Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Quantity-based reasoning in the broader autism phenotype: A web-based study

  • BOB VAN TIEL (a1) and MIKHAIL KISSINE (a2)

Abstract

We conducted a web-based study investigating whether the probability of deriving four types of pragmatic inferences depends on the degree to which one has traits associated with the autism spectrum, as measured by the autism spectrum quotient test (Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Skinner, Martin, & Clubley, 2001). In line with previous research, we show that, independently of their autism spectrum quotient, participants are likely to derive those pragmatic inferences that can be derived by reasoning solely about alternatives that the speaker could have used. However, if the derivation of the pragmatic inference draws upon more complex counterfactual reasoning about what the speaker could have said, the probability that it is derived decreases significantly with one’s autism quotient. We discuss the consequences for theories of pragmatics in autism and for linguistic theorizing in general.

Copyright

Corresponding author

ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Bob van Tiel, Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (ZAS), Schützenstrasse 18, 10118 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: bobvantiel@gmail.com

References

Hide All
Altman, D. G., & Royston, P. (2006). The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ, 332, 1080.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed, Washington, DC: Author.
Andrés-Roqueta, C., & Katsos, N. (2017). The contribution of grammar, vocabulary and theory of mind in pragmatic language competence in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 996.
Barner, D., Brooks, N., & Bale, A. (2011). Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference. Cognition, 118, 8493.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1988). Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 379402.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome / high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 517.
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255278.
Bates, D., & Maechler, M. (2009. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-32. Available from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803832.
Bloom, P., & German, T. (2000). Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition, 77, B25B31.
Bott, L., & Noveck, I. A. (2004). Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 437457.
Breheny, R., Katsos, N., & Williams, J. (2006). Are generalized scalar implicatures generated by default? An online investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition, 100, 434463.
Brock, J., Norbury, C. F., Einav, S., & Nation, K. (2008). Do individuals with autism process words in context? Evidence from language-mediated eye-mouvements. Cognition, 108, 896904.
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 35.
Chemla, E., & Bott, L. (2014). Processing inferences at the semantics/pragmatics frontier: Disjunctions and free choice. Cognition, 130, 380396.
Chevallier, C., Kohls, G., Troiani, V., Brodkin, E. S., & Schultz, R. T. (2012). The social motivation theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 231239.
Chevallier, C., Noveck, I., Happé, F. G. E., & Wilson, D. (2011). What’s in a voice? Prosody as a test case for the Theory of Mind account of autism. Neuropsychologia, 49, 507517.
Chevallier, C., Noveck, I. A., Nazir, T., Bott, L., Lanzetti, V., & Sperber, D. (2008). Making disjunctions exclusive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 17411760.
Chevallier, C., Wilson, D., Happé, F., & Noveck, I. (2010). Scalar inferences in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 11041117.
Chierchia, G. (2004). Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond (pp 39103). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Colich, N. L., Wang, A.-T., Rudie, J. D., Hernandez, L. M., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Dapretto, M. (2012). Atypical neural processing of ironic and sincere remarks in children and adolescent with autism spectrum disorders. Metaphor and Symbol, 27, 7092.
Crnič, L., Chemla, E., & Fox, D. (2015). Scalar implicatures of embedded disjunction. Natural Language Semantics, 23, 271305.
DeClerck, R. (1988). Studies on copular sentences, clefts and pseudoclefts. Leuven. Leuven University Press.
Degen, J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2016). Availability of alternatives and the processing of scalar implicatures: A visual world eye-tracking study. Cognitive Science, 40, 172201.
Deliens, G., Papastamou, F., Ruytenbeek, N., Geelhand de Merxem, P., & Kissine, M. (2018. Selective pragmatic impairment in autism spectrum disorder: Indirect requests vs. irony. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Advance online publication.
Dennis, M., Lazenby, A. L., & Lockyer, L. (2001). Inferential language in high-function children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 4754.
de Villiers, J., Fine, J., Ginsberg, G., Vaccarella, L., & Szatmari, P. (2006). Brief report: A scale for rating conversational impairment in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 13751380.
de Vries, M., & Geurts, H. M. (2012). Cognitive flexibility in ASD; task switching with emotional faces. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 25582568.
Dufter, A. (2009). Clefting and discourse organization: Comparing Germanic and Romance. In A. Dufter & D. Jacob (Eds.), Focus and background in Romance languages (pp. 83121). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Fisher, N., Happé, F., & Dunn, J. (2005). The relationship between vocabulary, grammar, and false belief task performance in children with autistic spectrum disorders and children with moderate learning difficulties. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 409419.
Fox, D. (2007). Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. In U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics (pp 71120). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fox, D., & Katzir, R. (2010). On the characterization of alternatives. Natural Language Semantics, 19, 87107.
Franke, M. (2009). Signal to act: Game theory in pragmatics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam).
Frith, U., & De Vignemont, F. (2005). Egocentrism, allocentrism, and Asperger syndrome. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 719738.
Frith, U., & Happé, F. (1994). Autism beyond “theory of mind. Cognition, 50, 115132.
Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, presupposition, and logical form. New York: Academic Press.
Geis, M. L., & Zwicky, A. M. (1971). On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry, 2, 6166.
Geurts, B. (2010). Quantity implicatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, E., Piantadosi, S., & Fedorenko, K. (2011). Using Mechanical Turk to obtain and analyze English acceptability judgments. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5, 509524.
Grant, C. M., Riggs, K. J., & Boucher, J. (2004). Counterfactual and mental state reasoning in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 177188.
Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66, 377388.
Grice, H. P. (1975a). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp 4158). New York: Academic Press.
Grice, H. P. (1975b). Method in philosophical psychology (from the banal to the bizarre). Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 48, 2353.
Grodner, D. J., Klein, N. M., Carbary, K. M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2010). “Some,” and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment. Cognition, 116, 4255.
Happé, F. G. E. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101119.
Happé, F. G. E. (1995). The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development, 66, 843855.
Happé, F. G. E., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 525.
Hartmann, K., & Veenstra, T. (2013). Introduction. In K. Hartmann & T. Veenstra (Eds.), Cleft structures (pp 134). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Heavey, L., Phillips, W., Baron-Cohen, S., & Rutter, M. (2000). The awkward moments test: A naturalistic measure of social understanding in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 395406.
Hill, E. (2004). Executive dysfunction in autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 2632.
Horn, L. R. (1972. On the semantic properties of logical operators in English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles).
Horn, L. R. (1981). Exhaustiveness and the semantics of clefts. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 11, 125142.
Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. (2009). On-line interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 376415.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hughes, C., & Russell, J. (1993). Autistic children’s difficulty with mental disengagement from an object: Its implications for theories of autism. Developmental Psychology, 29, 498510.
Ingersoll, B., & Wainer, A. (2014). The broader autism phenotype. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, S. J.Rogers & K. A. Pelphrey (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders, 4th ed, pp 2856). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999a). The strange story test: A replication with high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 395406.
Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999b). A test of central coherence theory: Linguistic processing in high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome: Is local coherence impaired. Cognition, 71, 149185.
Kaland, N., Mortensen, E. L., & Smith, L. (2011). Social communication impairments in children and adolescents with Asperger syndrome: Slow response time and the impact of prompting. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 11291137.
Katzir, R. (2007). Structurally-defined alternatives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, 669690.
Kissine, M. (2012). Pragmatics, cognitive flexibility and autism spectrum disorders. Mind & Language, 27, 128.
Kissine, M. (2013). From utterances to speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kissine, M. (2016). Pragmatics as meta-cognitive control. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.
Kissine, M., Cano-Chervel, J., Carlier, S., De Brabanter, P., Ducenne, L., Pairon, M.-C., & … Leybaert, J. (2015). cpeech acts: Evidence from a semi-structured act-out task. PLOS ONE, 10, e0142191.
Kissine, M., De Brabanter, P., & Leybaert, J. (2012). The interpretation of requests in children with autism: The effect of the sentence-type. Autism, 16, 523532.
Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lilje, G. W. (1972). Uninvited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry, 3, 540542.
Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavoreP. C., … P. C., …, & Rutter, M. (2000). The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule—Generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 205223.
Loukusa, S., Leinonen, E., Kuusikko, S., Jussila, K., Mattila, M.-L., RyderN., … N., …, & Moilanen, I. (2006). Use of context in pragmatic language comprehension by children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 10491059.
Nadig, A., Lee, I., Singh, L., Bosshart, K., & Ozonoff, S. (2010). How does the topic of conversation affect verbal exchange and eye gaze? A comparison between typical development and high-functioning autism. Neuropsychologia, 48, 27302739.
Nation, I. S. P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. Language Teacher, 31, 913.
Nichols, S., & Stich, S. P. (2003). Mindreading: An integrated account of pretence, self-awareness, and understanding other minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norbury, C. F. (2005). Barking up the wrong tree? Lexical ambiguity resolution in children with language impairments and autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 141171.
Norbury, C. F. (2014). Practitioner review: Social (pragmatic) communication disorder conceptualization, evidence and clinical implications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 204216.
Noveck, I. A. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 78, 165188.
Ozonoff, S. (1997). Components of executive function in autism. In J. Russell (Ed.) Autism as an executive disorder (pp 179211). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ozonoff, S., South, M., & Provencal, S. (2005). Executive functions. In F. R.Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders, 3rd ed, pp 606627). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Paul, R., & Cohen, D. J. (1985). Comprehension of indirect requests in adults with autistic disorders and mental retardation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 475479.
Paul, R., Orlovski, S. M., Marcinko, H. C., & Volkmar, F. (2008). Conversational behaviors in youth with high-functioning ASD and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 115125.
Pavey, E. L. (2004. The English it-cleft construction: A role and reference grammar analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sussex).
Perkins, M. R. (2007). Pragmatic impairment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perner, J., Rendl, B., & Garnham, A. (2007). Objects of desire, thought, and reality: Problems of anchoring discourse referents in development. Mind & Language, 22, 475513.
Pijnacker, J., Hagoort, P., van Buitelaar, J., Teunisse, J.-P., & Geurts, B. (2009). Pragmatic inferences in high-functioning adults with autism and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 607618.
Prior, M., & Hoffmann, W. (1990). Neuropsychological testing of autistic children through an exploration with frontal lobe tests. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 581590.
R Development Core Team. 2006). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Recanati, F. (2003). Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ritchie, D. (2013). Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Russell, J. (2002). Cognitive theories of autism. In J. E. Harrison & A. M. Owen (Eds.), Cognitive deficits in brain disorders (pp 295323). London: Dunitz.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind & Language, 17, 323.
Sprouse, J. (2011). A validation of Amazon Mechanical Turk for the collection of acceptability judgments in linguistic theory. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 155167.
Storto, G., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2005). Are scalar implicatures computed online?. In E. Maier, C. Bary & J. Huitink (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9 (pp 431445). Nijmegen: Nijmegen Centre for Semantics.
Su, Y., & Su, L.-Y. (2015). Interpretation of logical words in Mandarin-speaking children with autism spectrum disorders: Uncovering knowledge of semantics and pragmatics. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 19381950.
Sucksmith, E., Roth, I., & Hoekstra, R. A. (2011). Autistic traits below the clinical threshold: Re-examining the broader autism phenotype in the 21st century. Neuropsychological Review, 21, 360389.
Surian, L., & Leslie, A. M. (1999). Competence and performance in false belief understanding: A comparison of autistic and normal 3-year-old children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 141155.
Tieu, L., Romoli, J., Zhou, P., & Crain, S. (2016). Children’s knowledge of free choice inferences and scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics, 33, 269298.
Vallduví, E. (1993. The informational component (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania).
van Tiel, B., & Geurts, B. (2014). Truth and typicality in the interpretation of quantifiers. In U. Etxeberria, A. Flu, A. Irurtzun, & B. Leferman (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 18 (pp. 451–468). Bayonne and Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain, September 11–13, 2014.
van Tiel, B., & Schaeken, W. (2017). Processing conversational implicatures: Alternatives and counterfactual reasoning. Cognitive Science, 41, 11191154.
Wheelwright, S., Auyeung, B., Allison, C., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2008). Defining the broader, medium and narrow autism phenotype among parents using the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). Molecular Autism, 1, 110.
Yirmiya, N., Erel, O., Shaked, M., & Solomonica-Levi, D. (1998). Meta-analyses comparing theory of mind abilities of individuals with autism, individuals with mental retardation, and normally developing individuals. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 283307.
Zelazo, P. D., Jacques, S., Burack, J. A., & Frye, D. (2002). The relation between theory of mind and rule use: Evidence from persons with autism-spectrum disorders. Infant and Child Development, 11, 171195.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed