Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-kl2l2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-23T09:41:45.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Minimal pair word learning and vocabulary size: Links with later language skills

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

NENAGH KEMP ,
JULIANNE SCOTT ,
B. MAY BERNHARDT ,
CAROLYN E. JOHNSON ,
LINDA S. SIEGEL  and
JANET F. WERKER
NENAGH KEMP*
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania
JULIANNE SCOTT
Affiliation:
Ottawa–Carleton District School Board
B. MAY BERNHARDT
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
CAROLYN E. JOHNSON
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
LINDA S. SIEGEL
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
JANET F. WERKER*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Nenagh Kemp, Division of Psychology, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 30, Hobart 7001, Tasmania, Australia. E-mail: nenagh.kemp@utas.edu.au
Janet F. Werker, Infant Studies Centre, Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. E-mail: jwerker@psych.ubc.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the link between early linguistic skills and later language development. In a longitudinal study, we investigated infants’ (a) ability to use speech sound categories to guide word learning in the habituation-based minimal pair switch task, and (b) early productive vocabulary, related to their concurrent and later language task performance. The participants at Phase 1 were 64 infants aged 16–24 months (25 with familial risk of language/speech impairment), followed up at 27 months (Phase 2) and at 3 years (Phase 3). Phase 1 productive vocabulary was correlated with Phase 2 productive vocabulary, and with concurrent and later (Phase 3) tests of language production and comprehension scores (standardized tool), and phonology. Phase 1 switch task performance was correlated with concurrent productive vocabulary and language production scores, but not by Phase 3. However, a combination of early low vocabulary score and a preference for looking at an already-habituated word–object combination in the switch task may show some promise as an identifier for early speech–language intervention. We discuss how these relations can help us better understand the foundations of word learning.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , March 2017 , pp. 289 - 314
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Archer, S., Ference, J., & Curtin, S. (2014). Now you hear it: Fourteen-month-olds succeed at learning minimal pairs in stressed syllables. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15, 110–122. doi:10.1080/15248372.2012.728544 Google Scholar
Ballem, K. D., & Plunkett, K. (2005). Phonological specificity in children at 1;2. Journal of Child Language, 32, 159–173. doi:10.1017/S0305000904006567 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitchman, J. H., Hood, J., & Inglis, A. (1992). Familial transmission of speech and language impairment: A preliminary investigation. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 37, 151–156.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, B. M., Kemp, N., & Werker, J. F. (2007). Early word-object associations and later language development. First Language, 27, 315–328. doi:10.1177/0142723707081652 Google Scholar
Bernhardt, B. M., & Major, E. (2005). Speech, language and literacy skills three years later: A follow-up study of early phonological and metaphonological intervention. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40, 1–27. doi:10.1080/13682820410001686004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (1997). Uncommon understanding: Development and disorders of language comprehension in children. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., & Sigman, M. D. (1986). Continuity in mental development from infancy. Child Development, 57, 251–274. doi:10.2307/1130581 Google Scholar
Chiat, S. (2001). Mapping theories of developmental language impairment: Premises, predictions and evidence. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 113–142. doi:10.1080/01690960042000012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L. B., Atkinson, D., & Chaput, H. H. (2000). Habit 2000: A new program for testing infant perception and cognition [Computer software]. Austin, TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Curtin, S. (2009). Twelve-month-olds learn novel word-object pairings differing only in stress pattern. Journal of Child Language, 36, 1157–1165. doi:10.1017/S0305000909009428 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtin, S., & Werker, J. F. (2007). The perceptual foundation of phonological development. In Gaskell, G. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 579–599). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dale, P., Price, T., Bishop, D., & Plomin, R. (2003). Outcomes of early language delay: Predicting persistent and transient language difficulties at 3 and 4 years. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 544–560. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/044) Google Scholar
Dietrich, C., Swingley, D., & Werker, J. F. (2007). Native language governs interpretation of salient speech sound differences at 18 months. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 16027–16031.Google Scholar
Fasolo, M., Majorano, M., & D'Odorico, L. (2008). Babbling and first words in children with slow expressive development. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 22, 83–94. doi:10.1080/02699200701600015 Google Scholar
Feldman, H. M., Dale, P. S., Campbell, T. F., Colborn, K., Kurs-Lasky, M., Rockette, H. E., et al. (2005). Concurrent and predictive validity of parent reports of child language at ages 2 and 3 years. Child Development, 76, 856–868. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00882.x Google Scholar
Feldman, H. M., Dollaghan, C. A., Campbell, T. F., Kurs-Lasdy, M., Janosky, J. E., & Paradise, J. L. (2000). Measurement properties of the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories at ages one and two years. Child Development, 71, 310–322. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00146 Google Scholar
Felsenfeld, S., & Plomin, R. (1997). Epidemiological and offspring analyses of developmental speech disorders using data from the Colorado Adoption Project. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 778–791. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4004.778 Google Scholar
Fennell, C., Byers-Heinlein, K., & Werker, J. F. (2007). Using speech sounds to guide word learning: The case of bilingual infants. Child Development, 78, 1510–1525. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01080.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fennell, C. T., & Werker, J. F. (2003). Early word learners’ ability to access phonetic detail in well-known words. Language and Speech, 46, 245–264. doi:10.1177/00238309030460020901 Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 1–173. doi:10.2307/1166093 Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., et al. (1993). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User's guide and technical manual. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., & Bates, E. (2006). MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories: User's guide and technical manual (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Ference, J., & Curtin, S. (2015). The ability to map differentially stressed labels to different objects predicts language development at 24-months in 12-month-olds at high risk for autism. Infancy, 20, 242–262. doi:10.1111/infa.12074 Google Scholar
Fernald, A., & Marchman, V. (2012). Individual differences in lexical processing at 18 months predict vocabulary growth in typically developing and late-talking toddlers. Child Development, 83, 203–222. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01692.x Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Perfors, A., & Marchman, V. A. (2006). Picking up speed in understanding: Speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the second year. Developmental Psychology, 42, 98–116. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.98 Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Swingley, D., & Pinto, J. P. (2001). When half a word is enough: Infants can recognize spoken words using partial phonetic information. Child Development, 72, 1003–1015. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00331 Google Scholar
Girolametto, L., Wiigs, M., Smyth, R., Weitzman, E., & Pearce, P. S. (2001). Children with a history of expressive vocabulary delay: Outcomes at 5 years of age. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 358–369. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2001/030) Google Scholar
Hoff, E., Core, C., & Bridges, K. (2008). Non-word repetition assesses phonological memory and is related to vocabulary development in 20- to 24-month-olds. Journal of Child Language, 35, 903–916. doi:10.1017/S0305000908008751 Google Scholar
Hunter, M. A., & Ames, E. W. (1988). A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. In Rovee-Collier, C. & Lipsitt, L. P. (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 5, pp. 69–95). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1981). Some characteristics of delayed phonological systems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 138–143.Google Scholar
Junge, C., Kooijman, V., Hagoort, P., & Cutler, A. (2012). Rapid recognition at 10 months as a predictor of language development. Developmental Science, 15, 463–473. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.1144.x Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., & Aslin, R. N. (1995). Infants’ detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 1–23. doi:10.1006/cogp.1995.1010 Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Padden, D., Nelson, T., & Pruitt, J. (2005). Early speech perception and later language development: Implications for the “critical period.” Language Learning and Development, 1, 237–264. doi:10.1080/15475441.2005.9671948 Google Scholar
Mackenzie, H., Curtin, S., & Graham, S. A. (2012). Twelve-month-olds’ phonotactic knowledge guides their word–object mappings. Child Development, 83, 1129–1136. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01764.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, H., Graham, S. A., & & Curtin, S. (2011). Twelve-month-olds privilege words over other linguistic sounds in an associative learning task. Developmental Science, 14, 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masterson, J., & Bernhardt, B. M. (2001). Computerized Articulation and Phonology Evaluation System (CAPES). New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Molfese, D. L. (2000). Predicting dyslexia at 8 years of age using neonatal brain responses. Brain & Language, 72, 238–245. doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2287 Google Scholar
Molfese, D. L., & Molfese, V. J. (1997). Discrimination of language skills at five years of age using event-related potentials recorded at birth. Developmental Neuropsychology, 13, 135–156. doi:10.1080/87565649709540674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, R., Bernstein Ratner, N., Jusczyk, A. M., Jusczyk, P. W., & Dow, K. A. (2006). Infants’ early ability to segment the conversational speech signal predicts later language development: A retrospective analysis. Developmental Psychology, 42, 643–655. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42. 4.643 Google Scholar
Parra, M., Hoff, E., & Core, C. (2010). Relations among language exposure, phonological memory, and language development in Spanish-English bilingually developing 2-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 113–125. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.011 Google Scholar
Pater, J., Stager, C., & Werker, J. F. (2004). The perceptual acquisition of phonological contrasts. Language, 80, 384–402. doi:10.1353/lan.2004.0141 Google Scholar
Paul, R., & Jennings, P. (1992). Phonological behavior in toddlers with slow expressive language development. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 99–107. doi:10.1044/jshr.3501.99 Google Scholar
Polka, L., & Rvachew, S. (2005). The impact of otitis media with effusion on infant phonetic perception. Infancy, 8, 101–117. doi:10.1207/s15327078in0802_1 Google Scholar
Reilly, S., Wake, M., Bavin, E. L., Prior, M., Williams, J., Bretherton, L., et al. (2007). Predicting language at 2 years of age: A prospective community study. Pediatrics, 120, 1441–1449. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0045 Google Scholar
Rescorla, L. (2009). Age 17 language and reading outcomes in late-talking toddlers: Support for a dimensional perspective on language delay. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 16–30. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0171) Google Scholar
Rescorla, L., & Lee, E. (2000). Language impairment in young children . In Layton, T. & Watson, L. (Eds.), Handbook of early language impairment in children: Nature (pp. 1–38). Albany, NY: Delmar.Google Scholar
Rescorla, L., & Ratner, N. B. (1996). Phonetic profiles of toddlers with specific expressive language impairment (SLI-E). Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 153–165. doi:10.1044/jshr. 3901.153 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ring, E. D., & Fenson, L. (2000). The correspondence between parent report and child performance for receptive and expressive vocabulary beyond infancy. First Language, 20, 141–159. doi:10.1177/014272370002005902 Google Scholar
Roder, B. J., Bushnell, E. W., & Sasseville, A. M. (2000). Infants’ preferences for familiarity and novelty during the course of visual processing. Infancy, 1, 491–507.Google Scholar
Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., Jankowski, J. J., & Van Rossem, R. (2005). Pathways from prematurity and infant abilities to later cognition. Child Development, 76, 1172–1184. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00842.x-i1 Google Scholar
Schmitt, L. S., Howard, B. H., & Schmitt, J. F. (1983). Conversational speech sampling in the assessment of articulation proficiency. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 14, 210–214.Google Scholar
Shi, R. (2014). Functional morphemes and early language acquisition. Child Development Perspectives, 8, 6–11. doi:10.1111/cdep.12052 Google Scholar
Shiller, D., Rvachew, R., & Brosseau-Lapré, I. (2010). Importance of the auditory perceptual target to the achievement of speech production accuracy. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology/Revue canadienne d'orthophonie et d'audiologie, 34, 181–192.Google Scholar
Singh, L., Reznick, S., & Xuehua, L. (2012). Infant word segmentation and childhood vocabulary development: A longitudinal analysis. Developmental Science, 15, 482–495. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01141.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, B. L., McGregor, K. K., & DeMille, D. (2006). Phonological development in lexically precocious 2-year-olds. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 355–375. doi:10.1017/S0142716406060310 Google Scholar
Stager, C. L., & Werker, J. F. (1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks. Nature, 388, 381–382. doi:10.1038/41102 Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. (2011). Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children. Journal of Child Language, 38, 1–34. doi:10.1017/S0305000910000425 Google Scholar
Swingley, D. (2007). Lexical exposure and word form encoding in 1.5-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 43, 454–464. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.454 Google Scholar
Swingley, D., & Aslin, R. N. (2000). Spoken word recognition and lexical representation in very young children. Cognition, 76, 147–166. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00081-0 Google Scholar
Swingley, D., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Lexical neighbourhoods and the word-form representations of 14-month-olds. Psychological Science, 13, 480–484. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00485 Google Scholar
Thal, D. J., O'Hanlon, L., Clemmons, M., & Fralin, L. (1999). Validity of a parent report measure of vocabulary and syntax for preschool children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 482–496. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4202.482 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiessen, E. D. (2007). The effect of distributional information on children's use of phonemic contrasts. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 16–34. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.002 Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. J., & Mervis, C. B. (1994). The instrument is great, but measuring comprehension is still a problem. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59 (5, Serial No. 242), 174–179. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.1994.tb00186.x Google Scholar
Tsao, F. M., Liu, H. M., & Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 75, 1067–1084. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00726.x Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (1996). Phonological development: The origins of language in the child. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weikum, W. M., Oberlander, T. F., Hensch, T. K., & Werker, J. F. (2012). Prenatal exposure to antidepressants and depressed maternal mood alter trajectory of infant speech perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 17221–17227.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., Cohen, L. B., Lloyd, V. L., Casasola, M., & Stager, C. L. (1998). Acquisition of word-object associations by 14-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1289–1309. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.6.1289 Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Curtin, S. (2005). PRIMIR: A developmental framework of infant speech processing. Language Learning and Development, 1, 197–234. doi:10.1080/15475441.2005.9684216 Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., Fennell, C. T., Corcoran, K. M., & Stager, C. L. (2002). Infants’ ability to learn phonetically similar words: Effect of age and vocabulary size. Infancy, 3, 1–30. doi:10.1207/S15327078IN0301_1 Google Scholar
Yoshida, K., Fennell, C. T., Swingley, D., & Werker, J. F. (2009). Fourteen-month-old infants learn similar sounding words. Developmental Science, 12, 412–418. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008. 00789.x.Google Scholar
Zangl, R., Klarman, L., Thal, D., Fernald, A., & Bates, E. (2005). Dynamics of word comprehension in infancy: Developments in timing, accuracy, and resistance to acoustic degradation. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 179–208. doi:10.1207/s15327647jcd0602_2 Google Scholar
Zimmerman, I., Steiner, V., & Pond, R. (2002). Preschool Language Scale (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar