Skip to main content Accessibility help

The role of morphological awareness in children's vocabulary acquisition in English



Tasks of speeded naming, phonological awareness, word identification, nonsense word repetition, and vocabulary, along with two measures of morphological awareness (morphological structure awareness and morpheme identification), were administered to 115 kindergartners and 105 second graders. In the combined sample, 48% of the variance in vocabulary knowledge was predicted by the phonological processing and reading variables. Morphological structure awareness and morpheme identification together predicted an additional unique 10% of variance in vocabulary knowledge, for a total of 58% of the variance explained; both measures of morphological awareness were uniquely associated with vocabulary knowledge. Results underscore the potential importance of different facets of morphological awareness, as distinct from phonological processing skills, for understanding variability in early vocabulary acquisition.


Corresponding author

Catherine McBride–Chang, Psychology Department, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong. E-mail:


Hide All
Anderson R. C., & Nagy W. E. 1991. Word meanings. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 690724). New York: Longman.
Avons S. E., Wragg C. A., Cupples L., & Lovegrove W. J. 1998. Measures of phonological short-term memory and their relationship to vocabulary development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 583601.
Baker S. K., Simmons D. C., & Kameenui E. J. 1998. Vocabulary acquisition: Research bases. In D. C. Simmons & E. J. Kameenui (Eds.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics (pp. 183217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bentin S., & Feldman L. B. 1990. The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 42A, 693711.
Berko J. 1958. The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150177.
Biemiller A., & Slonim N. 2001. Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 498520.
Bowey J. A. 2001. Nonword repetition and young children's receptive vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 441469.
Carlisle J. F. 1995. Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189209. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carlisle J. F. 2000. Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169190.
Carlisle J. F., & Nomanbhoy D. 1993. Phonological and morphological development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177195.
Casalis S., & Louis–Alexandre M.-F. 2000. Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 303335.
Deacon S. H., & Kirby J. R. 2004. Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223238.
Egan J., & Pring L. 2004. The processing of inflectional morphology: A comparison of children with and without dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 567591.
Fowler A. E. 1991. How early phonological development might set the state for phonemic awareness. In S. A. Brady & D. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 97117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fowler A. E., & Liberman I. Y. 1995. The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gardiner M. 2000. Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test—Revised. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.
Gathercole S. E., Service E., Hitch G. J., Adams A. M., & Martin A. J. 1999. Phonological short-term memory and vocabulary development: Further evidence on the nature of the relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 6577.
Gathercole S. E., Willis C. S., Emslie H., & Baddeley A. D. 1992. Phonological memory and vocabulary development during the early school years: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 28, 887898.
Gonnerman L. M., Seidenberg M. S., & Andersen E. 2005. Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Kempley S. T., & Morton J. 1982. The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 441454.
Lyytinen P., & Lyytinen H. 2004. Growth and predictive relations of vocabulary and inflectional morphology in children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 397411.
Mann V. A. 2000. Introduction to special issue on morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 143147.
McBride–Chang C., Shu H., Zhou A., Wat C. P., & Wagner R. K. 2003. Morphological awareness uniquely predicts young children's Chinese character recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 743751.
Metsala J. L. 1999. Young children's phonological awareness and nonword repetition as a function of vocabulary development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 319.
Nagy W., & Anderson R. C. 1984. How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304330.
Nagy W., Berninger V., Abbott R., Vaughan K., & Vermeulen K. 2003. Relationship of morphology and other language skills to literacy skills in at-risk second-grade readers and at-risk fourth-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 730742.
Napps S. E. 1989. Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships? Memory and Cognition, 17, 729739.
Nunes T., Bryant P., & Bindman M. 1997. Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33, 637649.
Packard J. L. 2000. The morphology of Chinese: A linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perfetti C. A., Beck I., Bell L., & Hughes C. 1987. Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283319.
Plaut D. C., & Gonnerman L. M. 2000. Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 445485.
Plunkett K., & Marchman V. 1991. U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perceptron: Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition, 38, 43102.
Plunkett K., & Marchman V. 1993. From rote learning to system building: Acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48, 2169.
Stanovich K. E. 1986. Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360407.
Wagner R. K., Torgesen J. K., & Rashotte C. A. 1999. Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Walley A. C. 1993. The role of vocabulary development in children's spoken word recognition and segmentation ability. Developmental Review, 13, 286350.
White T. G., Power M. A., & White S. 1989. Morphological analysis: Implications for teaching and understanding vocabulary growth. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 283304.
Woodcock R., McGrew R., & Mather N. 2001. Woodcock–Johnson III Test of Achievement. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Wysocki K., & Jenkins J. R. 1987. Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 6681.

The role of morphological awareness in children's vocabulary acquisition in English



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed