Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:01:22.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A minimal mechanism of the bilingual advantage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2017

Lisa Hsin
Lisa Hsin*
Affiliation:
University of Alabama
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Looking to atypical populations to illuminate the functioning of core cognitive systems has a long history in the behavioral sciences (e.g., Caramazza, 1986; McCloskey, 1992). Pierce, Genesee, Delcenserie, and Morgan (2017) continue that tradition in their keynote article, here by shedding light on how the development of phonological working memory (PWM) may be shaped not only by individual genetic variation but also by various features of the language acquisition context, whether that context is enriched, as in bilingualism; delayed, as with cochlear implantation (CI) or international adoption (IA); or impoverished, as with deaf children of hearing parents or repeat cases of otitis media. Their review of the literature demonstrates that a sensitive (/critical) period for phonological development, encompassing variation in quality, quantity, and timing of early exposure, has crucial consequences for an individual's level of PWM attainment and, by a compelling extension, for aspects of ongoing language development such as vocabulary learning and reading skills.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 38 , Issue 6 , November 2017 , pp. 1321 - 1325
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abutalebi, J., Cappa, S. F., & Perani, D. (2005). What can functional neuroimaging tell us about the bilingual brain. In Krool, J. & de Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 497–515). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 240–250. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001 Google Scholar
Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2003). Simultaneous bilingualism and the perception of a language-specific vowel contrast in the first year of life. Language and Speech, 46, 217–243.Google Scholar
Byers-Heinlein, K., & Werker, J. F. (2009). Monolingual, bilingual, trilingual: Infants’ language experience influences the development of a word-learning heuristic. Developmental Science, 12, 815–823.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A. (1986). On drawing inferences about the structure of normal cognitive systems from the analysis of patterns of impaired performance: The case for single-patient studies. Brain and Cognition, 5, 41–66.Google Scholar
Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001). Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind. Child Development, 72, 1032–1053.Google Scholar
Colvert, E., Rutter, M., Beckett, C., Castle, J., Groothues, C., Hawkins, A., . . . Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S. (2008). Emotional difficulties in early adolescence following severe early deprivation: Findings from the English and Romanian adoptees study. Development and Psychopatholgy, 20, 547–567. doi:10.1017/S0954579408000278 Google Scholar
de Bruin, A., Treccani, B., & Sala, S. D. (2015). Cognitive advantage in bilingualism: An example of publication bias? Psychological Science, 26, 99–107. doi:10.1177/0956797614557866 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figueras, B., Edwards, L., & Langdon, D. (2008). Executive function and language in deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13, 362–377. doi:10.1093/deafed/enm067 Google Scholar
Goetz, P. J. (2003). The effects of bilingualism on theory of mind development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 1–15. doi:10.1017/S1366728903001007 Google Scholar
Hostinar, C. E., Stellern, S. A., Schaefer, C., Carlson, S. M., & Gunnar, M. R. (2012). Associations between early life adversity and executive function in children adopted internationally from orphanages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 17208–17212.Google Scholar
Hsin, L. (2014). English questions, Spanish structure. In Côté, M.-H. & Mathieu, É. (Eds.), Current issues in linguistic theories: Vol. 333. Variation within and across Romance languages (pp. 379–399). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hsin, L., & Legendre, G. (2017). Facilitated BE acquisition in Spanish-English bilingual children: An optimality-theoretic approach to crosslinguistic influence. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Ketelaar, L., Rieffe, C., Wiefferink, C. H., & Frijns, J. H. M. (2012). Does hearing lead to understanding? Theory of mind in toddlers and preschoolers with cochlear implants. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 37, 1041–1050. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jss086 Google Scholar
Kovács, Á. M. (2009). Early bilingualism enhances mechanisms of false-belief reasoning. Developmental Science, 12, 48–54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00742.x Google Scholar
McCloskey, M. (1992). Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia. Cognition, 44, 107–157. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90052-J Google Scholar
Nguyen, T.-K., & Astington, J. W. (2014). Reassessing the bilingual advantage in theory of mind and its cognitive underpinnings. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 396–409. doi:10.1017/S1366728913000394 Google Scholar
Peterson, C. C. (2004). Theory-of-mind development in oral deaf children with cochlear implants or conventional hearing aids. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1096–1106. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.t01-1-00302.x Google Scholar
Pierce, L. J., Genesee, F., Delcenserie, A., & Morgan, G. (2017). Variations in phonological working memory: Linking early language experiences and language learning outcomes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 1265–1302.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M., & Kagan, O. (2007). Heritage languages: In the “wild” and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 368–395.Google Scholar
Tarullo, A. R., Bruce, J., & Gunnar, M. R. (2007). False belief and emotion understanding in post-institutionalized children. Social Development, 16, 57–78. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00372.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar