Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Use of “um” in the deceptive speech of a convicted murderer

  • GINA VILLAR (a1), JOANNE ARCIULI (a2) and DAVID MALLARD (a3)
Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated a link between language behaviors and deception; however, questions remain about the role of specific linguistic cues, especially in real-life high-stakes lies. This study investigated use of the so-called filler, “um,” in externally verifiable truthful versus deceptive speech of a convicted murderer. The data revealed significantly fewer instances of “um” in deceptive speech. These results are in line with our recent study of “um” in laboratory elicited low-stakes lies. Rather than constituting a filled pause or speech disfluency, “um” may have a lexical status similar to other English words and may be under the strategic control of the speaker. In an attempt to successfully deceive, humans may alter their speech, perhaps in order to avoid certain language behaviors that they think might give them away.

Copyright
Corresponding author
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Gina Villar, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia. E-mail: gvil2424@uni.sydney.edu.au
References
Hide All
Akehurst, L., Köhnken, G., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (1996). Lay persons’ and police officers’ beliefs regarding deceptive behavior. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 461473.
Arciuli, J., Mallard, D., & Villar, G. (2010). “Um, I can tell you're lying”: Linguistic markers of deception versus truth-telling in speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 397411.
Benus, S., Enos, F., Hirschberg, J., & Shriberg, E. (2006). Pauses in deceptive speech. In Hoffmann, R. & Mixdorff, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Speech Prosody. Dresden: TUD Press.
Bond, C. F., Kahler, K. N., & Paolicelli, L. M. (1985). The miscommunication of deception: An adaptive perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 331345.
Bond, C. F., Omar, A., Mahmoud, A., & Bonser, R. N. (1990). Lie detection across cultures. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 189204.
Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 10, 214234.
Bond, G. D. (2008). Deception detection expertise. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 339351.
Burgoon, J., & Floyd, K. (2000). Testing for the Motivational Impairment Effect during deceptive and truthful interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 64, 243267.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using “uh” and “um” in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73111.
Cody, M., Lee, W., & Chao, E. (1989). Telling lies: Correlates of deception among Chinese. In Forgas, J. P. & Innes, J. M. (Eds.), Recent advances in social psychology: An international perspective (pp. 359368). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Davis, M., Markus, K. A., Walters, S. B., Vorus, N., & Connors, B. (2005). Behavioral cues to deception vs. topic incriminating potential in criminal confessions. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 683704.
DePaulo, B., Rosenthal, R., Rosenkrantz, J., & Green, C. (1982). Actual and perceived cues to deception: A closer look at speech. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 291312.
DePaulo, B. M., & Kirkendol, S. E. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In Yuille, J. (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 5170). Belgium: Kluwer Academic.
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74118.
Dunning, T. (1993). Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19, 6174.
Ebesu, A., & Miller, M. (1994). Verbal and nonverbal behaviors as a function of deception type. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 418.
Feeley, T. H., & deTurck, M. A. (1998). The behavioral correlates of sanctioned and unsanctioned deceptive communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22, 189204.
Fox Tree, J. E. (1995). The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 709738.
Fox Tree, J. E. (2007). Folk notions of um and uh, you know, and like. Text & Talk, 27, 297314.
Garrard, P., Maloney, L., Hodges, J., & Patterson, K. (2005). The effects of very early Alzheimer's disease on the characteristics of writing by a renowned author. Brain, 128, 250260.
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. London: Academic Press.
Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2002). Repeated interrogations: Verbal and non-verbal cues to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 243257.
Hancock, J. T., Curry, L. E., Goorha, S., & Woodworth, M. (2008). On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception in computer-mediated communication. Discourse Processes, 45, 123.
Hocking, J., & Leathers, D. (1980). Nonverbal indicators of deception: A new theoretical perspective. Communication Monographs, 47, 119131.
Johnson, R. Jr., Henkell, H., Simon, E., & Zhu, J. (2008). The self in conflict: The role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes. NeuroImage, 39, 469482.
Kasl, S., & Mahl, G. (1965). The relationship of disturbances and hesitations in spontaneous speech to anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 425433.
Knapp, M. L., Hart, R. P., & Dennis, H. S. (1974). An exploration of deception as a communication construct. Human Communication Research, 1, 1529.
Kowal, S., O'Connell, D., Forbush, K., Higgins, M., Clarke, L., & D'Anna, K. (1997). Interplay of literacy and orality in inaugural rhetoric. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 131.
Kraut, R. (1978). Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 380391.
Kraut, R., & Poe, D. (1980). Behavioral roots of person perception: The deception judgments of customs inspectors and laymen. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 784798.
Levine, T. R., & McCornack, S. A. (2001). Behavioral adaptation, confidence, and heuristic-based explanations of the probing effect. Human Communication Research, 27, 471502.
Maclay, H., & Osgood, C. E. (1959). Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word, 15, 1944.
Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2002). Suspects, lies, and videotape: An analysis of authentic high-stake liars. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 365376.
Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers’ ability to detect deceit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 137149.
Miller, G. R., DeTurck, M. A., & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (1983). Self-monitoring, rehearsal, and deceptive communication. Human Communication Research, 10, 97117.
Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., & Richards, J. N. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 665675.
O'Sullivan, M. (2003). The fundamental attribution error in detecting deception: The boy-who-cried-wolf effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1316.
Porter, S., & Yuille, J. C. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 443–358.
Rayson, P. (2008). Wmatrix: A web-based corpus processing environment [Computer software]. Lancaster University, Computing Department. Retrieved April 28, 2008, from http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/Wmatrix/
Rayson, P., Berridge, D., & Francis, B. (2004, March). Extending the Cochran rule for the comparison of word frequencies between corpora. In Purnelle, G., Fairon, C., & Dister, A. (Eds.), The 7th International Conference on Statistical Analysis of Textual Data. Louvain-la-neuve, Belgium: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
Riggio, R. E., & Friedman, H. S. (1983). Individual differences and cues to deception. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 45, 899915.
Smith, V. L., & Clark, H. H. (1993). On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 2538.
Sporer, S. L., & Schwandt, B. (2006). Paraverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 421446.
Vrij, A. (1995). Behavioral correlates of deception in a simulated police interview. Journal of Psychology, 129, 1528.
Vrij, A. (2004). Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 159181.
Vrij, A. (2008). Nonverbal dominance versus verbal accuracy in lie detection: A plea to change police practice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 13231336.
Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in children and adults. Human Communication Research, 30, 841.
Vrij, A., Edward, K., & Bull, R. (2001). People's insight into their own behaviour and speech content while lying. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 373390.
Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K. P., & Bull, R. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 239263.
Vrij, A., & Heaven, S. (1999). Vocal and verbal indicators of deception as a function of lie complexity. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 203215.
Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001). Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: The case of a convicted murderer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 187203.
Vrij, A., & Winkel, F. (1991). The frequency and scope of differences in nonverbal behavioural patterns: An observation study of Dutchmen and Surinamers. In Bleichrodt, N. & Drenth, P. J. D. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in crosscultural psychology (pp. 120137). Amsterdam: Swets en Zeitlinger.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zhou, L., Burgoon, J. K., Nunamaker, J. F., & Twitchell, D. (2004). Automating linguistics-based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communications. Group Decision & Negotiation, 13, 81106.
Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 159). New York: Academic Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Applied Psycholinguistics
  • ISSN: 0142-7164
  • EISSN: 1469-1817
  • URL: /core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed