Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-g5lq8 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-11-03T07:26:03.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How language environment, age, and cognitive capacity support the bilingual development of Syrian refugee children recently arrived in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2020

Johanne Paradis Open the ORCID record for Johanne Paradis [Opens in a new window] ,
Adriana Soto-Corominas Open the ORCID record for Adriana Soto-Corominas [Opens in a new window] ,
Xi Chen  and
Alexandra Gottardo
Johanne Paradis*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Adriana Soto-Corominas
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Xi Chen
Affiliation:
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto
Alexandra Gottardo
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail johanne.paradis@ualberta.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on the bilingual development of refugee children is limited, despite this group having distinct characteristics and migration experiences that could impact language development. This study examined the role of language environment factors, alongside age and cognitive factors, in shaping the Arabic as a first/heritage language and English as a second language of recently arrived Syrian refugee children in Canada (N = 133; mean age = 9 years old; mean family residency = 23 months). We found that Arabic was the primary home language with some English use among siblings. Children did not engage frequently in language-rich activities in either language, especially not literacy activities in Arabic. Parent education levels were low: most had primary school only. Hierarchical regression models revealed that stronger nonverbal reasoning skills, more exposure to English at school, more sibling interaction in English, more frequent engagement in language-rich activities in English, and higher maternal and paternal education were associated with larger English vocabularies and greater accuracy with verb morphology. Arabic vocabulary and morphological abilities were predicted by older age (i.e., more first/heritage language exposure), stronger nonverbal reasoning skills and maternal education. We conclude that proximal environment factors, like language use at home and richness, accounted for more variance in the second language than the first/heritage language, but parent factors accounted for variance in both languages.

Keywords

bilingual developmentchild second language acquisitionindividual differencesinput factorsrefugee children and youth

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 41 , Special Issue 6: The Language, Literacy and Social Integration of Refugee Children and Youth , November 2020 , pp. 1255 - 1281
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Albirini, A. (2014). Toward understanding the variability in the language proficiencies of Arabic heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18, 730–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, C., Burstein Feldman, Z., Yitzhaki, D., Armon Lotem, S., & Walters, J. (2014). Family language policies, reported language use and proficiency in Russian–Hebrew bilingual children in Israel. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 35, 216–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assadi, I., Shany, M., Ibrahim, R., Khateb, A., & Ben Simone, A. (2015). The Arabic Language Assessment Battery. Tel Aviv: Yessod.Google Scholar
Barton, K., & Barton, M. K. (2015). Package “MuMIn.” Version 1, 18. Available from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/MuMIn.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayram, F., Rothman, J., Iverson, M., Kupisch, T., Miller, D., Puig-Mayenco, E., & Westergaard, M. (2017). Differences in use without deficiencies in competence: Passives in the Turkish and German of Turkish heritage speakers in Germany. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22, 19–39.Google Scholar
Bridges, K., & Hoff, E. (2014). Older sibling influences on the language environment and language development of toddlers in bilingual homes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 225–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chondrogianni, V., & Marinis, T. (2011). Differential effects of internal and external factors on the development of vocabulary, tense morphology and morpho-syntax in successive bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 318–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, P. J., Snowling, M. J., Truelove, E., & Hulme, C. (2010). Ameliorating children’s reading-comprehension difficulties: A randomized controlled trial. Psychological Science, 21, 1106–1116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). PPVT-4: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
Extra, G., & Yagmur, K. (2010). Language proficiency and socio-cultural orientation of Turkish and Moroccan youngsters in the Netherlands. Language and Education, 24, 117–132.Google Scholar
Flores, C., Santos, A. L., Jesus, A., & Marques, R. (2017). Age and input effects in the acquisition of mood in heritage Portuguese. Journal of Child Language, 44, 795–828. doi: 10.1017/S0305000916000222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golberg, H., Paradis, J., & Crago, M. (2008). Lexical acquisition over time in minority L1 children learning English as a L2. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govindarajan, K., & Paradis, J. (2019). Narrative abilities of bilingual children with and without Developmental Language Disorder (SLI): Differentiation and the role of age and input factors. Journal of Communication Disorders, 77, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadfield, K., Ostrowski, A., & Ungar, M. (2017). What can we expect of the mental health and well-being of Syrian refugee children and adolescents in Canada? Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 58, 194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, C. S., Komaroff, E., Rodriguez, B. L., Lopez, L. M., Scarpino, S. E., & Goldstein, B. (2012). Predicting Spanish–English bilingual children’s language abilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 1251–1264.Google ScholarPubMed
Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 26, 55–88. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2005.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (2018). Syrian Refugees Family Composition—Ad hoc datasets. Retrieved on March 12, 2019, from https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/ca243c40-a6d3-4a46-a578-b4fad4369df0Google Scholar
Jia, G. (2008). Heritage language development, maintenance, and attrition among recent Chinese immigrants in New York City. In He, A. W. & Xiao, Y. (Eds.), Chinese as a heritage language (pp. 189–203). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center/University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Jia, G., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 131–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, G., & Fuse, A. (2007). Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by native Mandarin-speaking children and adolescents: Age-related differences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1280–1299.Google ScholarPubMed
Jia, R., & Paradis, J. (2015). The use of referring expressions in narratives by Mandarin heritage language children and the role of language environment factors in predicting individual differences. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 737–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, R., & Paradis, J. (2018). The acquisition of Mandarin relative clauses by Mandarin heritage language children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. Advance online publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaltsa, M., Prentza, A., & Tsimpli, I. M. (2019). Input and literacy effects in simultaneous and sequential bilinguals: The performance of Albanian–Greek-speaking children in sentence repetition. International Journal of Bilingualism. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1367006918819867Google Scholar
Kanu, Y. (2008). Educational needs and barriers for African refugee students in manitoba. Canadian Journal of Education, 31, 915–940.Google Scholar
Korntheuer, A., Maehler, D., & Pritchard, P. (2017). The Canadian and German contexts for refugee integration. In A. Korntheuer, P. Pritchard, & D. Maehler (Eds.), Structural scontext of refugee integration in Canada and Germany. (GESIS-Schriftenreihe, 15). Köln: GESIS—Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Available from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-52101-0Google Scholar
MacNevin, J. (2012). Learning the way: Teaching and learning with and for youth from fefugee backgrounds on Prince Edward Island. Canadian Journal of Education, 35, 48–63.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2016). The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naglieri, J. A. (1985). Matrix Analogies Test: Short Form (MAT-SF). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Promoting the educational success of children and youth learning English: Promising futures. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Oh, J. S., & Fuligni, A. J. (2010). The role of heritage language development in the ethnic identity and family relationships of adolescents from immigrant backgrounds. Social Development, 19, 202–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, K. D., & Eilers, R. (2002). Language and literacy in bilingual children. Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Rusk, B., Sorenson Duncan, T., & Govindarajan, K. (2017). Children’s second language acquisition of English complex syntax: The role of age, input and cognitive factors. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 1– 20. doi: 10.1017/S0267190517000022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pham, G., & Tipton, T. (2018). Internal and external factors that support children’s minority first language and English. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49, 595–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Place, S., & Hoff, E. (2016). Effects and noneffects of input in bilingual environments on dual language skills in 2 ½-year-olds. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 1023–1041.Google Scholar
Prevoo, M. J., Malda, M., Mesman, J., Emmen, R. A., Yeniad, N., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Linting, M. (2014). Predicting ethnic minority children’s vocabulary from socioeconomic status, maternal language and home reading input: Different pathways for host and ethnic language. Journal of Child Language, 41, 963–984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, M., & Wexler, K. (2001). Rice Wexler Test of Early Grammatical Impairment. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Rojas, R., Iglesias, A., Bunta, F., Goldstein, B., Goldenberg, C., & Reese, L. (2016). Interlocutor differential effects on the expressive language skills of Spanish-speaking English learners. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 166–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothman, J., Long, D., Iverson, M., Judy, T., Lingwall, A., & Chakravarty, T. (2016). Older age of onset in child L2 acquisition can be facilitative: Evidence from the acquisition of English passives by Spanish natives. Journal of Child Language, 43, 662–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorenson Duncan, T., & Paradis, J. (2020a). How does maternal education influence the linguistic environment supporting bilingual language development in child L2 learners of English? International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(1), 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorenson Duncan, T., & Paradis, J. (2020b). Home language environment and children’s second language acquisition: The special status of input from older siblings. Journal of Child Language, p. 1–24. doi: 10.1017/S0305000919000977Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. (2019). Results from the 2016 Census: Syrian refugees who resettled in Canada in 2015 and 2016. Catalogue no. 75-006-X. Retrieved on March 12, 2019, from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/75-006-X201900100001Google Scholar
Tibi, S. (2016). Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading Arabic: The role of morphological awareness in reading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University, Canada.Google Scholar
Tseng, V., & Fuligni, A. J. (2000). Parent–adolescent language use and relationships among immigrant families with East Asian, Filipino, and Latin American backgrounds. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S., Argyri, F., Cornips, L., Hulk, A., Sorace, A., & Tsimpli, I. (2014). On the role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 765–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteside, K. E., Gooch, D., & Norbury, C. F. (2017). English language proficiency and early school attainment among children learning English as an additional language. Child Development, 88, 812–827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Paradis et al. supplementary material

Paradis et al. supplementary material

Download Paradis et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 210.3 KB