No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Interrelationships among text elements in fictional prose
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Abstract
The present study employed a concept comparison method to investigate the memory representation of concept interrelationships produced by reading an O. Henry short story. Readers rated all pairings of characters and locations from the story on the basis of how closely the text elements were interpreted as being connected. The interrelationships among the characters and locations were generated by multidimensional scaling. The scaling solution contained the temporal dimension of the story as well as groupings of characters and locations very similar to the groupings in the story. In the first experiment instructional set was found to affect specific interrelationships among the plot elements rather than the overall pattern. In the second experiment a 21-day retention interval produced an effect on the overall structure of the interrelationships.
Information
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982
References
REFERENCES
Bisanz, G. L., Laporte, R. E., Vesonder, G. T., & Voss, J. F.On the representation of prose: New dimensions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978, 17, 337–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K.Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11, 717–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dooling, D. J., & Lachman, R.Effects of comprehension of retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 88, 216–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, O. J.Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1961, 56, 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenker, R. M.The organization of conceptual materials: A methodology for measuring ideal and actual cognitive structures. Instructional Science, 1975, 4, 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredriksen, C. H. Semantic processing units in understanding text. In Freedle, R. (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, 1976, 57–87.Google Scholar
Henly, N. M.A psychological study of the semantics of animal terms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969, 8, 176–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, O. The pimienta pancakes. In The complete works of O. Henry, Garden City, N.Y.: Double-day, 1953, 137–144.Google Scholar
Horan, C. B.Multidimensional scaling: Combining observations when individuals have different perceptual structures. Psychometrika, 1969, 34, 139–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A.Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 1978, 85, 365–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. Multidimensional scaling. Sage university paper on quantitative methods in the social sciences, 07–011. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1978.Google Scholar
LaPorte, R. E., & Voss, J. F.Prose representation: A multi-dimensional scaling approach. Multi-variate Behavioral Research, 1979, 14, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rips, L. J., Shoeben, E. J., & Smith, E. E.Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönemann, P. G., James, W. L., & Carter, F. S. Statistical inference in multidimensional scaling: A method for fitting and testing Horan's model. In Lingoes, J. C., Roskam, E. E., & Borg, I. (Eds.), Geometric representation of relational data. Ann Arbor, Mich: Mathesis Press, 1979, 791–829.Google Scholar
Stanners, R. F., & Brown, L. T. Conceptual interrelationships based on learning in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
Staz, C., Shavelson, R. J., Cox, D. L., & Moore, C. A.Field independence and the structuring of knowledge in a social studies mini-course. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 68, 550–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar