Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T09:57:34.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The prompt hypothesis: Clarification requests as corrective input for grammatical errors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2005

MATTHEW SAXTON ,
CARMEL HOUSTON–PRICE  and
NATASHA DAWSON
MATTHEW SAXTON
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University of London
CARMEL HOUSTON–PRICE
Affiliation:
University of Reading
NATASHA DAWSON
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The potential of clarification questions (CQs) to act as a form of corrective input for young children's grammatical errors was examined. Corrective responses were operationalized as those occasions when child speech shifted from erroneous to correct (E→C) contingent on a clarification question. It was predicted that E→C sequences would prevail over shifts in the opposite direction (C→E), as can occur in the case of nonerror-contingent CQs. This prediction was tested via a standard intervention paradigm, whereby every 60 s a sequence of two clarification requests (either specific or general) was introduced into conversation with a total of 45 2- and 4-year-old children. For 10 categories of grammatical structure, E→C sequences predominated over their C→E counterparts, with levels of E→C shifts increasing after two clarification questions. Children were also more reluctant to repeat erroneous forms than their correct counterparts, following the intervention of CQs. The findings provide support for Saxton's prompt hypothesis, which predicts that error-contingent CQs bear the potential to cue recall of previously acquired grammatical forms.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , July 2005 , pp. 393 - 414
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbeduto L., Davies B., Solesby S., & Furman L. 1991. Identifying the referents of spoken messages: Use of context and clarification requests by children with and without mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 551– 562.Google Scholar
Abbeduto L., Short–Meyerson K., Benson G., & Dolish J. 1997. Signaling of noncomprehension by children and adolescents with mental retardation: Effects of problem type and speaker identity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 20– 32.Google Scholar
Blaylock R. L., Scudder R. R., & Wynne M. K. 1995. Repair behaviors used by children with hearing loss. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 26, 278– 285.Google Scholar
Bohannon J. N., & Stanowicz L. 1988. The issue of negative evidence: Adult responses to children's language errors. Developmental Psychology, 24, 684– 689.Google Scholar
Brinton B., & Fujiki F. 1982. A comparison or request–response sequences in the discourse of normal and language-disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 57– 62.Google Scholar
Brinton B., & Fujiki F. 1993. Communication skills and community integration in adults with mild to moderate retardation. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 9– 19.Google Scholar
Brinton B., & Fujiki F. 1996. Responses to requests for clarification by older and young adults with mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 17, 335– 347.Google Scholar
Brinton B., Fujiki F., Loeb D. F., & Winkler E. 1986. Development of conversational repair strategies in response to requests for clarification. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 75– 81.Google Scholar
Brinton B., Fujiki M., & Sonneberg E. A. 1988. Responses to requests for clarification by linguistically normal and language-impaired children in conversation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53, 383– 391.Google Scholar
Brinton B., Fujiki F., Winkler E., & Loeb D. F. 1986. Responses to requests for clarification in linguistically normal and language-impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 370– 378.Google Scholar
Brown R. 1973. A first language. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Caissie R., Dawe A. L., Donovan C., Brooks H., & MacDonald S. M. 1998. Conversational performance of adults with a hearing loss. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 31, 45– 67.Google Scholar
Caissie R., & Rockwell E. 1994. Communication difficulties experienced by nursing home residents with a hearing loss during conversation with staff members. Journal of Speech–Language Pathology and Audiology, 18, 127– 134.Google Scholar
Chomsky N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chouinard M. M., & Clark E. V. 2003. Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language, 30, 637– 669.Google Scholar
Cicognani E., & Zani B. 1988. The clarification request in teacher–child conversation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 3, 303– 315.Google Scholar
Ciocci S. R., & Baran J. A. 1998. The use of conversational repair strategies by children who are deaf. American Annals of the Deaf, 143, 235– 245.Google Scholar
Coggins T. E., & Stoel–Gammon C. 1982. Clarification strategies used by four Down's syndrome children for maintaining normal conversational interaction. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 17, 65– 67.Google Scholar
Demetras M. J., Post K. N., & Snow C. E. 1986. Feedback to first language learners: the role of repetitions and clarification questions. Journal of Child Language, 13, 275– 292.Google Scholar
Donahue M., Pearl R., & Bryan T. H. 1980. Learning disabled children's conversational competence: Responses to inadequate messages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 387– 403.Google Scholar
Donahue M. L. 1984. Learning disabled children's conversational competence: An attempt to activate the inactive listener. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 21– 35.Google Scholar
Elfenbein J. L. 1992. Coping with communication breakdown: A program of strategy development for children who have hearing losses. American Journal of Audiology, 1, 25– 29.Google Scholar
Ezell H. K., & Goldstein H. 1991. Observational learning of comprehension monitoring skills in children who exhibit mental retardation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 141– 154.Google Scholar
Farrar M. J. 1992. Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 28, 90– 98.Google Scholar
Fey M. E., Krulik T. E., Loeb D. F., & Proctor–Williams K. 1999. Sentence recast use by parents of children with typical language and children with specific language impairment. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 8, 273– 286.Google Scholar
Fey M. E., Long S. H., & Finestack L. H. 2003. Ten principles of grammar facilitation for children with specific language impairments. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 12, 3– 15.Google Scholar
Fujiki F., & Brinton B. 1993. Comprehension monitoring skills of adults with mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 14, 409– 421.Google Scholar
Gagné J.-P., Stelmacovich P., & Yovetich W. 1991. Reactions to requests for clarification used by hearing-impaired individuals. Volta Review, 93, 129– 143.Google Scholar
Gallagher T. M. 1977. Revision behaviors in the speech of normal children developing language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 303– 318.Google Scholar
Gallagher T. M. 1981. Contingent query sequences within adult–child discourse. Journal of Child Language, 8, 51– 62.Google Scholar
Gallagher T., & Darnton B. A. 1978. Conversational aspects of the speech of language-disordered children: Revision behaviors. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 118– 135.Google Scholar
Garvey C., & BenDebba M. 1978. An experimental investigation of contingent query sequences. Discourse Processes, 1, 36– 50.Google Scholar
Givens G. D., & Greenfield D. 1982. Revision behaviors of normal and hearing-impaired children. Ear and Hearing, 3, 274– 279.Google Scholar
Golinkoff R. 1986. “I beg your pardon?”: The preverbal negotiation of failed messages. Journal of Child Language, 13, 45– 47.Google Scholar
Hamasaki N., & Shirai H. 2000. A contextual analysis of a Japanese two-year-old's clarification requests. In E. V. Clark (Ed.), The Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Child Language Research Forum. Stanford University, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Hargrove P. M., Straka E. M., & Medders E. G. 1988. Clarification requests of normal and language-impaired children. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 23, 51– 61.Google Scholar
Huang S.-F., & Oi M. 2001a. Maternal question-asking of Japanese children with Down syndrome and with no disability. Psychological Reports, 88, 1096– 1098.Google Scholar
Huang S.-F., & Oi M. 2001b. Maternal question-asking behavior to Taiwanese children with Down syndrome and with no disability. Psychological Reports, 88, 501– 504.Google Scholar
Hughes M. C., & James S. L. 1985. Deaf children's revision behaviors in conversations. Journal of Communication Disorders, 18, 227– 243.Google Scholar
Jeanes R. C., Nienhuys T. G. W., & Rickards F. W. 2000. The pragmatic skills of profoundly deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 237– 247.Google Scholar
Lamb S. J., Bibby P. A., & Wood D. J. 1997. Promoting the communication skills of children with moderate learning difficulties. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 13, 261– 278.Google Scholar
Leinonen E., & Letts C. 1997. Referential communication tasks: Performance by normal and pragmatically-impaired children. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 32, 53– 65.Google Scholar
Lloyd J. 1999. Hearing-impaired children's strategies for managing communication breakdowns. Deafness and Education International, 1, 188– 199.Google Scholar
Marcos H., & Bernicot J. 1994. Addressee co-operation and request reformulation in young children. Journal of Child Language, 21, 677– 692.Google Scholar
Marcos H., & Bernicot J. 1997. How do young children reformulate assertions? A comparison with requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 781– 798.Google Scholar
Marcos H., & Verba M. 1997. The influence of social context on requests in young Iranian children. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 209– 219.Google Scholar
Marcus G. F., Pinker S., Ullman M., Hollander M., Rosen T. J., & Xu F. 1992. Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial No. 228.Google Scholar
McCartney E. 1981. Constructive communication failure: The response of speech disordered children to requests for clarification. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 16, 147– 157.Google Scholar
Most T. 2002. The use of repair strategies by children with and without hearing impairment. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 33, 112– 123.Google Scholar
Otomo K. 2001. Maternal responses to word approximations in Japanese children's transition to language. Journal of Child Language, 28, 29– 57.Google Scholar
Porter R., & Conti–Ramsden G. 1987. Clarification requests and the language-impaired child. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 3, 133– 150.Google Scholar
Prather E., Cromwell K., & Kenney K. 1989. Types of repairs used by normally developing and language-impaired preschool children in response to clarification requests. Journal of Communication Disorders, 22, 49– 64.Google Scholar
Proctor–Williams K., Fey M. E., & Loeb D. F. 2001. Parental recasts and production of copulas and articles by children with specific language impairment and typical language. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 10, 155– 168.Google Scholar
Rasku–Puttonen H., Lyytinen P., Poikkeus A.-M., Laakso M.-J., & Ahonen T. 1994. Communication deviances and clarity among the mothers of normally achieving and learning-disabled boys. Family Process, 33, 71– 80.Google Scholar
Saxton M. 1995. Negative evidence versus negative feedback: A study of corrective input in child language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford.
Saxton M. 1997. The contrast theory of negative input. Journal of Child Language, 24, 139– 161.Google Scholar
Saxton M. 2000. Negative evidence and negative feedback: Immediate effects on the grammaticality of child speech. First Language, 20, 221– 252.Google Scholar
Saxton M., Backley P., & Gallaway C. (in press). Negative input for grammatical errors: Effects after a lag of 12 weeks. Journal of Child Language.
Saxton M., Kulcsar B., Marshall G., & Rupra M. 1998. The longer-term effects of corrective input: An experimental approach. Journal of Child Language, 25, 701– 721.Google Scholar
Scudder R. R., & Tremain D. H. 1992. Repair behaviors of children with and without mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 30, 277– 282.Google Scholar
Shatz M., & O'Reilly A. W. 1990. Conversational or communicative skill? A reassessment of two-year-olds' behaviour in miscommunication episodes. Journal of Child Language, 17, 131– 146.Google Scholar
Smith L., & Durkin K. 1986. Picture-book reading with a child with severe learning disability: A case study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 2, 301– 318.Google Scholar
Strapp C. M. 1999. Mothers', fathers', and siblings' responses to children's language errors: Comparing sources of negative evidence. Journal of Child Language, 26, 373– 391.Google Scholar
Strapp C. M., & Federico A. 2000. Imitations and repetitions: What do children say following recasts? First Language, 20, 273– 290.Google Scholar
Tomasello M., Farrar M. J., & Dines J. 1984. Children's speech revisions for a familiar and an unfamiliar adult. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 359– 363.Google Scholar
Yoder P. J., Davies B., & Bishop K. 1994. Adult interaction style effects on the language sampling and transcription process with children who have developmental disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 99, 270– 282.Google Scholar
Yont K. M., Hewitt L. E., & Miccio A. W. 2000. A coding system for describing conversational breakdowns in preschool children. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 9, 300– 309.Google Scholar