Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T14:08:37.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A meta-analysis of the relationship between working memory and second language reading comprehension: Does task type matter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2020

Jihye Shin Open the ORCID record for Jihye Shin [Opens in a new window]
Jihye Shin*
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: js3654@nau.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the increasing attention paid to the role of working memory in reading, findings and measurement of working memory have been inconsistent. The current meta-analysis aims to provide a quantitative description of the overall relationship between second language (L2) reading comprehension and working memory measured through reading span task and identify methodological features that moderate this relationship. Following a comprehensive search, 25 primary studies (23 peer-reviewed studies and 2 dissertations) were included comprising 37 unique samples (N = 2,682), all of which were coded for substantive and methodological features. The results showed that (a) there is a moderate relationship between L2 reading comprehension and working memory (r = .30), (b) reading span task features such as the scoring procedure, task language, and final word recall order moderate this relationship, and (c) the degree to which working memory’s involvement in L2 reading comprehension may vary depending on the type of reading tasks at hand. Implications are discussed in terms of conceptualization and measurement of working memory. Future directions are also offered in relation to measurement practices to encourage consistency and to improve our understanding of the link between working memory and L2 reading comprehension.

Keywords

meta-analysissecond language reading comprehensionworking memory
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , July 2020 , pp. 873 - 900
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

*Studies included in the meta-analysisGoogle Scholar
*Adams, R., & Shahnazari-Dorcheh, M. (2014). The relationship between working memory and L2 reading comprehension. Applied Research on English Language, 3, 19–34.Google Scholar
*Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2009). Assessing the relationship of working memory to L2 reading: Does the nature of comprehension process and RST make a difference? System, 37, 627–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2010). The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2011). Effects of working memory capacity and content familiarity on literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alptekin, C., Erçetin, G., & Özemir, O. (2014). Effects of variations in RST design on the relationship between working memory capacity and second language reading. Modern Language Journal, 98, 536–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90)., New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
*Bailer, C. (2011). Working memory capacity and attention to form and meaning in EFL reading Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.Google Scholar
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.10.1002/9780470743386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carretti, B., Borella, E., Cornoldi, C., & de Beni, R. (2009). Role of working memory in explaining the performance of individuals with specific reading comprehension difficulties: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 246–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Chang, X., Wang, P., Cai, M., & Wang, M. (2019). The predictive power of working memory on Chinese middle school students’ English reading comprehension, Reading & Writing Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10573569.2019.1579126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, I., Kim, K., & Boo, J. (2003). Comparability of a paper-based language test and a computer-based language test. Language Testing, 20, 295–320.10.1191/0265532203lt258oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Choi, S. (2013). Working memory capacity, vocabulary knowledge, and reading comprehension of EFL learners. English Education Research, 25, 25–42.Google Scholar
*Chun, D. M., & Payne, J. S. (2004). What makes students click: Working memory and look-up behavior. System, 32, 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786.10.3758/BF03196772CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, H. (2016). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehn, M. J. (2008). Working memory and academic learning: Assessment and intervention. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
*Deng, Q., Choi, W., & Tong, X. (2019). Bidirectional cross-linguistic association of phonological skills and reading comprehension: Evidence from Hong Kong Chinese-English bilingual readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54, 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuBravac, S., & Dalle, M. (2002). Reader question formation as a tool for measuring comprehension: Narrative and expository textual inferences in a second language. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 217–231.10.1111/1467-9817.00170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erçetin, G. (2015). Working memory and L2 reading: Theoretical and methodological issues. ELT Research Journal, 4, 101–110.Google Scholar
*Erçetin, G., & Alptekin, C. (2012). The explicit/implicit knowledge distinction and working memory: Implications for second-language reading comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 727–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Fontanini, I., & Tomitch, L. M. B. (2009). Working memory capacity and L2 university students’ comprehension of linear texts and hypertexts. International Journal of English Studies, 9, 1–19.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Phonological working memory: A critical building block for reading development and vocabulary acquisition? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geva, E., & Ryan, E. B. (1993). Linguistic and cognitive correlates of academic skills in first and second languages. Language Learning, 43, 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orland, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hedges, L. V., & Pigott, T. D. (2004). The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 426–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hullett, C. R., & Levine, T. R. (2003). The overestimation of effect sizes from F values in meta-analysis: The cause and a solution. Communication Monographs, 70, 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2014). L2 Reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 64, 160–212.10.1111/lang.12034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Joh, J. (2015). Exploring working memory capacity as an independent contributor to L2 discourse comprehension: A study of Korean EFL learners. Language Research, 51, 443–473.Google Scholar
*Joh, J., & Plakans, L. (2017). Working memory in L2 reading comprehension: The influence of prior knowledge. System, 70, 107–120.10.1016/j.system.2017.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44, 137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kintsch, W. (1998). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. (2013). Revisiting the construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction. In Alvermann, D. E., Unrau, N. J., & Ruddell, R. B. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 807–839). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistics approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Kozan, K., Erçetin, G., & Richardson, J. C. (2015). Input modality and working memory: Effects on second language text comprehension in a multimedia learning environment. System, 55, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Lee, M. J. (2014). Relative contribution of working memory capacity to L2 reading comprehension. English Teaching, 69, 119–146.Google Scholar
*Leeser, M. J. (2007). Learner-based factors in L2 reading comprehension and processing grammatical form: Topic familiarity and working memory. Language Learning, 57, 229–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 861–883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipsey, M. W. (2003). Those confounded moderators in meta-analysis: Good, bad, and ugly. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 69–81.10.1177/0002716202250791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 302–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Healy, A. & Bourne, L. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 139–164). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.10.1006/cogp.1999.0734CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.) (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H., & Geva, E. (1999). The contribution of phonological and orthographic processing skills to adult ESL reading: Evidence from native speakers of Farsi. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 241–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2006). The value and practice of research synthesis for language learning and teaching. In Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 3–50). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osaka, M., & Osaka, N. (1992). Language-independent working memory as measured by Japanese and English reading span tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 287–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Osamu, I. (2006). L1 and L2 working memory: An investigation into the domain specificity and processing efficiency issues. Bulletin of Ehime Universities, 53, 113–121.Google Scholar
Palladino, P., Cornoldi, C., de Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. (2001). Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29, 344–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Park, H., Nam, K., & Lee, Y. S. (2016). The role of reading span in factual and inferential comprehension and retention in L2 reading. Linguistic Research, 33, 81–106.Google Scholar
Pasquarella, A., Chen, X., Lam, K., Luo, Y. C., & Ramirez, G. (2011). Cross-language transfer of morphological awareness in Chinese-English bilinguals. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2012). How to do a meta-analysis. In Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 275–295). London: Basil Blackwell.10.1002/9781444347340.ch14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, C., Carlo, M., August, D., & Snow, C. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 246–256.10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org Google Scholar
Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustment. Chichester, UK: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Sagarra, N. (2017). Longitudinal effects of working memory on L2 grammar and reading abilities. Second Language Research, 33, 341–363.10.1177/0267658317690577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seigneuric, A., & Ehrlich, M. F. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children’s reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 18, 617–656.10.1007/s11145-005-2038-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seigneuric, A., Ehrlich, M. F., Oakhill, J. V., & Yuill, N. M. (2000). Working memory resources and children’s reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 13, 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Shibasaki, H., Tokimoto, S., Ono, Y., Inoue, T., & Tamaoka, K. (2015). English reading comprehension by Japanese high school students: Structural equation modeling including working memory and L1 literacy. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 5, 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Shin, J., Dronjic, V., & Park, B. (2019). The interplay between working memory and background knowledge in L2 reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 53, 320–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiotsu, T. (2010). Components of L2 reading: Linguistic and processing factors in the reading test performances of Japanese EFL learners. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shiotsu, T., & Weir, C. J. (2007). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary breadth in the prediction of reading comprehension test performance. Language Testing, 24, 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, H. L., & Berninger, V. (1995). The role of working memory in skilled and less skilled readers’ comprehension. Intelligence, 21, 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Tsai, A. M. (2014). The role of visuo-spatial and verbal working memory in L2 Japanese reading proficiency. SLS Papers, 32, 76–113.Google Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Noort, M. W., Bosch, P., & Hugdahl, K. (2006). Foreign language proficiency and working memory capacity. European Psychologist, 11, 289–296.10.1027/1016-9040.11.4.289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Walter, C. (2004). Transfer of reading comprehension skills to L2 is linked to mental representations of text and to L2 working memory. Applied Linguistics, 25, 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, G., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 51–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wen, Z. (2012). Working memory and second language learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z., Mota, M. B., & McNeil, A. (2015). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Zhang, X. (2015). Working memory, learning styles, reading strategy use and reading performance in Chinese EFL tertiary learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.Google Scholar