Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T18:15:37.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of first language background and visual information on the effectiveness of low-variability input

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2014

ANGELICA FULGA  and
KIM McDONOUGH
ANGELICA FULGA*
Affiliation:
Yıldız Technical University
KIM McDONOUGH
Affiliation:
Concordia University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Angelica Fulga, Yıldız Technical University, Davutpasa Campus 34200, Esenler, Istanbul, Turkey. E-mail: angelicafulga@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigated whether first language (L1) background and visual information impact the effectiveness of skewed and balanced input at promoting pattern detection. Participants (N = 84) were exposed to Esperanto sentences with the transitive construction under skewed (one noun with high token frequency) or balanced (equal token frequency) input conditions while viewing either color or black-and-white visuals. Their ability to detect the relevant morphological and syntactic features of the transitive construction was tested through a forced-judgment task using novel nouns. The results indicated no significant main effect for visual information or input type. There was, however, a significant main effect for L1 on learners’ detection of the novel pattern. Implications are discussed in terms of the potential effect of L1-specific transitive encodings on second language speakers’ ability to abstract novel patterns.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 265 - 283
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 21, 435–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altarriba, J., & Knickerbocker, H. (2011). Acquiring second language vocabulary through the use of images and words. In Trofimovich, P. & McDonough, K. (Eds.), Applying priming methods to L2 learning, teaching and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bornkessel, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2006). The extended argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychological Review, 113, 787–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, J. K., & Goldberg, A. E. (2011). Young children fail to fully generalize a novel argument structure construction when exposed to the same input as older learners. Journal of Child Language, 39, 457–481. doi: 10.1017/S0305000911000079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. J., Tomasello, M., Dodson, K., & Lewis, L. B. (1999). Young children's overgeneralizations with fixed transitive verbs. Child Development, 70, 1325–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cano, M. E., Class, Q. A., & Polich, J. (2009). Active valence, stimulus attributes, and P300: Colour vs. black/white and normal vs. scrambled images. International Journal of Psychology, 71, 17–24.Google Scholar
Casenhiser, D., & Goldberg, A. E. (2005). Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science, 8, 500–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, G. (2011). The international auxiliary language Esperanto grammar and commentary (4th ed.). London: British Esperanto Association Incorporated. Retrieved from http://www.archive.org/stream/theinternational35815gut/35815-0.txtGoogle Scholar
Deno, S. L. (1968). Effects of words and pictures as stimuli in learning language equivalents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 202–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, F. M. (1971). Colour as an instructional variable. AV Communication Review, 19, 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulga, A. (2013). The impact of L1 background and visual information on low-variability input. Unpublished master's thesis. Concordia University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2009). The nature of generalization in language. Cognitive Linguistics, 20, 93–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., & Casenhiser, D. (2008). Construction learning and second language acquisition. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 197–215). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A., Casenhiser, D., & White, T. (2007). Constructions as categories of language. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structures generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, D. (1995). The sixteen rules of Esperanto grammar. Retrieved from http://donh.best.vwh.net/Esperanto/rules.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hocking, J., & Price, C. J. (2008). The influence of colour and sound on neuronal activation during visual object naming. Brain Research, 1241, 92–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidd, E., Lieven, E. V. M., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Examining the role of lexical frequency in children's acquisition of sentential complements. Cognitive Development, 21, 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krajewski, G., Siebenborn, A.-K., & Lieven, E. V. M. (2011). The shape of frequency distribution and novel construction learning. Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston. Retrieved from http://amlap2011.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/165_pdf.pdfGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2005). The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. Cognitive Development, 20, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Nekrasova-Becker, T. (2014). Comparing the effect of skewed and balanced input on English as a foreign language learners’ comprehension of the double-object dative construction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 419–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2013). Learning a novel pattern through balanced and skewed input. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 654–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Næss, Å. (2007). Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, D. (2012). Input skewedness, consistency, and order of frequent verbs in frequency-driven second language construction learning: A replication and extension of Casenhiser and Goldberg (2005) to adult second language acquisition. IRAL, 50, 31–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaari, A. J. (1998). The interactive effects of color realism, clustering, and age on pictorial recall memory among students in Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Digital Library and Archives (etd-32698-18340).Google Scholar
Sinnemäki, K. (2014). A typological perspective on differential object marking. Linguistics, 52, 281–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Travers, R. M. W. (1964). The transmission of information to human receivers. AV Communication Review, 4, 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, N. E. (1978). Pictures and words as stimuli in learning foreign language responses. Journal of Psychology, 98, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, F. A., Sharpe, T. L., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2002). The contribution of colour to recognition memory for natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 509–520.Google ScholarPubMed
Year, J., & Gordon, P. (2009). Korean speakers’ acquisition of the English ditransitive construction: The role of verb prototype, input distribution, and frequency. Modern Language Journal, 93, 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zannino, D. G., Perri, R., Salamone, G., Di Lorenzo, C., Caltagirone, C., & Carlesimo, G. A. (2010). Manipulating color and other visual information influences picture naming at different levels of processing: Evidence from Alzheimer subjects and normal controls. Neuropsychologia, 48, 257–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed