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 120– 126.Google Scholar
Chee M. W., Caplan D., Soon C. S., Sriram N., Tan E. W., Thiel T., et al. 1999. Processing of visually presented sentences in Mandarin and English studied with fMRI. Neuron, 23, 127– 137.Google Scholar
Chee M. W., Hon N., Lee H. L., & Soon C. S. 2001. Relative language proficiency modulates BOLD signal change when bilinguals perform semantic judgments. Neuroimage, 13, 1155– 1163.Google Scholar
Chee M. W., Tan E. W., & Thiel T. 1999. Mandarin and English single word processing studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 3050– 3056.Google Scholar
Chun M. M. 2000. Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 170– 178.Google Scholar
De Bleser R., Dupont P., Postler J., Bormans G., Spellman D., Mortelmans L., et al. 2003. The organization of the bilingual lexicon: A PET study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 439– 456.Google Scholar
Dehaene S., Dupoux E., Mehler J., Cohen L., Paulesu E., Perani D., et al. 1997. Anatomical variability in the cortical representation of first and second language. NeuroReport, 8, 3809– 3815.Google Scholar
Di Giulio D. V., Seidenberg M., O'Leary D. S., & Raz N. 1994. Procedural and declarative memory: A developmental study. Brain and Cognition, 25, 79– 91.Google Scholar
Eichenbaum H., & Cohen N. J. 2001. From conditioning to conscious recollection: Memory systems of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fabbro F. 1999. The neurolinguistics of bilingualism. Hove: Psychology Press.
Fabbro F., & Paradis M. 1995. Differential impairments in four multilingual patients with subcortical lesions. In M. Paradis (Ed.), Aspects of bilingual aphasia (Vol. 3, pp. 139– 176). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Fillmore C. J., Kay P., & O'Connor C. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of Let Alone. Language, 64, 501– 538.Google Scholar
Fredriksson A. 2000. Maze learning and motor activity deficits in adult mice induced by iron exposure during a critical postnatal period. Developmental Brain Research, 119, 65– 74.Google Scholar
Friederici A. D., Steinhauer K., & Pfeifer E. 2002. Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 529– 534.Google Scholar
Hahne A. 2001. What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 251– 266.Google Scholar
Hahne A., & Friederici A. D. 2001. Processing a second language: Late learners' comprehension strategies as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 123– 141.Google Scholar
Hahne A., Muller J., & Clahsen H. 2003. Second language learners' processing of inflected words: Behavioral and ERP evidence for storage and decomposition. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 45, 1– 42.Google Scholar
Harrington D. L., Haaland K. Y., Yeo R. A., & Marder E. 1990. Procedural memory in Parkinson's disease: Impaired motor but not visuoperceptual learning. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 12, 323– 339.Google Scholar
Hodges J. R., & Patterson K. 1997. Semantic memory disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 68– 72.Google Scholar
Illes J., Francis W. S., Desmond J. E., Gabrieli J. D., Glover G. H., Poldrack R., et al. 1999. Convergent cortical representation of semantic processing in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 70, 347– 363.Google Scholar
Klein D., Milner B., Zatorre R. J., Meyer E., & Evans A. C. 1995. The neural substrates underlying word generation: A bilingual functional-imaging study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 92, 2899– 2903.Google Scholar
Klein D., Milner B., Zatorre R. J., Zhao V., & Nikelski J. 1999. Cerebral organization in bilinguals: A PET study of Chinese–English verb generation. NeuroReport, 10, 2841– 2846.Google Scholar
Klein D., Zatorre R. J., Milner B., Meyer E., & Evans A. C. 1994. Left putaminal activation when speaking a second language: Evidence from PET. NeuroReport, 5, 2295– 2297.Google Scholar
Martin A., Ungerleider L. G., & Haxby J. V. 2000. Category specificity and the brain: the sensory/motor model of semantic representations of objects. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1023– 1036). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McLaughlin J., Osterhout L., & Kim A. 2004. Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 703– 704.Google Scholar
Mishkin M., Malamut B., & Bachevalier J. 1984. Memories and habits: Two neural systems. In G. Lynch, J. L. McGaugh, & N. W. Weinburger (Eds.), Neurobiology of learning and memory (pp. 65– 77). New York: Guilford Press.
Nakahara H., Doya K., & Hikosaka O. 2001. Parallel cortico-basal ganglia mechanisms for acquisition and execution of visuomotor sequences—A computational approach. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 626– 647.Google Scholar
Opitz B., & Friederici A. D. 2003. Interactions of the hippocampal system and the prefrontal cortex in learning language-like rules. NeuroImage, 19, 1730– 1737.Google Scholar
Osterhout L., & McLaughlin J. 2000. What brain activity can tell us about second-language learning. Paper presented at the 13th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.
Packard M. G. 1998. Posttraining estrogen and memory modulation. Hormones and Behavior, 34, 126– 139.Google Scholar
Packard M. G., & Knowlton B. J. 2002. Learning and memory functions of the basal ganglia. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 563– 593.Google Scholar
Paradis M. 1994. Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 393– 419). London: Academic Press.
Paradis M. 1995. Introduction: The need for distinctions. In M. Paradis (Ed.), Aspects of bilingual aphasia (Vol. 3, pp. 1– 9). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Paradis M. 1999, August 4. Neuroimaging studies of the bilingual brain: Some words of caution. Paper presented at the 25th Lacus Forum, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
Paradis M. 2004. A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Perani D., Dehaene S., Grassi F., Cohen L., Cappa S. F., Dupoux E., et al. 1996. Brain processing of native and foreign languages. NeuroReport, 7, 2439– 2444.Google Scholar
Perani D., Paulesu E., Galles N. S., Dupoux E., Dehaene S., Bettinardi V., et al. 1998. The bilingual brain. Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language. Brain, 121, 1841– 1852.Google Scholar
Pillai J. J., Araque J. M., Allison J. D., Suthuraman S., Loring D. W., Thiruvaiy D., et al. 2003. Functional MRI study of semantic and phonological language processing in bilingual subjects preliminary findings. NeuroImage, 19, 565– 576.Google Scholar
Poldrack R., & Packard M. G. 2003. Competition among multiple memory systems: Converging evidence from animal and human brain studies. Neuropsychologia, 41, 245– 251.Google Scholar
Schacter D. L., & Tulving E. (Eds.). 1994. Memory systems 1994. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sherwin B. B. 1988. Estrogen and/or androgen replacement therapy and cognitive functioning in surgically menopausal women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 13, 345– 357.Google Scholar
Siegler R. S. (Ed.). 1978. Children's thinking: What develops? Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Squire L. R., & Knowlton B. J. 2000. The medial temporal lobe, the hippocampus, and the memory systems of the brain. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 765– 780). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Squire L. R., & Zola S. M. 1996. Structure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 93, 13515– 13522.Google Scholar
Ullman M. T. 2001a. The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 37– 69.Google Scholar
Ullman M. T. 2001b. The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 105– 122.Google Scholar
Ullman M. T. 2001c. A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 717– 726.Google Scholar
Ullman M. T. 2004. Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231– 270.Google Scholar
Ullman M. T. 2005. A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition (pp. 141– 178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Ullman M. T. (in press). Is Broca's area part of a basal ganglia thalamocortical circuit? Cortex.
Ullman M. T., Corkin S., Coppola M., Hickok G., Growdon J. H., Koroshetz W. J., et al. 1997. A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 266– 276.Google Scholar
Weber-Fox C. M., & Neville H. J. 1996. Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 231– 256.Google Scholar
Willingham D. B. 1998. A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 105, 558– 584.Google Scholar
Wolansky M. J., Cabrera R. J., Ibarra G. R., Mongiat L., & Azcurra J. M. 1999. Exogenous NGF alters a critical motor period in rat striatum. NeuroReport, 10, 2705– 2709.Google Scholar