Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-sd5qd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T03:53:09.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mapping at the interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2010

Shula Chiat
Shula Chiat*
Affiliation:
City University London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The cross-overs between monolingual–bilingual and typically atypically developing children are a goldmine for research on language development. The four permutations of language exposure and language abilities create “natural experimental conditions” for investigating the nature of the language capacity and how this is shaped by input in typical development, and importantly, in specific language impairment (SLI). Paradis has played a prominent part in identifying and exploring this rich source of evidence. Her Keynote Article provides a valuable review of findings from her own and others' research, a carefully considered evaluation of their compatibility with competing theories of language development, and an excellent catalyst for debate.

Information

Type
Commentaries
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 261 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Black, M., & Chiat, S. (2003). Noun–verb dissociations: A multi-faceted phenomenon. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Harmondsworth: Penguin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, T., Dollaghan, C., Needleman, H., & Janosky, J. (1997). Reducing bias in language assessment: Processing-dependent measures. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 519–525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiat, S. (1981). Specificity in the development of language structure. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 10, 223–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiat, S. (2001). Mapping theories of developmental language impairment: Premises, predictions and evidence. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiat, S., & Hirson, A. (1987). From conceptual intention to utterance: A study of impaired language output in a child with developmental aphasia. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 22, 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiat, S., & Roy, P. (2008). Early phonological and sociocognitive skills as predictors of later language and social communication outcomes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 635–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conti-Ramsden, G., & Jones, M. (1997). Verb use in specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 1298–1313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebbels, S. H., Van Der Lely, H. K. J., & Dockrell, J. R. (2007). Intervention for verb argument structure in children with persistent SLI: A randomized control trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1330–1349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horton-Ikard, R., & Ellis Weismer, S. (2007). A preliminary examination of vocabulary and word learning in African American toddlers from middle and low socioeconomic status homes. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 16, 381–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ionin, T., & Wexler, K. (2002). Why is “is” easier than “s”? Acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child L2-English learners. Second Language Research, 18, 95–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L. B. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Paradis, J. (2008). Tense as a clinical marker in English L2 acquisition with language delay/impairment. In Gavruseva, E. & Haznedar, B. (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 337–356). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, M. L., & Bode, J. V. (1993). GAPS in the verb lexicons of children with specific language impairment. First Language, 113, 1–31.Google Scholar
Roy, P., Chiat, S., & Dodd, B. (2009). Is language as poor as it looks? Assessment of language potential in socially disadvantaged preschoolers. Nuffield Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/go/grants/education/page_705.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rvachew, S., Gaines, B. R., Cloutier, G., & Blanchet, N. (2005). Productive morphology skills of children with speech delay. Revue d'orthophonie et d'audiologie, 29, 83–89.Google Scholar
Watkins, R. V., Rice, M. L., & Moltz, C. C. (1993). Verb use by language-impaired and normally developing children. First Language, 13, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zobl, H., & Liceras, J. (1994). Functional categories and acquisition orders. Language Learning, 44, 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar