Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Syllables and morphemes in German reading development: Evidence from second graders, fourth graders, and adults

  • JANA HASENÄCKER (a1) and SASCHA SCHROEDER (a1)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Children have been found to use units such as syllables and morphemes in fine-grained reading processes, before they transition to a coarse-grained, holistic route. Which units they prefer at different stages in reading development is unresolved. The present study compares the use of syllables and morphemes. Second graders, fourth graders, and adults performed a lexical decision task on multimorphemic and monomorphemic words and pseudowords that were visually disrupted either syllable-congruent or syllable-incongruent (i.e., morpheme-congruent in multimorphemic items). Syllables turned out to be the preferred unit of fine-grained processing for second graders, while fourth graders also used morphemes when morphemes were emphasized by the presentation format. Moreover, the study supports the assumption that children rely more on fine-grained processing, while adults have more coarse-grained processing.

Copyright
Corresponding author
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Jana Hasenäcker, MPRG Reading Education and Development (REaD), Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, Berlin 14195, Germany. E-mail: hasenaecker@mpib-berlin.mpg.de
References
Hide All
Amenta S., & Crepaldi D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
Anglin J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(Serial No. 238).
Baayen R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baayen R. H., & Milin P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 1228.
Baayen R. H., Davidson D. J., & Bates D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 390412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
Bertram R., Laine M., & Virkkala M. M. (2000). The role of derivational morphology in vocabulary acquisition: Get by with a little help from my friends. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 287296. doi:10.1111/1467-9450.00201
Beyersmann E., Castles A., & Coltheart M. (2012). Morphological processing during visual word recognition in developing readers: Evidence from masked priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 13061326. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.656661
Beyersmann E., Grainger J., Casalis S., & Ziegler J. C. (2015). Effects of reading proficiency on embedded stem priming in primary school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 115126. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.06.001
Burani C., Marcolini S., & Stella G. (2002). How early does morpholexical reading develop in readers of a shallow orthography? Brain and Language, 81, 568586. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2548
Carlisle J. F., & Stone C. A. (2003). The effects of morphological structure on children's reading of derived words in English. Neuropsychology and Cognition, 22, 2752. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3720-2_2
Carlisle J. F., & Stone C. A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428449. doi:10.1598/rrq.40.4.3
Carreiras M., Álvarez C. J., & De Vega M. (1993). Syllable-frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766780. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1038
Casalis S., Dusautoir M., Colé P., & Ducrot S. (2009). Morphological effects in children word reading: A priming study in fourth graders. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 761766. doi:10.1348/026151008x389575
Chetail F., & Mathey S. (2008). The syllable frequency effect in visual recognition of French words: A study in skilled and beginning readers. Reading and Writing, 22, 955973. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9135-9
Chetail F., & Mathey S. (2009). Activation of syllable units during visual recognition of French words in Grade 2. Journal of Child Language, 36, 883894. doi:10.1017/s0305000908009197
Chetail F., & Mathey S. (2012). Effect of syllable congruency in sixth graders in the lexical decision task with masked priming. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 537549. doi:10.1080/10888438.2011.607480
Colé P., Bouton S., Leuwers C., Casalis S., & Sprenger-Charolles L. (2011). Stem and derivational-suffix processing during reading by French second- and third-graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 97120. doi:10.1017/s0142716411000282
Colé P., Magnan A., & Grainger J. (1999). Syllable-sized units in visual word recognition: Evidence from skilled and beginning readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 507532. doi:10.1017/s0142716499004038
Conrad M., & Jacobs A. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 369390. doi:10.1080/01690960344000224
Ehri L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116125. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.1995.tb00077.x
Forster K. I., Davis C., Schoknecht C., & Carter R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 211251. doi:10.1080/14640748708401785
Grainger J., & Ziegler J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 112. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
Häikiö T., Bertram R., & Hyönä J. (2011). The development of whole-word representations in compound word processing: Evidence from eye fixation patterns of elementary school children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 533551. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000208
Häikiö T., Bertram R., & Hyönä J. (2016). The hyphen as a syllabification cue in reading bisyllabic and multisyllabic words among Finnish 1st and 2nd graders. Reading and Writing, 29, 159182. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9584-x
Häikiö T., Hyönä J., & Bertram R. (2015). The role of syllables in word recognition among beginning Finnish readers: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 562577. doi:10.1080/20445911.2014.982126
Hautala J., Aro M., Eklund K., Lerkkanen M.-K., & Lyytinen H. (2012). The role of letters and syllables in typical and dysfluent reading in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing, 26, 845864. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9394-3
Hothorn T., Bretz F., & Westfall P. (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal, 50, 346363. doi:10.1002/bimj.200810425
Katz L., & Baldasare J. (1983). Syllable coding in printed-word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 245256. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.75.2.245
Katz L., & Feldman L. B. (1981). Linguistic coding in word recognition: Comparisons between a deep and a shallow orthography. In Lesgold A. & Perfetti C. (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading. Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
Katz L., & Frost R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In Frost R. & Katz L. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 6784). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland Press.
Lima S. D., & Pollatsek A. (1983). Lexical access via an orthographic code? The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS) reconsidered. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 310332. doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(83)90215-3
Maïonchi-Pino N., Magnan A., & Écalle J. (2010). Syllable frequency effects in visual word recognition: Developmental approach in French children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 7082. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2009.08.003
Marcolini S., Traficante D., Zoccolotti P., & Burani C. (2011). Word frequency modulates morpheme-based reading in poor and skilled Italian readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 513532. doi:10.1017/s0142716411000191
Moll K., & Landerl K. (2010). SLRT-II: Lese- und Rechtschreibtest: Weiterentwicklung der Salzburger Lese- und Rechtschreibtests (SLRT): Manual. Bern, Switzerland: Verlag Hans Huber.
O'Connor R. E., & Forster K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 9, 7892. doi:10.3758/bf03196953
Perfetti C. A., & Harris L. N. (2013). Universal reading processes are modulated by language and writing system. Language Learning and Development, 9, 296316. doi:10.1080/15475441.1013.813828
Prinzmetal W., Hofmann H., & Vest K. (1991). Automatic processes in word perception: An analysis from illusory conjunctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 902923. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.17.4.902
Quémart P., Casalis S., & Colé P. (2011). The role of form and meaning in the processing of written morphology: A priming study in French developing readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 478496. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.008
Quémart P., Casalis S., & Duncan L. G. (2012). Exploring the role of bases and suffixes when reading familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence from French young readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 424442. doi:10.1080/10888438.2011.584333
Schroeder S., Würzner K.-M., Heister J., Geyken A., & Kliegl R. (2015). childLex: A lexical database for German read by children. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Segbers J., & Schroeder S. (2016). How many words do children know? A corpus-based estimation of children's total vocabulary size. Language Testing. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0265532216641152
Seidenberg M. (2011). Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. In McCardle P., Ren J., & Tzeng O. (Eds.), Dyslexia across languages: Orthography and the brain–gene–behavior link. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
Seymour P. H. K. (2005). Early reading development in European orthographies. In Snowling M. J. & Hulme C. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 296315). London: Blackwell.
Seymour P. H. K., Aro M., & Erskine J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143174. doi:10.1348/000712603321661859
Share D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
Spencer A. (1996). Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Taft M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7, 263272. doi:10.3758/bf03197599
Taft M. (1986). Lexical access codes in visual and auditory word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 297308. doi:10.1080/01690968608404679
Wagner R. K., & Torgesen J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192212. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192
Wimmer H., & Goswami U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51, 91103. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90010-8
Ziegler J. C., & Goswami U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 329. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Applied Psycholinguistics
  • ISSN: 0142-7164
  • EISSN: 1469-1817
  • URL: /core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 119 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 435 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st November 2016 - 22nd January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.