Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-65mhm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-11T23:10:05.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Norman S. Segalowitz  and
Sidney J. Segalowitz
Norman S. Segalowitz*
Affiliation:
Concordia University
Sidney J. Segalowitz
Affiliation:
Brock University
*
Norman Segalowitz, Psychology Department, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H4B 1R6, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Practice on cognitive tasks, in general, and word recognition tasks, in particular, will usually lead to faster and more stable responding. We present an analysis of the relationship between observed reductions in performance latency and latency variability with respect to whether processing has merely become faster across the board or whether a qualitative change, such as automatization, has taken place. The coefficient of variability (CV) - the standard deviation of response time divided by the mean latency - is shown to be useful for this purpose. A cognitive interpretation of the CV is given that relates it to issues of skill development.Data from second language learners' word recognition performance and from a simple detection task are presented which confirm predictions drawn from this interpretation of the cognitive significance of the CV. Initial improvement in a second language word recognition task was interpreted as involving more efficient controlled processing, which later gave way to automatization. The implications of this index of skill are discussed in relation to second language development and the general issue of automaticity of processing components in cognitive skills.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , July 1993 , pp. 369 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, P. (1987). Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekoff, Marc. (1977). Quantitative studies of three areas of classical ethology: Social dominance, behavioral taxonomy and behavioral variability. In Hazlett, B. A. (Ed.), Quantitative methods in the study of animal behavior (pp. 1–46). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Brothers, L. & Shaw, G. L. (1989). The role of accurate timing in human performance andthe code for higher cortical function. In Cotterill, R. (Ed.), Models of brain function (pp. 285–291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carlton, Mary J.Robertson, R. N.Carlton, Les G. &Newell, K. M. (1985). Response timing variability: Coherence of kinematic and EMG parameters. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 301–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, P. (1985). Restructuring versus automaticity: Alternative accounts of skill acquisition. Psychological Review, 92, 414–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossman, E. (1959). A theory of the acquisition of speed skill. Ergonomics, 2, 153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, Richard, & Dawkins, Marian. (1973). Decisions and the uncertainty of behaviour. Behaviour, 45, 83–103.Google Scholar
den Heyer, K., Goring, A., Gorgichuk, S., Richards, L. & Landry, M. (1988). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? Repetition blocking suggest the affirmative. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 274–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favreau, Micheline & Segalowitz, Norman. (1983). Automatic and controlled processes in the first and second language reading of fluent bilinguals. Memory and Cognition, 11, 565–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleishman, E. A. & Mumford, , Michael, D. (1989). Abilities as causes of individual differences in skill acquisition. Human Performance, 2, 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatbonton, Elizabeth & Segalowitz, Norman. (1988). Creative automatization: Principles for promoting fluency within a communicative framework. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1942). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (1st ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory; Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, L. L. & Brooks, L. R. (1984). Nonanalytic cognition: Memory, perception, and concept learning. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 18, pp. 1–47). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel & Triesman, Anne. (1984). Changing views of attention of automaticity. In Parasuraman, R. & Davies, D. R. (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29–61). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Logan, Gordon. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, Gordon (1990). Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, D. (1982). The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review, 89, 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, I. C, Kemp, R. I. & Grant, J. (1986). Differences between fingers and hands in tapping ability: Dissociation between speed and regularity. Cortex, 22, 461–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In Besner, D. & Humphreys, G. (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Newell, Alan & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In Anderson, J. R. (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1–55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Newell, K. M. (1991). Motor skill acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 213–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perfetti, Charles. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Michael & Snyder, C. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In Solso, R. (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rastatter, Michael & Blair, Bruce. (1984). Developmental influences on speech-motor equiva-lence: Some implications for articulatory disordered children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59,995–998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, W., Dumais, S. T. & Shiffrin, R. (1984). Automatic and control processing and attention. In Parasuraman, R. & Davies, D. R. (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 1–27). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, Norman S. (1986). Skilled reading in the second language. In Jyotsna, Vaid (Ed.), Language processing in bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and neuropsychological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, Norman S. (1991). Does advanced skill in a second language reduce automaticity in the first language? Language Learning, 41, 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, Norman S. & Hubért, Martine. (1990). Phonological recoding in the first and second language reading of skilled bilinguals. Language Learning, 40, 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, Norman S., Poulsen, Catherine & Komoda, Melvin. (1991). Lower level components of reading skill in higher level bilinguals: Implications for reading instruction. Revue de I'AILA, 8, 15–30.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, Sidney J., Unsal, Ayse & Dywan, Jane. (1992). ERP and behavioral reactiontime variability in head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 14, 73 (abstract).Google Scholar
Shallice, T. (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B298, 199–209.Google ScholarPubMed
Slater, P. J. B. (1978). Data collection. In Colgan, P. W. (Ed.), Quantitative ethology (pp. 7–24). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sloboda, J. (1985). The musical mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E. (1990). Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive resources, automaticity, and modularity. Developmental Review, 10, 72–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, J. T. (1974). Issues and models concerning the processing of a finite number of inputs. In Kantowitz, Barry (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 133–185). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Watson, John S. & Livesey, Peter J. (1982). Early rearing conditions and within-groupbehavioral variability. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 36, 98–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weismer, Gary & Elbert, Mary. (1982). Temporal characteristic of “functionally” misarticulated /s/ in 4- to 6-year-old children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25, 275–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed