Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wxk4p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T11:47:34.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How do you like your doughnuts?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2006

Nigel Duffield
Nigel Duffield
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ever since the derivational theory of complexity (DTC) apparently bit the dust in the late 1960s, experimental psycholinguistics have been afflicted by a dualism at least as troublesome as the mind/brain dichotomy, namely, the grammar/parser distinction. The idea that mentally represented grammar is something fully dissociated from the human language processor is less than compelling, yet it has implicitly informed much of the last half century's psycholinguistics practice on both sides of the formalist–functionalist divide.

Information

Type
Commentaries
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 2006 , pp. 56 - 59
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Berwick R. C. 1991. Principles of principle-based parsing. In R. C. Berwick, S. P. Abney, & C. Tenny (Eds.), Principle-based parsing: Computation and psycholinguistics (pp. 1– 38). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Crocker M. 1994. On the nature of the principle-based language processor. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Raynor (Eds.), Perspectives on language processing (pp. 245– 266). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Culicover P. 1998. The minimalist impulse. In P. W. Culicover & L. McNally (Eds.), The limits of syntax (pp. 44– 77). New York: Academic Press.
Culicover P. 2000. Minimalist architectures [review of Jackendoff 1997]. Journal of Linguistics, 35, 137– 150.Google Scholar
Duffield N. 2003. Measures of competent gradience. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken, & R. Towell (Eds.), The Lexicon–syntax interface in second language acquisition (pp. 97– 127). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Duffield N. 2005. Implications of competent gradience. Moderne Sprachen, 45, 95– 117.Google Scholar
Frazier L. 1987. Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance: Vol. XII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Marslen-Wilson W., & Tyler L. K. 1980. The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1– 71.Google Scholar
Prideaux G. 1985. Psycholinguistics: The experimental study of language. New York: Guilford Press.
Pritchett B. 1988. Garden Path phenomena and the grammatical basis of language processing. Language, 64, 539– 576.Google Scholar
Seidenberg M. S., & MacDonald M.-E. C. 1999. A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing. Cognitive Science, 23, 569– 588.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus M. 1986. Psycholinguistics: An overview I. In F. Newmeyer (Ed.), The Cambridge survey of linguistics: Vol. IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Townsend D. J., & Bever T. G. 2001. Sentence comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tyler L. K. 1992. Spoken language comprehension: An experimental approach to disordered and normal comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.