Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T02:41:59.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Detection of mispronunciations: A comparison of adults, normal-speaking children, and children with articulation errors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

John E. Bernthal ,
Mel Greenlee ,
Roy Eblen  and
Kim Marking
John E. Bernthal*
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Mel Greenlee
Affiliation:
Stanford University & University of California, Berkeley
Roy Eblen
Affiliation:
University of Northern Iowa
Kim Marking
Affiliation:
Northern Trails Area Education Agency #2, Clear Lake, Iowa
*
John Bernthal, 301 Barkley Center, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0738
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that children as well as adults can detect mispronounced words presented in running speech contexts. Listeners' detections are influenced by both phonological and lexical characteristics of the mispronounced words. The present study compared the performance of normal-speaking children, misarticulating children, and adults on a task which required the detection of mispronounced words. Phonological shifts presented in the stimuli represented both developmental and nondevelopmental patterns. Analysis of errors in detecting these mispronunciations indicated that adults were significantly more accurate than either group of children. In contrast, the performance of the two groups of children was relatively similar. Both children and adults more readily detected mispronunciations patterned after developmental errors than those mispronunciations manifesting more unusual, nondevelopmental sound shifts. Individual mispronounced words varied widely in their detectability. Nevertheless, those words which children found most difficult were also those on which adults most often erred. Parallels observed between the performance of the misarticulating children and their normally developing peers indicate that both younger groups use linguistic knowledge in a similar way in the perception of others' fluent speech.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 1987 , pp. 209 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American National Standards Institute (ANSI). (1970). American National Standard specifications for audiometers. New York: ANSI.Google Scholar
Bagley, W. C. (1900). The apperception of the spoken sentence: A study in the psychology of language. American Journal of Psychology, 12, 80–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, D. B. (1976). The role of perception in the acquisition of phonology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P. (1953). Non-normality and tests on variance. Biometrika, 40, 318–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broen, P., & Jons, S. A. (1979). The production and perception of speech by a misarticulating child. In Pick, H., Stevenson, H., Steinschneider, A., Singer, J., & Leibowitz, H. (Eds.), Psychology: From theory to practice. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Chaney, C. F. (1978). Production and identification of |j w r l| in normal and articulation impaired children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
Clinch, J. F., & Keselman, H. J. (1982). Parametric alternatives to the analysis of variance. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clumeck, H. (1982). The effects of word-familiarity on phoneme recognition in children aged three to five years. In Johnson, C. & Thew, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Congress for the Study of Child Language. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Cole, R. A. (1973). Listening for mispronunciations: A measure of what we hear during speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, R. A. (1981). Perception of fluent speech by children and adults. In Winitz, H. (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition (pp. 92–109). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Cole, R. A., & Jakimik, J. (1978). Understanding speech: How words are heard. In Underwood, G. (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 67–116). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Cole, R. A., Jakimik, J. & Cooper, W. E. (1978). Perceptibility of phonetic features in fluent speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 44–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, R. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1980). Listening for mispronunciations in a children's story: The use of context by children and adults. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunwell, P. (1981). The development of phonology. First Language, 2, 161–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulick, M., Wiedmer, B. & Kuhl, P. (1979, November). Children's detection of mispronounced words influent speech. Paper presented to the Acoustical Society of America,Salt Lake City, UT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1979). The child's processing of phonology. In Collins, W. A. (Ed.), The Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 83–119). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1980). The inference of speech perception in the phonologically disordered child: Part II. Some clinically novel procedures, their use, some findings. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 45, 445–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinsland, H. (1945). A basic vocabulary of elementary school children. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schuckers, G. H., & Lefkov, C. S. (1979). Children's perception of misarticulations in contextual speech. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Templin, M., & Darley, F. (1960). The Templin Darley Tests of Articulation (2nd ed.). Iowa City: University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Wang, M. D., & Bilger, R. C. (1973). Consonant confusions in noise: A study of perceptual features. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 1248–1266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed