Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 47
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Baer, Carolyn and Friedman, Ori 2016. Children’s generic interpretation of pretense. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 150, p. 99.

    Branigan, Holly P. Bell, Jenny and McLean, Janet F. 2016. Do You Know What I Know? The Impact of Participant Role in Children's Referential Communication. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,

    Cornish, Francis and Salazar Orvig, Anne 2016. A critical look at the notion ‘pro-form’. Evidence from indexical markers, spoken discourse and (French) child language. Language Sciences, Vol. 54, p. 58.

    Jara-Ettinger, Julian Gweon, Hyowon Schulz, Laura E. and Tenenbaum, Joshua B. 2016. The Naïve Utility Calculus: Computational Principles Underlying Commonsense Psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 20, Issue. 8, p. 589.

    Sopata, Aldona 2016. Null objects in adult and child Polish: Syntax, discourse and pragmatics. Lingua,

    Allen, Shanley E.M. Hughes, Mary and Skarabela, Barbora 2015. The Acquisition of Reference.

    Brown-Schmidt, Sarah Yoon, Si On and Ryskin, Rachel Anna 2015.

    De Cat, Cécile 2015. The Acquisition of Reference.

    Hickmann, Maya Schimke, Sarah and Colonna, Saveria 2015. The Acquisition of Reference.

    Hughes, Mary E. and Allen, Shanley E.M. 2015. The incremental effect of discourse-pragmatic sensitivity on referential choice in the acquisition of a first language. Lingua, Vol. 155, p. 43.

    Ng, Melvin Mai-Rong Demir, Özlem Ece and So, Wing Chee 2015. The Acquisition of Reference.

    Pate, John K and Goldwater, Sharon 2015. Talkers account for listener and channel characteristics to communicate efficiently. Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 78, p. 1.

    Salazar Orvig, Anne and Morgenstern, Aliyah 2015. The Acquisition of Reference.

    Serratrice, Ludovica and Allen, Shanley E.M. 2015. The Acquisition of Reference.

    Stephens, Nola 2015. Dative constructions and givenness in the speech of four-year-olds. Linguistics, Vol. 53, Issue. 3,

    Stiller, Alex J. Goodman, Noah D. and Frank, Michael C. 2015. Ad-hoc Implicature in Preschool Children. Language Learning and Development, Vol. 11, Issue. 2, p. 176.

    Brown-Schmidt, Sarah and Heller, Daphna 2014. What language processing can tell us about perspective taking: A reply to Bezuidenhout (2013). Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 60, p. 279.

    Comparini, Lisa Douglas, Edith M. and Perez, Sara N. 2014. The Development of Social Cognition: Preschoolers' Use of Mental State Talk in Peer Conflicts. Early Education and Development, Vol. 25, Issue. 7, p. 1083.

    Graf, Eileen and Davies, Catherine 2014. Pragmatic Development in First Language Acquisition.

    Norimatsu, H. Blin, R. Hashiya, K. Sorsana, Ch. and Kobayashi, H. 2014. Understanding of others’ knowledge in French and Japanese children: A comparative study with a disambiguation task on 16–38-month-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 632.


The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children's use of referring expressions

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 July 2006

Choosing appropriate referring expressions requires assessing whether a referent is “available” to the addressee either perceptually or through discourse. In Study 1, we found that 3- and 4-year-olds, but not 2-year-olds, chose different referring expressions (noun vs. pronoun) depending on whether their addressee could see the intended referent or not. In Study 2, in more neutral discourse contexts than previous studies, we found that 3- and 4-year-olds clearly differed in their use of referring expressions according to whether their addressee had already mentioned a referent. Moreover, 2-year-olds responded with more naming constructions when the referent had not been mentioned previously. This suggests that, despite early social–cognitive developments, (a) it takes time to master the given/new contrast linguistically, and (b) children understand the contrast earlier based on discourse, rather than perceptual context.

Corresponding author
Danielle Matthews, Max Planck Child Study Centre, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M 13 9PL, UK. E-mail:
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Applied Psycholinguistics
  • ISSN: 0142-7164
  • EISSN: 1469-1817
  • URL: /core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *