Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Orthographic and phonological effects in the picture–word interference paradigm: Evidence from a logographic language

  • YANCHAO BI (a1), YAODA XU (a2) and ALFONSO CARAMAZZA (a3)
Abstract

One important finding with the picture–word interference paradigm is that picture-naming performance is facilitated by the presentation of a distractor (e.g., CAP) formally related to the picture name (e.g., “cat”). In two picture-naming experiments we investigated the nature of such form facilitation effect with Mandarin Chinese, separating the effects of phonology and orthography. Significant facilitation effects were observed both when distractors were only orthographically or only phonologically related to the targets. The orthographic effect was overall stronger than the phonological effect. These findings suggest that the classic form facilitation effect in picture–word interference is a mixed effect with multiple loci: it cannot be attributed merely to the nonlexical activation of the target phonological segments from the visual input of the distractor. It seems instead that orthographically only related distractors facilitate the lexical selection process of picture naming, and phonologically only related distractors facilitate the retrieval of target phonological segments.

Copyright
Corresponding author
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Yanchao Bi, State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, People's Republic of China. E-mail: ybi@bnu.edu.cn
References
Hide All
Bi, Y., Han, Z., Weekes, B. S., & Shu, H. (2007). The interaction between the semantic and the nonsemantic routes of reading: Evidence from Chinese. Neuropsychologia, 45, 26602673.
Bock, K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In Gernsbacher, M. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press.
Bub, D., Cancelliere, A., & Kertesz, A. (1985). Whole-word and analytic translation of spelling-to-sound in a non-semantic reader. In Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia. London: Erlbaum.
Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177208.
Caramazza, A., Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Bi, Y. (2001). The specific-word frequency effect: Implications for the representation of homophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 14301450.
Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: Evidence from the “tip-of-the-tongue” phenomenon. Cognition, 64, 309343.
Chen, H.-C., Cheung, S. L., & Flores d'Arcais, G. B. (1995). Orthographic and phonological activation in recognizing Chinese characters. Psychological Research, 58, 144153.
Cheng, C. M., & Shih, S. I. (1998). The nature of lexical access in Chinese: Evidence from experiments on visual and phonological priming in lexical judgement. In Liu, I. M., Chen, H. C., & Chen, M.-J. (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of the Chinese language (Vol. 1, pp. 114). Hong Kong: Asian Research Service.
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In Underwood, G. (Ed.), Strategies of information processing. London: Academic Press.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204256.
Costa, A., & Caramazza, A. (2002). The production of noun phrases in English and Spanish: Implications for the scope of phonological encoding in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 178198
Costa, A., Mahon, B., Savova, V., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Level of categorization effect: A novel effect in the picture–word interference paradigm. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 205233.
Damian, M. F., & Martin, R. C. (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 345361.
DeFrancis, J. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283321.
Feng, G., Miller, K., Shu, H., & Zhang, H. (2001). Rowed to recovery: The use of phonological and orthographic information in reading Chinese and English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 10791100.
Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Now you see it, now you don't: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task. Cortex, 42, 790796.
Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In Wales, R. J. & Walker, E. W. (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116124.
Garrett, M. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and talk. New York: Academic Press.
Glaser, W. R., & Dungelhoff, F. J. (1984). The time course of picture–word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 640654.
Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects on Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 1342.
Harley, T. A. (1999). Will one stage and no feedback suffice in lexicalization? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 45.
Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Converging evidence for trhe interation of semantic and sublexical phonological information in accessing lexical prepresentations for spoken output. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 187227.
Hue, C.-W. (1992). Recognition processes in character naming. In Chen, H.-C. & Tzeng, O. J. L. (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 93107). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Institute of Language Teaching and Research. (1986). Xiandai Hanyu Pinlv Cidian (Modern Chinese frequency dictionary). Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press.
Janssen, N., Schirm, W., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). The semantic interference effect in the picture–word interference paradigm: Evidence for the response selection hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 249256.
Law, S. P., & Wong, R. (2005). A model-driven treatment of a Cantonese-speaking dyslexic patient with impairment to the semantic and nonsemantic pathways. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 95110.
Lee, C. Y., Tsai, J. L., Kuo, W. J., Yeh, T. C., Wu, Y. T., Ho, L. T., et al. (2004). Neuronal correlates of consistency and frequency effects on Chinese character naming: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 23, 12351245.
Lee, C. Y., Tsai, J. L., Su, S. C., Tzeng, O., & Hung, D. (2005). Consistency, regularity and frequency effects in naming Chinese characters. Language and Linguistics, 6, 175197.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 175.
Li, D. (1993). A study of Chinese characters. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Li, G. Y., & Liu, R. S. (1988). Hanzi Xinxi Zidian (Chinese character information dictionary). Beijing: Science Press.
Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994a). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: I. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107128.
Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994b). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: I. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 331353.
Lupker, S. J. (1982). The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture–word interference. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 349367.
Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture–word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 503535.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallellism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71102.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In Altmann, G. T. M. (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: psycholinguistic and computational perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1991). Integration versus interactive activation: The joint influence of stimulus and context in perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 558614.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375407.
Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture–word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 11461160.
Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture–word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 228252.
Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165178.
Peng, D., Yang, H., & Chen, Y. (1994). Consistency and phonetic independency effects in naming task of Chinese phonograms. In Jing, Q. C., Zhang, H. C., & Peng, D. L. (Eds.), Information processing of Chinese language. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing.
Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 101118.
Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1995). Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 2433.
Posnansky, C. J., & Rayner, K. (1978). Visual vs. phonemic contributions to the importance of the initial letter in word identification. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 188190.
Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460499.
Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107142.
Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249284.
Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1996). Interaction between semantic and orthographic factors in conceptually driven naming: Comment on Starreveld and La Heij (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 246251.
Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture–word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86102.
Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 130.
Seidenberg, M. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 546554.
Shen, D., & Forster, K. I. (1999). Masked phonological priming in reading Chinese words depends on the task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 429459.
Shu, H., & Zhang, H. (1987). The phonological processing of Chinese characters in skilled readers. Acta Psychologia Sinica, 3, 297304.
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174215.
Starreveld, P. A. (2000). On the interpretation of onsets of auditory context effects in word production. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 497525.
Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 686698.
Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996). The locus of orthographic–phonological facilitation: Reply to Roelofs, Meyer, and Levelt (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 252255.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643662.
Tan, L. H., Hoosain, R., & Peng, D.-L. (1995). Role of early presemantic phonological code in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 4354.
Wang, W. S.-Y. (1973). The Chinese language. Scientific American, 228, 5060.
Weekes, B. S., & Chen, H. (1999). Surface dyslexia in Chinese. Neurocase, 5, 101112.
Weekes, B. S., Davies, R. A., & Chen, M.-J.,(2002). Picture–word interference effects on naming in Chinese. In Kao, H. S. R., Leong, C. K., & Gao, D.-G. (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 101127). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Wong, K. F. E., & Chen, H.-C. (1999). Orthographic and phonological processing in reading Chinese text: Evidence from eye fixations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 461480.
Yin, B., & Rohsenow, J. S. (1994). Modern Chinese characters. Beijing: Sinolingua.
Yin, W., & Butterworth, B. (1992). Deep and surface dyslexia in Chinese. In Chen, H. C. & Tzeng, O. J. L. (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 349366). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999a). Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 579606.
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999b). Sublexical processing in reading Chinese. In Wang, J., Inhoff, A., & Chen, H.-C. (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 3763). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography, and phonology in reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 525565.
Zhou, X., Shu, H., Bi, Y., & Shi, D. (1999). Is there phonologically mediated access to lexical semantics in reading Chinese? In Wang, J., Inhoff, A., & Chen, H.-C. (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 135171). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zhou, X., Zhuang, J., Wu, J., & Yang, D. (2003). Phonological, orthographic and semantic activation in the speech production of Chinese. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 6, 712718.
Zhu, X. (1988). Analysis of cueing function of phonetic components in modern Chinese. In Yuan, X. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on the Chinese Language and Characters (pp. 8599). Beijing: Guang Ming Daily Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Applied Psycholinguistics
  • ISSN: 0142-7164
  • EISSN: 1469-1817
  • URL: /core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed