Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French

  • LYNNE G. DUNCAN (a1), SÉVERINE CASALIS (a2) and PASCALE COLÉ (a3)

Abstract

This cross-linguistic comparison of metalinguistic development in French and English examines early ability to manipulate derivational suffixes in oral language games as a function of chronological age, receptive vocabulary, and year of schooling. Data from judgment and production tasks are presented for children aged between 5 and 8 years in their first, second, or third school year in the United Kingdom and France. The results suggest that metamorphological development is accelerated in French relative to English. The French advantage encompasses knowledge of a broader range of suffixes and a markedly greater facility for generalizing morphological knowledge to novel contexts. These findings are interpreted in relation to the word formation systems of English and French, and the educational context in each country.

Copyright

Corresponding author

ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Lynne G. Duncan, School of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland, UK. E-mail: l.g.duncan@dundee.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society of Research in Child Development, 58(Serial No. 238, No. 10), 1166.
Bauer, L. (2003). English prefixation—A typological shift? Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 50, 3340.
Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150177.
Bishop, D. V. M. (1997). Uncommon understanding: Development and disorders of language comprehension in children. Hove: Psychology Press.
Browne, D. (1997). Putting knowledge to work. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 353354.
Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In Feldman, L. B. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12, 169190.
Carlisle, J. F., & Nomanbhoy, D. M. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in 1 st-graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177195.
Carlisle, J. F., Stone, C. A., & Katz, L. A. (2001). The effects of phonological transparency on reading derived words. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 249274.
Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2009). On the relationship between morphological and phonological awareness: Effects of training in kindergarten and in first grade reading. First Language, 29, 113142.
Casalis, S., Colé, P., & Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 114138.
Casalis, S., & Louis-Alexandre, M.-F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 12, 303335.
Clark, E. V. (1978). Awareness of language: Some evidence from what children say and do. In Sinclair, A., Jarvella, R., & Levelt, W. J. M. (Eds.), The child's conception of language (pp. 1743). New York: Springer–Verlag.
Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, E. V., & Cohen, S. R. (1984). Productivity and memory for newly formed words. Journal of Child Language, 11, 611625.
Clark, E. V., & Hecht, B. F. (1982). Learning to coin agent and instrument nouns. Cognition, 12, 124.
Colé, P., Royer, C., Leuwers, C., & Casalis, S. (2004). Derivational knowledge and reading acquisition for French beginning-readers from Grade 1 to Grade 3. Année Psychologique, 104, 701750.
Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cutler, A., & Clifton, C. (1984). The use of prosodic information in word recognition. In Bouma, H. & Bouwhuis, D. G. (Eds.), Attention and performance: Vol. 10. Control of language processes (pp. 183196). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 5162.
Deacon, S. H., & Bryant, P. (2005). What young children do and do not know about the spelling of inflections and derivations. Developmental Science, 8, 583594.
Delattre, P. (1965). Comparing the phonetic features of English, French, German and Spanish: An interim report. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.
Dell, G. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283321.
Derwing, B. L. (1976). Morpheme recognition and the learning of rules for derivational morphology. Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 21, 3866.
Derwing, B. L., & Baker, W. J. (1979). Recent research on the acquisition of English morphology. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (Eds.), Language acquisition (pp. 209223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duncan, L. G., Colé, P., Seymour, P. H. K., & Magnan, A. (2006). Differing sequences of metaphonological development in French and English. Journal of Child Language, 33, 369399.
Duncan, L. G., Seymour, P. H. K., & Hill, S. (1997). How important are rhyme and analogy in beginning reading? Cognition, 63, 171208.
Duncan, L. G., Seymour, P. H. K., & Hill, S. (2000). A small to large unit progression in metaphonological awareness and reading? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 10811104.
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Pintillie, D. (1982). British Picture Vocabulary Scale (BPVS). Windsor: NFER–Nelson.
Dunn, L. M., Thériault-Whalen, C. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Échelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody (EVIP). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Elliot, C., Murray, D., & Pearson, L. (1983). British Abilities Scales, manual 4. Windsor: NFER–Nelson.
Finkenstaedt, T., & Wolff, D. (1973). Ordered profusion: Studies in dictionaries and the English lexicon. Heidelberg: Winter.
Freyd, P., & Baron, J. (1982). Individual-differences in acquisition of derivational morphology. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 282295.
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2003). A supralexical model for French derivational morphology. In Assink, E. M. H. & Sandra, D. (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 139157). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S. (2007). Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 323345.
Goswami, U., & East, M. (2000). Rhyme and analogy in beginning reading: Conceptual and methodological issues. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 6393.
Hay, J. B., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 342348.
Jaffré, J.-P. (2006). Orthographes et litéracies: Les particularités du Français. Les Cahiers du CENTAL, 1, 5159.
Jarmulowicz, L. D. (2002). English derivational suffix frequency and children's stress judgments. Brain and Language, 81, 192204.
Jarmulowicz, L. (2006). School-aged children's phonological production of derived English words. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 294308.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1986). From meta-processes to conscious access—Evidence from children's metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition, 23, 95147.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1997). Promissory notes, genetic clocks, and epigenetic outcomes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 355360.
Lefavrais, P. (1963). Du diagnostic de la dyslexie á l'étude clinique de la lecture. Un nouvel instrument: Le test “l'Alouette.” Revue de Psychologie Appliquée, 13, 189207.
Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary-school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 156166.
Lewis, D. J., & Windsor, J. (1996). Children's analysis of derivational suffix meanings. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 209216.
Longtin, C. M., Seguí, J., & Halle, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313334.
Mahony, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing, 12, 191218.
Mann, V., & Singson, M. (2003). Linking morphological knowledge to English decoding ability: Large effects of little suffixes. In Assink, E. M. H. & Sandra, D. (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 125). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
Manza, L., & Reber, A. S. (1997). Representing artificial grammar: Transfer across stimulus forms and modalities. In Berry, D. C. (Ed.), How implicit is implicit learning? (pp. 73106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Melinger, A. (2003). Morphological structure in the lexical representation of prefixed words: Evidence from speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 335362.
Moats, L. C. (2000). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Nagy, W., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134147.
Pacton, S., Fayol, M., & Perruchet, P. (2005). Children's implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities. Child Development, 76, 324339.
Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 401426.
Pillon, A. (1998). Morpheme units in speech production: Evidence from laboratory-induced verbal slips. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 465498.
Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1990). The use of rhythm in attending to speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 564573.
Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 342364.
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 10901098.
Seidenberg, M. S., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 353361.
Seidler, S. (1988). Untersuchung zum Erwerb von Wortbildungsregeln Deverbativa Nomina (Agens und Instrument) im Französischen. Unpublished MA thesis, Universität Hamburg.
Sénéchal, M., & Kearnan, K. (2007). The role of morphology in reading and spelling. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 35, 297325.
Stuart, M., Dixon, M., Masterson, J., & Gray, B. (2003). Children's early reading vocabulary: Description and word frequency lists. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 585598.
Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing, 12, 219252.
Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271294.
Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 649667.
Ullman, M. T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 3769.
Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231270.
Valtin, R. (1984). The development of metalinguistic abilities in children learning to read and write. In Downing, J. & Valtin, R. (Eds.), Language awareness and learning to read (pp. 207226). New York: Springer–Verlag.
Vihman, M. M., Nakai, S., DePaolis, R. A., & Halle, P. (2004). The role of accentual pattern in early lexical representation. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 336353.
Windsor, J. (1994). Children's comprehension and production of derivational suffixes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 409417.
Zhang, J., Anderson, R. C., Packard, J., Wu, X., & Tang, S. (2009). Development of knowledge about compound word structures in Chinese and English. Unpublished manuscript.

Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French

  • LYNNE G. DUNCAN (a1), SÉVERINE CASALIS (a2) and PASCALE COLÉ (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed