Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Variability in the learning of complex morphophonology


This paper explores how theories on the relationship between language and domain-general cognitive capabilities might account for individual variation in second language learning. We investigated the acquisition of a morphophonological grammar paired with standardized tests of memory function. The language learned had simple and complex morphophonological patterns of word formation, which are hypothesized to correlate with standardized measures of procedural and declarative memory, respectively. The results show a significant amount of variation in learning success is accounted for by these measures of memory in accordance with the hypothesis. These findings help explain why some adults are able to learn a second language more easily than others while also advancing a model of second language learning motivated by linguistic theory.

Corresponding author
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Patrick Wong, Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208. E-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

P. L. Ackerman , M. E. Beier , & M. O. Boyle (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3060.

R. Bertram , M. Laine , R. H. Baayen , R. Schreuder , & J. Hyona (2000). Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition, 74, B13B25.

J. P. Blevins , & J. Blevins (2009). Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

A. R. Bradlow , D. B. Pisoni , R. Akahane-Yamada , & Y. Tohkura (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Accoustic Society of America, 101, 22992310.

J. Bybee (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

M. H. Christiansen , & N. Chater (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 489508.

B. A. Clegg , G. J. Digirolamo , & S. W. Keele (1998). Sequence learning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 275281.

C. M. Conway , A. Bauernschmidt , S. S. Huang , & D. B. Pisoni (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114, 356371.

H. Damasio , T. J. Grabowski , D. Tranel , R. D. Hichwa , & A. R. Damasio (1996). A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature, 380, 499505.

F. R. Eckman , A. Elreyes , & G. K. Iverson (2003). Some principles of second language phonology. Second Language Research, 19, 169208.

M. Ettlinger , E. H. Margulis , & P. C. Wong (2011). Implicit memory in music and language. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 211.

V. S. Ferreira , K. Bock , M. P. Wilson , & N. J. Cohen (2008). Memory for syntax despite amnesia. Psychological Science, 19, 940946.

S. Finley , & W. Badecker (2009). Artificial grammar learning and feature-based generalization. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 423437.

N. Golestani , T. Paus , & R. J. Zatorre (2002). Anatomical correlates of learning novel speech sounds. Neuron, 35, 9971010.

J. L. Greenbaum , & P. Graf (1989). Preschool period development of implicit and explicit remembering. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 417420.

M. D. Hauser , N. Chomsky , & W. T. Fitch (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 15691579.

P. Iverson , V. Hazan , & K. Bannister (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /r/–/l/ to Japanese adults. Journal of the Accoustic Society of America, 118, 32673278.

J. S. Johnson , & E. L. Newport (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 6099.

M. Kaushanskaya , & V. Marian (2009). The bilingual advantage in novel word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 705710.

P. K. Kuhl (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 1185011857.

A. Lengeris , & V. Hazan (2010). The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek. Journal of the Accoustic Society of America, 128, 37573768.

J. B. Misyak , M. H. Christiansen , & J. B. Tomblin (2010). On-line individual differences in statistical learning predict language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 31.

M. J. Nissen , & P. Bullemer (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 132.

B. Opitz , & A. D. Friederici (2003). Interactions of the hippocampal system and the prefrontal cortex in learning language-like rules. NeuroImage, 19, 17301737.

P. Palladino , C. Cornoldi , R. De Beni , & F. Pazzaglia (2001). Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 29, 344354.

L. H. Phillips , V. Wynn , K. J. Gilhooly , S. Della Sala , & R. H. Logie (1999). The role of memory in the Tower of London task. Memory, 7, 209231.

S. Pinker , & R. Jackendoff (2005). The faculty of language: What's special about it? Cognition, 95, 201236.

S. Pinker , & M. T. Ullman (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 456463.

M. Redington , & N. Chater (1996). Transfer in artificial grammar learning: A reevaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 123138.

P. Robinson (Ed.). (2002). Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

P. Robinson (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 4673.

P. Robinson (2010). Implicit artificial grammar and incidental natural second language learning: How comparable are they? Language Learning, 60 (Suppl. 2), 245263.

N. T. Sahin , S. Pinker , S. S. Cash , D. Schomer , & E. Halgren (2009). Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information within Broca's area. Science, 326, 445449.

D. Shohamy , & R. A. Adcock (2010). Dopamine and adaptive memory. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14.

D. Shohamy , C. E. Myers , R. O. Hopkins , J. Sage , & M. A. Gluck (2009). Distinct hippocampal and basal ganglia contributions to probabilistic learning and reversal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 18211833.

W. A. Suzuki (2010). Untangling memory from perception in the medial temporal lobe. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 195200.

C. M. Weber-Fox , & H. J. Neville (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 231256.

C. Wilson (2006). Learning phonology with substantive bias: An experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science, 30, 945982.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Applied Psycholinguistics
  • ISSN: 0142-7164
  • EISSN: 1469-1817
  • URL: /core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 41 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 208 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.